Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userAutomatic Verification of Data Summaries
التحقق التلقائي من ملخصات البيانات
441
0 0
0.0
(
0
)
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
نقدم طريقة عامة لحساب الدقة الملحة لتخفيف البيانات الناتجة عن الحد الأدنى من جهود المستخدم.نحن ننظر إلى Prob-Lem كهامة لفحص الحقائق للتحقق من مطالبات NU-Merical في النص.يفترض التحقق من Gorithm أن البيانات المستخدمة في الحصول على النص متاح.في هذه الورقة، نقوم بفاية استخدام الحل المقترح قد استخدمه هذه المطالبات غير الصحيحة حول ملخصات كرة السلة TEX-Tual في سياق مهمة بدقة في INLG 2021.
We present a generic method to compute thefactual accuracy of a generated data summarywith minimal user effort. We look at the prob-lem as a fact-checking task to verify the nu-merical claims in the text. The verification al-gorithm assumes that the data used to generatethe text is available. In this paper, we describehow the proposed solution has been used toidentify incorrect claims about basketball tex-tual summaries in the context of the AccuracyShared Task at INLG 2021.
References used
https://aclanthology.org/
rate research
Read More
Pre-trained neural language models give high performance on natural language inference (NLI) tasks. But whether they actually understand the meaning of the processed sequences is still unclear. We propose a new diagnostics test suite which allows to
assess whether a dataset constitutes a good testbed for evaluating the models' meaning understanding capabilities. We specifically apply controlled corruption transformations to widely used benchmarks (MNLI and ANLI), which involve removing entire word classes and often lead to non-sensical sentence pairs. If model accuracy on the corrupted data remains high, then the dataset is likely to contain statistical biases and artefacts that guide prediction. Inversely, a large decrease in model accuracy indicates that the original dataset provides a proper challenge to the models' reasoning capabilities. Hence, our proposed controls can serve as a crash test for developing high quality data for NLI tasks.
For decades, published Automatic Signature Verification (ASV) works depended on using one feature set. Some researchers selected this feature set based on their experience, and some others selected it using some feature selection algorithms that can
select the best
feature set (bfs). In practical systems, the documents containing the signatures could be noisy, and recognition of check writer in multi-signatory accounts is required. Due to the error caused by such requirements and data quality, improving the performance of ASV
becomes a necessity. In this paper, a new technique for ASV decision making using Multi-Sets of Features is introduced. The experimental results have shown that the introduced technique gives important improvement in forgery detection and in the overall performance of the system.
The present paper summarizes an attempt we made to meet a shared task challenge on grounding machine-generated summaries of NBA matchups (https://github.com/ehudreiter/accuracySharedTask.git). In the first half, we discuss methods and in the second,
we report results, together with a discussion on what feature may have had an effect on the performance.
Understanding tables is an important and relevant task that involves understanding table structure as well as being able to compare and contrast information within cells. In this paper, we address this challenge by presenting a new dataset and tasks
that addresses this goal in a shared task in SemEval 2020 Task 9: Fact Verification and Evidence Finding for Tabular Data in Scientific Documents (SEM-TAB-FACTS). Our dataset contains 981 manually-generated tables and an auto-generated dataset of 1980 tables providing over 180K statement and over 16M evidence annotations. SEM-TAB-FACTS featured two sub-tasks. In sub-task A, the goal was to determine if a statement is supported, refuted or unknown in relation to a table. In sub-task B, the focus was on identifying the specific cells of a table that provide evidence for the statement. 69 teams signed up to participate in the task with 19 successful submissions to subtask A and 12 successful submissions to subtask B. We present our results and main findings from the competition.
This work describes the adaptation of a pretrained sequence-to-sequence model to the task of scientific claim verification in the biomedical domain. We propose a system called VerT5erini that exploits T5 for abstract retrieval, sentence selection, an
d label prediction, which are three critical sub-tasks of claim verification. We evaluate our pipeline on SciFACT, a newly curated dataset that requires models to not just predict the veracity of claims but also provide relevant sentences from a corpus of scientific literature that support the prediction. Empirically, our system outperforms a strong baseline in each of the three sub-tasks. We further show VerT5erini's ability to generalize to two new datasets of COVID-19 claims using evidence from the CORD-19 corpus.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
