اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدMonotonic Properties of Completed Aggregates in Recursive Queries
216
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
The use of aggregates in recursion enables efficient and scalable support for a wide range of BigData algorithms, including those used in graph applications, KDD applications, and ML applications, which have proven difficult to be expressed and supported efficiently in BigData systems supporting Datalog or SQL. The problem with these languages and systems is that, to avoid the semantic and computational issues created by non-monotonic constructs in recursion, they only allow programs that are stratified with respect to negation and aggregates. Now, while this crippling restriction is well-justified for negation, it is frequently unjustified for aggregates, since (i) aggregates are often monotonic in the standard lattice of set-containment, (ii) the PreM property guarantees that programs with extrema in recursion are equivalent to stratified programs where extrema are used as post-constraints, and (iii) any program computing any aggregates on sets of facts of predictable cardinality tantamounts to stratified programs where the precomputation of the cardinality of the set is followed by a stratum where recursive rules only use monotonic constructs. With (i) and (ii) covered in previous papers, this paper focuses on (iii) using examples of great practical interest. For such examples, we provide a formal semantics that is conducive to efficient and scalable implementations via well-known techniques such as semi-naive fixpoint currently supported by most Datalog and SQL3 systems.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
We study here preference revision, considering both the monotonic case where the original preferences are preserved and the nonmonotonic case where the new preferences may override the original ones. We use a relational framework in which preferences
are represented using binary relations (not necessarily finite). We identify several classes of revisions that preserve order axioms, for example the axioms of strict partial or weak orders. We consider applications of our results to preference querying in relational databases.
Preference queries incorporate the notion of binary preference relation into relational database querying. Instead of returning all the answers, such queries return only the best answers, according to a given preference relation. Preference queries a
re a fast growing area of database research. Skyline queries constitute one of the most thoroughly studied classes of preference queries. A well known limitation of skyline queries is that skyline preference relations assign the same importance to all attributes. In this work, we study p-skyline queries that generalize skyline queries by allowing varying attribute importance in preference relations. We perform an in-depth study of the properties of p-skyline preference relations. In particular,we study the problems of containment and minimal extension. We apply the obtained results to the central problem of the paper: eliciting relative importance of attributes. Relative importance is implicit in the constructed p-skyline preference relation. The elicitation is based on user-selected sets of superior (positive) and inferior (negative) examples. We show that the computational complexity of elicitation depends on whether inferior examples are involved. If they are not, elicitation can be achieved in polynomial time. Otherwise, it is NP-complete. Our experiments show that the proposed elicitation algorithm has high accuracy and good scalability
We consider the problem of finding equivalent minimal-size reformulations of SQL queries in presence of embedded dependencies [1]. Our focus is on select-project-join (SPJ) queries with equality comparisons, also known as safe conjunctive (CQ) querie
s, possibly with grouping and aggregation. For SPJ queries, the semantics of the SQL standard treat query answers as multisets (a.k.a. bags), whereas the stored relations may be treated either as sets, which is called bag-set semantics for query evaluation, or as bags, which is called bag semantics. (Under set semantics, both query answers and stored relations are treated as sets.) In the context of the above Query-Reformulation Problem, we develop a comprehensive framework for equivalence of CQ queries under bag and bag-set semantics in presence of embedded dependencies, and make a number of conceptual and technical contributions. Specifically, we develop equivalence tests for CQ queries in presence of arbitrary sets of embedded dependencies under bag and bag-set semantics, under the condition that chase [9] under set semantics (set-chase) on the inputs terminates. We also present equivalence tests for aggregate CQ queries in presence of embedded dependencies. We use our equivalence tests to develop sound and complete (whenever set-chase on the inputs terminates) algorithms for solving instances of the Query-Reformulation Problem with CQ queries under each of bag and bag-set semantics, as well as for instances of the problem with aggregate queries.
Assessing and improving the quality of data in data-intensive systems are fundamental challenges that have given rise to numerous applications targeting transformation and cleaning of data. However, while schema design, data cleaning, and data migrat
ion are nowadays reasonably well understood in isolation, not much attention has been given to the interplay between the tools that address issues in these areas. Our focus is on the problem of determining whether there exist sequences of data-transforming procedures that, when applied to the (untransformed) input data, would yield data satisfying the conditions required for performing the task in question. Our goal is to develop a framework that would address this problem, starting with the relational setting. In this paper we abstract data-processing tools as black-box procedures. This abstraction describes procedures by a specification of which parts of the database might be modified by the procedure, as well as by the constraints that specify the required states of the database before and after applying the procedure. We then proceed to study fundamental algorithmic questions arising in this context, such as understanding when one can guarantee that sequences of procedures apply to original or transformed data, when they succeed at improving the data, and when knowledge bases can represent the outcomes of procedures. Finally, we turn to the problem of determining whether the application of a sequence of procedures to a database results in the satisfaction of properties specified by either queries or constraints. We show that this problem is decidable for some broad and realistic classes of procedures and properties, even when procedures are allowed to alter the schema of instances.
Threshold queries are an important class of queries that only require computing or counting answers up to a specified threshold value. To the best of our knowledge, threshold queries have been largely disregarded in the research literature, which is
surprising considering how common they are in practice. In this paper, we present a deep theoretical analysis of threshold query evaluation and show that thresholds can be used to significantly improve the asymptotic bounds of state-of-the-art query evaluation algorithms. We also empirically show that threshold queries are significant in practice. In surprising contrast to conventional wisdom, we found important scenarios in real-world data sets in which users are interested in computing the results of queries up to a certain threshold, independent of a ranking function that orders the query results by importance.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
