Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userAn in vitro comparative study of microleakage with self-adhasive flowable composite resin and traditional flowable composite
دراسة مخبرية مقارنة لتقييم التسرب الحفافي للراتنج المركب السيال ذاتي الإلصاق و الراتنج المركب السيال التقليدي
962
0 37
0
(
0
)
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
أجريت هذه الدراسة لمعرفة قابلية الختم للمواد المرممة السنية, و لتقييم التسرب الحفافي في حفر الصنف الخامس المرممة بالراتنج المركب ذاتي الإلصاق الجديد, و مقارنته مع الراتنج المركب السيال التقليدي.
Regarding the sealing ability of restorative dental materials, this study was done to assess the microleakage of class V cavities restored with a new self-adhesive flowable composite resin and compare to different flowable materials.
References used
Leinfelder, K.F., Posterior composite resins: the materials and their clinical performance. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 1995. 126(5): p. 663667671675- 664668672676
Lutz, F., The postamalgam age. Operative dentistry, 1995. 20(6 :)p. 218-222
De Munck, J.d., et al., A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. Journal of dental research, 2005. 84(2): p. 118-132
rate research
Read More
Aim: to compare the effect of multiple usage and surface coarseness of diamond
burs on marginal microleakage of cervical resin composite restorations.
Materials and methods: sixty extracted premolars without caries were chosen. The
sample was rand
omly divided into three groups: n1=n2=n3=20. Group(1): class v cavities
were prepared using super coarse diamond burs, group(2): prepared by coarse diamond
burs, whereas group)3(: prepared by medium coarse diamond burs. All cavities were
restored by resin composite, then The teeth were thermocycled and immersedIn5%solution
of methylene blue dye for 12hours.Then the teeth were sectioned vertically, Dye
penetration was evaluated using a 10X stereomicroscope at the occlusal and gingival
margins. Data were collected and statistical analysis was conducted.
Results: The results showed that the multiple use of super coarse diamond burs
caused no significantly statistically affect on occlusal and gingival microleakage (P>0.05).
However, the multiple use of coarse and medium diamond burs caused significantly
statistically affect on gingival marginal microleakage (P<0.05).
The purpose of this study is to detect the relationship between dentin
bonding systems (total etch and self etch) and the marginal leakage of
composite resin restorations.
Introduction :The demand for posterior aesthetic restorations has dramatically
increased in recent years. Several new materials have been developed with improved
aesthetic, adhesive and mechanical properties.
Theoretically, nano-structured dental
resin omposites are purported to have increased
wear and hardness resistance compared with hybrid composites and may favor the
achievement of restoratives with better long-term performance.
Aim: The wear resistance of different types of resin composites were evaluated in
the in vitro study.
Material and methods :Two nanohybrid restorative composites -Tetric®EvoCeram
(Ivoclar-Vivadent) and CeramXTM(Dentsply) - were compared with a microhybrid
material - Tetric®Ceram (Ivoclar-Vivadent) and hybrid material Spectrom (Dentsply) .
wear resistance : fifteen specimens (3x3 mm) of each material were subjected to
wear tests .
The data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA(<=0.5).
Results :
The Tetric®EvoCeram composite resin exhibited significantly less wear than the
CeramX and Tetric®Ceram material .
Conclusions :In terms of wear resistance, nano-structured composites may perform
either similarly or comparatively
better than a microfilled and hyprid composite .
nanohybrid restorative composites can thus be considered as a good restorative
material.
Resin based composite considers substantially as a restorative
material in clinic. Dentists concern in placement resin composite
restorations with Long term survival.
Materials and Methods: 20 Non carious human third molars, class I
cavity was pr
epared in every molar, restored with methacrylate
resin composite Tetric EvoCeram. The restored teeth were
subjected to thermocycles. Specimen was randomly divided into
two groups : the first group 10 restorations, were repaired by
Cojet® (3M ESPE, Germany) and restored by Filtek™ P90, the
second group 10 restorations also repaired by Cojet ® but restored
by Filtek™ Z350 XT. After that all teeth were subjected to
thermocycles again, later immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin solution
for 1 s. The teeth were transversely sectioned and observed under
a stereomicroscope. The degree of dye penetration was recorded
and analyzed.
Results: No statistically significant differences in microleakage
were observed between two groups either with low shrinkage
Silorane resin composite or methacrylate resin composite
The aim : This study aims to evaluate and compare the microleakage between nano
and hybrid composite.
Materials and Methods : the sample consisted of forty extracted premolars for
orthodontics purposes , class v cavities were prepared with a speci
fic dimensions on the
buccal surface. The sample divided into two groups ; group A restored by nanocomposite (
Z350) , group B restored by hybrid composite ( Z250) , after that, the samples were placed
in the incubator with thermo cycling for a month ,The samples were then immersed in 0.5
% methelyne blue dye for 24 hours , each tooth was mesial-distal sectioned vertically ,
finally, of all samples was studied using stereomicroscope to evaluated the microleakage .
Results : there was no statistical significant difference between the nano and hybrid
composite according to microleakage.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
