ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
In 2002, Evertse and Schlickewei obtained a quantitative version of the so-called Absolute Parametric Subspace Theorem. This result deals with a parametrized class of twisted heights. One of the consequences of this result is a quantitative version of the Absolute Subspace Theorem, giving an explicit upper bound for the number of subspaces containing the solutions of the Diophantine inequality under consideration. In the present paper, we further improve Evertses and Schlickeweis quantitative version of the Absolute Parametric Subspace Theorem, and deduce an improved quantitative version of the Absolute Subspace Theorem. We combine ideas from the proof of Evertse and Schlickewei (which is basically a substantial refinement of Schmidts proof of his Subspace Theorem from 1972, with ideas from Faltings and Wuestholz proof of the Subspace Theorem.
Recently, Corvaja and Zannier obtained an extension of the Subspace Theorem with arbitrary homogeneous polynomials of arbitrary degreee instead of linear forms. Their result states that the set of solutions in P^n(K) (K number field) of the inequalit
Let $Lambda(n)$ be the von Mangoldt function, and let $[t]$ be the integral part of real number $t$. In this note, we prove that for any $varepsilon>0$ the asymptotic formula $$ sum_{nle x} LambdaBig(Big[frac{x}{n}Big]Big) = xsum_{dge 1} frac{Lambda(
We show that Liebs concavity theorem holds more generally for any unitary invariant matrix function $phi:mathbf{H}_+^nrightarrow mathbb{R}_+^n$ that is concave and satisfies Holders inequality. Concretely, we prove the joint concavity of the function
Let $n$ be a positive integer. In 1915, Theisinger proved that if $nge 2$, then the $n$-th harmonic sum $sum_{k=1}^nfrac{1}{k}$ is not an integer. Let $a$ and $b$ be positive integers. In 1923, Nagell extended Theisingers theorem by showing that the
A fundamental result by Gromov and Thurston asserts that, if M is a closed hyperbolic n-manifold, then the simplicial volume |M| of M is equal to vol(M)/v_n, where v_n is a constant depending only on the dimension of M. The same result also holds for