ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
This paper presents Hierarchical Network Dissection, a general pipeline to interpret the internal representation of face-centric inference models. Using a probabilistic formulation, Hierarchical Network Dissection pairs units of the model with concepts in our Face Dictionary (a collection of facial concepts with corresponding sample images). Our pipeline is inspired by Network Dissection, a popular interpretability model for object-centric and scene-centric models. However, our formulation allows to deal with two important challenges of face-centric models that Network Dissection cannot address: (1) spacial overlap of concepts: there are different facial concepts that simultaneously occur in the same region of the image, like nose (facial part) and pointy nose (facial attribute); and (2) global concepts: there are units with affinity to concepts that do not refer to specific locations of the face (e.g. apparent age). To validate the effectiveness of our unit-concept pairing formulation, we first conduct controlled experiments on biased data. These experiments illustrate how Hierarchical Network Dissection can be used to discover bias in the training data. Then, we dissect different face-centric inference models trained on widely-used facial datasets. The results show models trained for different tasks have different internal representations. Furthermore, the interpretability results reveal some biases in the training data and some interesting characteristics of the face-centric inference tasks.
The success of recent deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) depends on learning hidden representations that can summarize the important factors of variation behind the data. However, CNNs often criticized as being black boxes that lack interpreta
Most face super-resolution methods assume that low-resolution and high-resolution manifolds have similar local geometrical structure, hence learn local models on the lowresolution manifolds (e.g. sparse or locally linear embedding models), which are
Deep neural networks (DNNs) can easily fit a random labeling of the training data with zero training error. What is the difference between DNNs trained with random labels and the ones trained with true labels? Our paper answers this question with two
There are many factors affecting visual face recognition, such as low resolution images, aging, illumination and pose variance, etc. One of the most important problem is low resolution face images which can result in bad performance on face recogniti
Videos are a rich source of high-dimensional structured data, with a wide range of interacting components at varying levels of granularity. In order to improve understanding of unconstrained internet videos, it is important to consider the role of la