Do you want to publish a course? Click here

In-vitro Study to Compare Repairing Resin Composite Restorations Using two Different Types

دراسة مخبرية لمقارنة إصلاح ترميمات الراتنج المركب باستخدام نوعين مختلفين منه

1280   0   2   0 ( 0 )
 Publication date 2014
and research's language is العربية
 Created by Shamra Editor




Ask ChatGPT about the research

Resin based composite considers substantially as a restorative material in clinic. Dentists concern in placement resin composite restorations with Long term survival. Materials and Methods: 20 Non carious human third molars, class I cavity was prepared in every molar, restored with methacrylate resin composite Tetric EvoCeram. The restored teeth were subjected to thermocycles. Specimen was randomly divided into two groups : the first group 10 restorations, were repaired by Cojet® (3M ESPE, Germany) and restored by Filtek™ P90, the second group 10 restorations also repaired by Cojet ® but restored by Filtek™ Z350 XT. After that all teeth were subjected to thermocycles again, later immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin solution for 1 s. The teeth were transversely sectioned and observed under a stereomicroscope. The degree of dye penetration was recorded and analyzed. Results: No statistically significant differences in microleakage were observed between two groups either with low shrinkage Silorane resin composite or methacrylate resin composite

References used
Papacchini F, Monticelli F, Hasa I, Radovic I, Fabianelli A, Polimeni A, Ferrari M 2007 Effect of air-drying temperature on the effectiveness of silane primers and coupling blends in the repair of a microhybrid resin composite, J Adhes Dent , Aug;9:391-7
Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ 2012 Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials, Dent Mater ,28(1):87-101
Demarco FF, Pereira-Cenci T, de Almeida Andre D, de Sousa Barbosa RP, Piva E, Cenci MS 2011 Effects of metallic or translucent matrices for class II composite restorations: 4-year clinical follow-up findings. Clin Oral Invest, 15:39–47
Guiraldo RD , Consani S, Consani RL, Berger SB, Mendes WB, Sinhoreti MA, Correr-Sobrinho L 2010 Comparison of silorane and methacrylate-based composite resins on the curing light transmission, Braz Dent J , 21(6):538-42
Ferracane JL 2011 Resin composite--state of the art, Dent Mater , 27(1):29-38
rate research

Read More

The elapsed time is considered as an essential factor when some procedures are required on resin composite restorations like repairing, etc.., and the question is whether this factor is going to effect on using silorane resin composite. Twenty sil orane based resin composite blocks were prepared (8×8×4)mm, randomly assigned into two groups: the first group 10 blocks, half of each resin block was removed by diamond burs after thermocycles, the second group 10 blocks also half of each resin block was removed by diamond burs after fabrication. All Interfacial surfaces were conditioned by (Cojet™, 3M ESPE). Blocks were restored with silorane resin composite and subjected to thermocycles. Microleakage observed under a stereomicroscope after blocks were immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin solution for 10 s, and transversely sectioned. Mann-Whitney U test found no statistically significant differences in microleakage between two groups either with fresh silorane resin composite group or aged silorane resin composite group.
Regarding the sealing ability of restorative dental materials, this study was done to assess the microleakage of class V cavities restored with a new self-adhesive flowable composite resin and compare to different flowable materials.
Aim: to compare the effect of multiple usage and surface coarseness of diamond burs on marginal microleakage of cervical resin composite restorations. Materials and methods: sixty extracted premolars without caries were chosen. The sample was rand omly divided into three groups: n1=n2=n3=20. Group(1): class v cavities were prepared using super coarse diamond burs, group(2): prepared by coarse diamond burs, whereas group)3(: prepared by medium coarse diamond burs. All cavities were restored by resin composite, then The teeth were thermocycled and immersedIn5%solution of methylene blue dye for 12hours.Then the teeth were sectioned vertically, Dye penetration was evaluated using a 10X stereomicroscope at the occlusal and gingival margins. Data were collected and statistical analysis was conducted. Results: The results showed that the multiple use of super coarse diamond burs caused no significantly statistically affect on occlusal and gingival microleakage (P>0.05). However, the multiple use of coarse and medium diamond burs caused significantly statistically affect on gingival marginal microleakage (P<0.05).
The aim of this study is to evaluate the microleakage resultant from; Silorane resin composite restorations in primary teeth Prepared Using Burs And Er:YAG Laser with or without using additional etching.
comments
Fetching comments Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا