اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدMomentClosure.jl: automated moment closure approximations in Julia
69
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
MomentClosure.jl is a Julia package providing automated derivation of the time-evolution equations of the moments of molecule numbers for virtually any chemical reaction network using a wide range of moment closure approximations. It extends the capabilities of modelling stochastic biochemical systems in Julia and can be particularly useful when exact analytic solutions of the chemical master equation are unavailable and when Monte Carlo simulations are computationally expensive. MomentClosure.jl is freely accessible under the MIT license. Source code and documentation are available at https://github.com/augustinas1/MomentClosure.jl
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
This is a short review of two common approximations in stochastic chemical and biochemical kinetics. It will appear as Chapter 6 in the book Quantitative Biology: Theory, Computational Methods and Examples of Models edited by Brian Munsky, Lev Tsimri
ng and Bill Hlavacek (to be published in late 2017/2018 by MIT Press). All chapter references in this article refer to chapters in the aforementioned book.
Models of codon evolution are commonly used to identify positive selection. Positive selection is typically a heterogeneous process, i.e., it acts on some branches of the evolutionary tree and not others. Previous work on DNA models showed that when
evolution occurs under a heterogeneous process it is important to consider the property of model closure, because non-closed models can give biased estimates of evolutionary processes. The existing codon models that account for the genetic code are not closed; to establish this it is enough to show that they are not linear (meaning that the sum of two codon rate matrices in the model is not a matrix in the model). This raises the concern that a single codon model fit to a heterogeneous process might mis-estimate both the effect of selection and branch lengths. Codon models are typically constructed by choosing an underlying DNA model (e.g., HKY) that acts identically and independently at each codon position, and then applying the genetic code via the parameter $omega$ to modify the rate of transitions between codons that code for different amino acids. Here we use simulation to investigate the accuracy of estimation of both the selection parameter $omega$ and branch lengths in cases where the underlying DNA process is heterogeneous but $omega$ is constant. We find that both $omega$ and branch lengths can be mis-estimated in these scenarios. Errors in $omega$ were usually less than 2% but could be as high as 17%. We also assessed if choosing different underlying DNA models had any affect on accuracy, in particular we assessed if using closed DNA models gave any advantage. However, a DNA model being closed does not imply that the codon model constructed from it is closed, and in general we found that using closed DNA models did not decrease errors in the estimation of $omega$.
Driven by advancements in high-throughput biological technologies and the growing number of sequenced genomes, the construction of in silico models at the genome scale has provided powerful tools to investigate a vast array of biological systems and
applications. Here, we review comprehensively the uses of such models in industrial and medical biotechnology, including biofuel generation, food production, and drug development. While the use of in silico models is still in its early stages for delivering to industry, significant initial successes have been achieved. For the cases presented here, genome-scale models predict engineering strategies to enhance properties of interest in an organism or to inhibit harmful mechanisms of pathogens. Going forward, genome-scale in silico models promise to extend their application and analysis scope to become a transformative tool in biotechnology.
There are many mathematical models of biochemical cell signaling pathways that contain a large number of elements (species and reactions). This is sometimes a big issue for identifying critical model elements and describing the model dynamics. Thus,
techniques of model reduction can be used as a mathematical tool in order to minimize the number of variables and parameters. In this thesis, we review some well-known methods of model reduction for cell signaling pathways. We have also developed some approaches that provide us a great step forward in model reduction. The techniques are quasi steady state approximation (QSSA), quasi equilibrium approximation (QEA), lumping of species and entropy production analysis. They are applied on protein translation pathways with microRNA mechanisms, chemical reaction networks, extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) pathways, NFkB signal transduction pathways, elongation factors EFTu and EFTs signaling pathways and Dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) pathways. The main aim of this thesis is to reduce the complex cell signaling pathway models. This provides one a better understanding of the dynamics of such models and gives an accurate approximate solution. Results show that there is a good agreement between the original models and the simplified models.
Anaerobic glycolysis in yeast perturbed by the reduction of xenobiotic ketones is studied numerically in two models which possess the same topology but different levels of complexity. By comparing both models predictions for concentrations and fluxes
as well as steady or oscillatory temporal behavior we answer the question what phenomena require what kind of minimum model abstraction. While mean concentrations and fluxes are predicted in agreement by both models we observe different domains of oscillatory behavior in parameter space. Generic properties of the glycolytic response to ketones are discussed.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
