Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userScientific Claim Verification with VerT5erini
التحقق العلمي التحقق مع Vert5erini
428
0 0
0.0
(
0
)
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
يصف هذا العمل تكيف نموذج تسلسل متطلب مسبقا بمهمة التحقق من المطالبة العلمية في المجال الطبي الطبيعي.نقترح نظام يسمى Vert5erini الذي يستغل T5 لاسترجاع الملخص واختيار الجملة وتنبؤ التسمية، وهي ثلاثة مهام فرعية حرجة للتحقق من الادعاء.نقوم بتقييم خط أنابيبنا في SCIFACT، وهي مجموعة بيانات مفيدة حديثا تتطلب نماذج لا تتوقع فقط عن صحة المطالبات ولكنها توفر أيضا جمل ذات صلة من كائن من الأدبيات العلمية التي تدعم التنبؤ.تجريبيا، يتفوق نظامنا على خط أساس قوي في كل من المهام الفرعية الثلاث.نعرض أيضا قدرة Vert5erini على التعميم لمجموعات بيانات جديدة من مطالبات CovID-19 باستخدام أدلة من Cord-19 Corpus.
This work describes the adaptation of a pretrained sequence-to-sequence model to the task of scientific claim verification in the biomedical domain. We propose a system called VerT5erini that exploits T5 for abstract retrieval, sentence selection, and label prediction, which are three critical sub-tasks of claim verification. We evaluate our pipeline on SciFACT, a newly curated dataset that requires models to not just predict the veracity of claims but also provide relevant sentences from a corpus of scientific literature that support the prediction. Empirically, our system outperforms a strong baseline in each of the three sub-tasks. We further show VerT5erini's ability to generalize to two new datasets of COVID-19 claims using evidence from the CORD-19 corpus.
References used
https://aclanthology.org/
rate research
Read More
We present an overview of the SCIVER shared task, presented at the 2nd Scholarly Document Processing (SDP) workshop at NAACL 2021. In this shared task, systems were provided a scientific claim and a corpus of research abstracts, and asked to identify
which articles Support or Refute the claim as well as provide evidentiary sentences justifying those labels. 11 teams made a total of 14 submissions to the shared task leaderboard, leading to an improvement of more than +23 F1 on the primary task evaluation metric. In addition to surveying the participating systems, we provide several insights into modeling approaches to support continued progress and future research on the important and challenging task of scientific claim verification.
Tables provide valuable knowledge that can be used to verify textual statements. While a number of works have considered table-based fact verification, direct alignments of tabular data with tokens in textual statements are rarely available. Moreover
, training a generalized fact verification model requires abundant labeled training data. In this paper, we propose a novel system to address these problems. Inspired by counterfactual causality, our system identifies token-level salience in the statement with probing-based salience estimation. Salience estimation allows enhanced learning of fact verification from two perspectives. From one perspective, our system conducts masked salient token prediction to enhance the model for alignment and reasoning between the table and the statement. From the other perspective, our system applies salience-aware data augmentation to generate a more diverse set of training instances by replacing non-salient terms. Experimental results on TabFact show the effective improvement by the proposed salience-aware learning techniques, leading to the new SOTA performance on the benchmark.
We present a dataset, DanFEVER, intended for multilingual misinformation research. The dataset is in Danish and has the same format as the well-known English FEVER dataset. It can be used for testing methods in multilingual settings, as well as for creating models in production for the Danish language.
We present a generic method to compute thefactual accuracy of a generated data summarywith minimal user effort. We look at the prob-lem as a fact-checking task to verify the nu-merical claims in the text. The verification al-gorithm assumes that the
data used to generatethe text is available. In this paper, we describehow the proposed solution has been used toidentify incorrect claims about basketball tex-tual summaries in the context of the AccuracyShared Task at INLG 2021.
There are many of Formal Methods for testing security protocols detecting being safe
or not. Including Avispa, Casper, ProVerif, Scyther. Previously a comparisons using two
of mentioned methods (ProVerif, Scyther).
In this, research a comparison b
etween the four mentioned methods in terms of the
same used parameters in the previous comparison: working style, the modeling language,
user interface, input, and output. As a result, the user provided with options to choose the
appropriate method depending on the desired parameter.
Six different of security protocols have been tested and finally the results have been
compared; these protocols are Kao Chow Authentication Protocol, 3-D Secure Protocol,
Needham-Schroeder Public Key Protocol, Diffie–Hellman key exchange, Andrew Secure
RPC Protocol, and Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
