اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدAssessing Achievability of Queries and Constraints
205
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Assessing and improving the quality of data in data-intensive systems are fundamental challenges that have given rise to numerous applications targeting transformation and cleaning of data. However, while schema design, data cleaning, and data migration are nowadays reasonably well understood in isolation, not much attention has been given to the interplay between the tools that address issues in these areas. Our focus is on the problem of determining whether there exist sequences of data-transforming procedures that, when applied to the (untransformed) input data, would yield data satisfying the conditions required for performing the task in question. Our goal is to develop a framework that would address this problem, starting with the relational setting. In this paper we abstract data-processing tools as black-box procedures. This abstraction describes procedures by a specification of which parts of the database might be modified by the procedure, as well as by the constraints that specify the required states of the database before and after applying the procedure. We then proceed to study fundamental algorithmic questions arising in this context, such as understanding when one can guarantee that sequences of procedures apply to original or transformed data, when they succeed at improving the data, and when knowledge bases can represent the outcomes of procedures. Finally, we turn to the problem of determining whether the application of a sequence of procedures to a database results in the satisfaction of properties specified by either queries or constraints. We show that this problem is decidable for some broad and realistic classes of procedures and properties, even when procedures are allowed to alter the schema of instances.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
Assessing and improving the quality of data are fundamental challenges for data-intensive systems that have given rise to applications targeting transformation and cleaning of data. However, while schema design, data cleaning, and data migration are
now reasonably well understood in isolation, not much attention has been given to the interplay between the tools addressing issues in these areas. We focus on the problem of determining whether the available data-processing procedures can be used together to bring about the desired quality of the given data. For instance, consider an organization introducing new data-analysis tasks. Depending on the tasks, it may be a priority to determine whether the data can be processed and transformed using the available data-processing tools to satisfy certain properties or quality assurances needed for the success of the task. Here, while the organization may control some of its tools, some other tools may be external or proprietary, with only basic information available on how they process data. The problem is then, how to decide which tools to apply, and in which order, to make the data ready for the new tasks? Toward addressing this problem, we develop a new framework that abstracts data-processing tools as black-box procedures with only some of the properties exposed, such as the applicability requirements, the parts of the data that the procedure modifies, and the conditions that the data satisfy once the procedure has been applied. We show how common tasks such as data cleaning and data migration are encapsulated into our framework and, as a proof of concept, we study basic properties of the framework for the case of procedures described by standard relational constraints. While reasoning in this framework may be computationally infeasible in general, we show that there exist well-behaved special cases with potential practical applications.
A dominant cost for query evaluation in modern massively distributed systems is the number of communication rounds. For this reason, there is a growing interest in single-round multiway join algorithms where data is first reshuffled over many servers
and then evaluated in a parallel but communication-free way. The reshuffling itself is specified as a distribution policy. We introduce a correctness condition, called parallel-correctness, for the evaluation of queries w.r.t. a distribution policy. We study the complexity of parallel-correctness for conjunctive queries as well as transferability of parallel-correctness between queries. We also investigate the complexity of transferability for certain families of distribution policies, including, for instance, the Hypercube distribution.
We study here fundamental issues involved in top-k query evaluation in probabilistic databases. We consider simple probabilistic databases in which probabilities are associated with individual tuples, and general probabilistic databases in which, add
itionally, exclusivity relationships between tuples can be represented. In contrast to other recent research in this area, we do not limit ourselves to injective scoring functions. We formulate three intuitive postulates that the semantics of top-k queries in probabilistic databases should satisfy, and introduce a new semantics, Global-Topk, that satisfies those postulates to a large degree. We also show how to evaluate queries under the Global-Topk semantics. For simple databases we design dynamic-programming based algorithms, and for general databases we show polynomial-time reductions to the simple cases. For example, we demonstrate that for a fixed k the time complexity of top-k query evaluation is as low as linear, under the assumption that probabilistic databases are simple and scoring functions are injective.
We investigate trade-offs in static and dynamic evaluation of hierarchical queries with arbitrary free variables. In the static setting, the trade-off is between the time to partially compute the query result and the delay needed to enumerate its tup
les. In the dynamic setting, we additionally consider the time needed to update the query result in the presence of single-tuple inserts and deletes to the input database. Our approach observes the degree of values in the database and uses different computation and maintenance strategies for high-degree and low-degree values. For the latter it partially computes the result, while for the former it computes enough information to allow for on-the-fly enumeration. The main result of this work defines the preprocessing time, the update time, and the enumeration delay as functions of the light/heavy threshold and of the factorization width of the hierarchical query. By conveniently choosing this threshold, our approach can recover a number of prior results when restricted to hierarchical queries. For a restricted class of hierarchical queries, our approach can achieve worst-case optimal update time and enumeration delay conditioned on the Online Matrix-Vector Multiplication Conjecture.
We consider the problems of finding and determining certain query answers and of determining containment between queries; each problem is formulated in presence of materialized views and dependencies under the closed-world assumption. We show a tight
relationship between the problems in this setting. Further, we introduce algorithms for solving each problem for those inputs where all the queries and views are conjunctive, and the dependencies are embedded weakly acyclic. We also determine the complexity of each problem under the security-relevant complexity measure introduced by Zhang and Mendelzon in 2005. The problems studied in this paper are fundamental in ensuring correct specification of database access-control policies, in particular in case of fine-grained access control. Our approaches can also be applied in the areas of inference control, secure data publishing, and database auditing.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
