اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدRed herrings and rotten fish
201
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
A longstanding problem in biology has been the origin of pervasive quarter-power allometric scaling laws that relate many characteristics of organisms to body mass (M) across the entire spectrum of life from molecules and microbes to ecosystems and mammals. In particular, whole-organism metabolic rate, B=aM^b, where a is a taxon-dependent normalisation constant and b is approximately equal to 3/4 for both animals and plants. Recently Darveau et al. (hereafter referred to as DSAH) proposed a multiple-causes model for B as the sum of multiple contributors to metabolism, B_i, which were assumed to scale as M^(b_i). They obtained for average values of b: 0.78 for the basal rate and 0.86 for the maximally active rate. In this note we show that DSAH contains serious technical, theoretical and conceptual errors, including misrepresentations of published data and of our previous work. We also show that, within experimental error, there is no empirical evidence for an increase in b during aerobic activity as suggested by DSAH. Moreover, since DSAH consider only metabolic rates of mammals and make no attempt to explain why metabolic rates for other taxa and many other attributes in diverse organisms also scale with quarter-powers (including most of their input data), their formulation is hardly the unifying principle they claim. These problems were not addressed in commentaries by Weibel and Burness.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
The mechanism of negative group delay (NGD) is used to understand the anticipatory capability of a retina. Experiments with retinas from bull frogs are performed to compare with the predictions of the NGD model. In particulars, whole field stochastic
stimulation with various time correlations are used to probe anticipatory responses from the retina. We find that the NGD model can reproduce essential features of experimental observations characterized by the cross correlations between the stimulation and the retinal responses. The prediction horizon of a retina is found to depend on the correlation time of the stimulation as predicted by the NGD model. Experiments with dark and bright Gaussian light pulses further support the NGD mechanism; but only for the dark pulses indicating that the NGD effect of a retina might originate from its OFF response. Our finding suggests that sensory systems capable of using negative feedback for adaptation can give rise to anticipation as a consequence of the delay in the system.
In physics of living systems, a search for relationships of a few macroscopic variables that emerge from many microscopic elements is a central issue. We evolved gene regulatory networks so that the expression of target genes (partial system) is inse
nsitive to environmental changes. Then, we found the expression levels of the remaining genes autonomously increase as a plastic response. Negative proportionality was observed between the average changes in target and remnant genes, reflecting reciprocity between the macroscopic robustness of homeostatic genes and plasticity of regulator genes. This reciprocity follows the lever principle, which was satisfied throughout the evolutionary course, imposing an evolutionary constraint.
This paper has been withdrawn. Its main conclusions have been published in On dynamics of integrate-and-fi re neural networks with conductance based synapses, arXiv:0709.4370 and http://www.frontiersin.org/computational_neuroscience/10.3389/neuro.10/002.2008/abstract
Neural avalanches are collective firings of neurons that exhibit emergent scale-free behavior. Understanding the nature and distribution of these avalanches is an important element in understanding how the brain functions. We study a model of neural
avalanches for which the dynamics are governed by neutral theory. The neural avalanches are defined using causal connections between the firing neurons. We analyze the scaling of causal neural avalanches as the critical point is approached from the absorbing phase. By using cluster analysis tools from percolation theory, we characterize the critical properties of the neural avalanches. We identify the tuning parameters consistent with experiments. The scaling hypothesis provides a unified explanation of the power laws which characterize the critical point. The critical exponents characterizing the avalanche distributions and divergence of the response functions are consistent with the predictions of the scaling hypothesis. We use a universal scaling function for the avalanche profile to find that the firing rates for avalanches of different durations show data collapse after appropriate rescaling. We also find data collapse for the avalanche distribution functions, which is stronger evidence of criticality than just the existence of power laws. Critical slowing-down and power law relaxation of avalanches is observed as the system is tuned to its critical point. We discuss how our results motivate future empirical studies of criticality in the brain.
We perform a full similarity analysis of an idealized ecosystem using Buckinghams $Pi$ theorem to obtain dimensionless similarity parameters given that some (non- unique) method exists that can differentiate different functional groups of individuals
within an ecosystem. We then obtain the relationship between the similarity parameters under the assumptions of (i) that the ecosystem is in a dynamically balanced steady state and (ii) that these functional groups are connected to each other by the flow of resource. The expression that we obtain relates the level of complexity that the ecosystem can support to intrinsic macroscopic variables such as density, diversity and characteristic length scales for foraging or dispersal, and extrinsic macroscopic variables such as habitat size and the rate of supply of resource. This expression relates these macroscopic variables to each other, generating commonly observed macroecological patterns; these broad trends simply reflect the similarity property of ecosystems. We thus find that details of the ecosystem function are not required to obtain these broad macroecological patterns this may explain why they are ubiquitous. Departures from our relationship may indicate that the ecosystem is in a state of rapid change, i.e., abundance or diversity explosion or collapse. Our result provides normalised variables that can be used to isolate the trend in one ecosystem variable from another, providing a new method for isolating macroecological patterns in data. A dimensionless control parameter for ecosystem complexity emerges from our analysis and this will be a control parameter in dynamical models for ecosystems based on energy flow and conservation and will order the emergent behaviour of these models.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
