اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدProvably Efficient Reinforcement Learning for Discounted MDPs with Feature Mapping
136
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Modern tasks in reinforcement learning have large state and action spaces. To deal with them efficiently, one often uses predefined feature mapping to represent states and actions in a low-dimensional space. In this paper, we study reinforcement learning for discounted Markov Decision Processes (MDPs), where the transition kernel can be parameterized as a linear function of certain feature mapping. We propose a novel algorithm that makes use of the feature mapping and obtains a $tilde O(dsqrt{T}/(1-gamma)^2)$ regret, where $d$ is the dimension of the feature space, $T$ is the time horizon and $gamma$ is the discount factor of the MDP. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first polynomial regret bound without accessing the generative model or making strong assumptions such as ergodicity of the MDP. By constructing a special class of MDPs, we also show that for any algorithms, the regret is lower bounded by $Omega(dsqrt{T}/(1-gamma)^{1.5})$. Our upper and lower bound results together suggest that the proposed reinforcement learning algorithm is near-optimal up to a $(1-gamma)^{-0.5}$ factor.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
We study the reinforcement learning problem for discounted Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) under the tabular setting. We propose a model-based algorithm named UCBVI-$gamma$, which is based on the emph{optimism in the face of uncertainty principle} a
nd the Bernstein-type bonus. We show that UCBVI-$gamma$ achieves an $tilde{O}big({sqrt{SAT}}/{(1-gamma)^{1.5}}big)$ regret, where $S$ is the number of states, $A$ is the number of actions, $gamma$ is the discount factor and $T$ is the number of steps. In addition, we construct a class of hard MDPs and show that for any algorithm, the expected regret is at least $tilde{Omega}big({sqrt{SAT}}/{(1-gamma)^{1.5}}big)$. Our upper bound matches the minimax lower bound up to logarithmic factors, which suggests that UCBVI-$gamma$ is nearly minimax optimal for discounted MDPs.
We establish that an optimistic variant of Q-learning applied to a fixed-horizon episodic Markov decision process with an aggregated state representation incurs regret $tilde{mathcal{O}}(sqrt{H^5 M K} + epsilon HK)$, where $H$ is the horizon, $M$ is
the number of aggregate states, $K$ is the number of episodes, and $epsilon$ is the largest difference between any pair of optimal state-action values associated with a common aggregate state. Notably, this regret bound does not depend on the number of states or actions and indicates that asymptotic per-period regret is no greater than $epsilon$, independent of horizon. To our knowledge, this is the first such result that applies to reinforcement learning with nontrivial value function approximation without any restrictions on transition probabilities.
Solving real-life sequential decision making problems under partial observability involves an exploration-exploitation problem. To be successful, an agent needs to efficiently gather valuable information about the state of the world for making reward
ing decisions. However, in real-life, acquiring valuable information is often highly costly, e.g., in the medical domain, information acquisition might correspond to performing a medical test on a patient. This poses a significant challenge for the agent to perform optimally for the task while reducing the cost for information acquisition. In this paper, we propose a model-based reinforcement learning framework that learns an active feature acquisition policy to solve the exploration-exploitation problem during its execution. Key to the success is a novel sequential variational auto-encoder that learns high-quality representations from partially observed states, which are then used by the policy to maximize the task reward in a cost efficient manner. We demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed framework in a control domain as well as using a medical simulator. In both tasks, our proposed method outperforms conventional baselines and results in policies with greater cost efficiency.
This work extends the analysis of the theoretical results presented within the paper Is Q-Learning Provably Efficient? by Jin et al. We include a survey of related research to contextualize the need for strengthening the theoretical guarantees relate
d to perhaps the most important threads of model-free reinforcement learning. We also expound upon the reasoning used in the proofs to highlight the critical steps leading to the main result showing that Q-learning with UCB exploration achieves a sample efficiency that matches the optimal regret that can be achieved by any model-based approach.
In generative adversarial imitation learning (GAIL), the agent aims to learn a policy from an expert demonstration so that its performance cannot be discriminated from the expert policy on a certain predefined reward set. In this paper, we study GAIL
in both online and offline settings with linear function approximation, where both the transition and reward function are linear in the feature maps. Besides the expert demonstration, in the online setting the agent can interact with the environment, while in the offline setting the agent only accesses an additional dataset collected by a prior. For online GAIL, we propose an optimistic generative adversarial policy optimization algorithm (OGAP) and prove that OGAP achieves $widetilde{mathcal{O}}(H^2 d^{3/2}K^{1/2}+KH^{3/2}dN_1^{-1/2})$ regret. Here $N_1$ represents the number of trajectories of the expert demonstration, $d$ is the feature dimension, and $K$ is the number of episodes. For offline GAIL, we propose a pessimistic generative adversarial policy optimization algorithm (PGAP). For an arbitrary additional dataset, we obtain the optimality gap of PGAP, achieving the minimax lower bound in the utilization of the additional dataset. Assuming sufficient coverage on the additional dataset, we show that PGAP achieves $widetilde{mathcal{O}}(H^{2}dK^{-1/2} +H^2d^{3/2}N_2^{-1/2}+H^{3/2}dN_1^{-1/2} )$ optimality gap. Here $N_2$ represents the number of trajectories of the additional dataset with sufficient coverage.
الأسئلة المقترحة
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
