Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userYou should evaluate your language model on marginal likelihood over tokenisations
يجب عليك تقييم نموذج لغتك على الاحتمال الهامشي فوق Tokenisations
155
0 0
0.0
(
0
)
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
نماذج اللغة العصبية عادة ما تقوم بإدخال نص إدخال في وحدات فرعية لتحقيق مفردات مفتوحة. يتمثل النهج القياسي في استخدام التزعزيات الكنسي واحد في كل من القطار ووقت الاختبار. نقترح أن هذا النهج غير مرضي وقد يؤدي إلى اختناق تقييمنا لأداء نموذج اللغة. يتجاهل استخدام أفضل التزامات واحدا فقط عدم اليقين Tokeniser على التزامات البديلة، والتي قد تؤذي أداء نموذج خارج النطاق. في هذه الورقة، نجادل بأنه بدلا من ذلك، يجب تقييم نماذج اللغة على احتمال حدوثها الهامشي من التصعيش. قارن المقدرين المختلفة للحياة الهامشية بناء على أخذ العينات، وإظهار أنه من الممكن تقدير الاحتمال الهامشي لعدد يمكن التحكم فيه من العينات. ثم قمنا بتقييم نموذج لغة محدود مسبقا على كل من أفضل التزامات الواحدة والحيرة الهامشية، وإظهار أن الحيرة الهامشية يمكن أن تكون أفضل بكثير من الأفضل، خاصة على البيانات خارج المجال. نحن نربط هذا الاختلاف في الحيرة إلى عدم اليقين Tokeniser كما تقاس بواسطة Tokeniser Entropy. نناقش بعض الآثار المترتبة على نتائجنا لتدريب وتقييم نموذج اللغة، لا سيما فيما يتعلق بتروكيات القمامة.
Neural language models typically tokenise input text into sub-word units to achieve an open vocabulary. The standard approach is to use a single canonical tokenisation at both train and test time. We suggest that this approach is unsatisfactory and may bottleneck our evaluation of language model performance. Using only the one-best tokenisation ignores tokeniser uncertainty over alternative tokenisations, which may hurt model out-of-domain performance. In this paper, we argue that instead, language models should be evaluated on their marginal likelihood over tokenisations. We compare different estimators for the marginal likelihood based on sampling, and show that it is feasible to estimate the marginal likelihood with a manageable number of samples. We then evaluate a pretrained language model on both the one-best-tokenisation and marginal perplexities, and show that the marginal perplexity can be significantly better than the one best, especially on out-of-domain data. We link this difference in perplexity to the tokeniser uncertainty as measured by tokeniser entropy. We discuss some implications of our results for language model training and evaluation, particularly with regard to tokenisation robustness.
References used
https://aclanthology.org/
rate research
Read More
Most of the recent Natural Language Processing(NLP) studies are based on the Pretrain-Finetuning Approach (PFA), but in small and medium-sized enterprises or companies with insufficient hardware there are many limitations to servicing NLP application
software using such technology due to slow speed and insufficient memory. The latest PFA technologies require large amounts of data, especially for low-resource languages, making them much more difficult to work with. We propose a new tokenization method, ONE-Piece, to address this limitation that combines the morphology-considered subword tokenization method and the vocabulary method used after probing for an existing method that has not been carefully considered before. Our proposed method can also be used without modifying the model structure. We experiment by applying ONE-Piece to Korean, a morphologically-rich and low-resource language. We derive an optimal subword tokenization result for Korean-English machine translation by conducting a case study that combines the subword tokenization method, morphological segmentation, and vocabulary method. Through comparative experiments with all the tokenization methods currently used in NLP research, ONE-Piece achieves performance comparable to the current Korean-English machine translation state-of-the-art model.
The limits of applicability of vision-and language models are defined by the coverage of their training data. Tasks like vision question answering (VQA) often require commonsense and factual information beyond what can be learned from task-specific d
atasets. This paper investigates the injection of knowledge from general-purpose knowledge bases (KBs) into vision-and-language transformers. We use an auxiliary training objective that encourages the learned representations to align with graph embeddings of matching entities in a KB. We empirically study the relevance of various KBs to multiple tasks and benchmarks. The technique brings clear benefits to knowledge-demanding question answering tasks (OK-VQA, FVQA) by capturing semantic and relational knowledge absent from existing models. More surprisingly, the technique also benefits visual reasoning tasks (NLVR2, SNLI-VE). We perform probing experiments and show that the injection of additional knowledge regularizes the space of embeddings, which improves the representation of lexical and semantic similarities. The technique is model-agnostic and can expand the applicability of any vision-and-language transformer with minimal computational overhead.
Vector representations have become a central element in semantic language modelling, leading to mathematical overlaps with many fields including quantum theory. Compositionality is a core goal for such representations: given representations for wet'
and fish', how should the concept wet fish' be represented? This position paper surveys this question from two points of view. The first considers the question of whether an explicit mathematical representation can be successful using only tools from within linear algebra, or whether other mathematical tools are needed. The second considers whether semantic vector composition should be explicitly described mathematically, or whether it can be a model-internal side-effect of training a neural network. A third and newer question is whether a compositional model can be implemented on a quantum computer. Given the fundamentally linear nature of quantum mechanics, we propose that these questions are related, and that this survey may help to highlight candidate operations for future quantum implementation.
Intelligent agents that are confronted with novel concepts in situated environments will need to ask their human teammates questions to learn about the physical world. To better understand this problem, we need data about asking questions in situated
task-based interactions. To this end, we present the Human-Robot Dialogue Learning (HuRDL) Corpus - a novel dialogue corpus collected in an online interactive virtual environment in which human participants play the role of a robot performing a collaborative tool-organization task. We describe the corpus data and a corresponding annotation scheme to offer insight into the form and content of questions that humans ask to facilitate learning in a situated environment. We provide the corpus as an empirically-grounded resource for improving question generation in situated intelligent agents.
Basalt is classified as a isotropic rock in according to its mechanical
properties. But gypsum is considered isotropic transverse rock . coming
the mechanical parameters values joins practice direction of parameters
.
By using a nondestructive me
thod such as the ultrasonic test which
depends on understanding the effectual of mechanical properties upon
speed of ultrasonics inside rocks , one can indirectly predict the
mentioned parameters
Tests were completed within 35 gypsum and 11 basalt rocks specimens
which collected by completions under the direction of General
Organization for Land Development ( Directorate of Geological
Investigation).
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
