اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدEfficiently avoiding saddle points with zero order methods: No gradients required
63
0
0.0
(
0
)
نشر من قبل
Emmanouil Vasileios Vlatakis Gkaragkounis
تاريخ النشر
2019
مجال البحث
الهندسة المعلوماتية
والبحث باللغة
English
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
We consider the case of derivative-free algorithms for non-convex optimization, also known as zero order algorithms, that use only function evaluations rather than gradients. For a wide variety of gradient approximators based on finite differences, we establish asymptotic convergence to second order stationary points using a carefully tailored application of the Stable Manifold Theorem. Regarding efficiency, we introduce a noisy zero-order method that converges to second order stationary points, i.e avoids saddle points. Our algorithm uses only $tilde{mathcal{O}}(1 / epsilon^2)$ approximate gradient calculations and, thus, it matches the converge rate guarantees of their exact gradient counterparts up to constants. In contrast to previous work, our convergence rate analysis avoids imposing additional dimension dependent slowdowns in the number of iterations required for non-convex zero order optimization.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
Nonconvex optimization algorithms with random initialization have attracted increasing attention recently. It has been showed that many first-order methods always avoid saddle points with random starting points. In this paper, we answer a question: c
an the nonconvex heavy-ball algorithms with random initialization avoid saddle points? The answer is yes! Direct using the existing proof technique for the heavy-ball algorithms is hard due to that each iteration of the heavy-ball algorithm consists of current and last points. It is impossible to formulate the algorithms as iteration like xk+1= g(xk) under some mapping g. To this end, we design a new mapping on a new space. With some transfers, the heavy-ball algorithm can be interpreted as iterations after this mapping. Theoretically, we prove that heavy-ball gradient descent enjoys larger stepsize than the gradient descent to escape saddle points to escape the saddle point. And the heavy-ball proximal point algorithm is also considered; we also proved that the algorithm can always escape the saddle point.
Recent work has shown that stochastically perturbed gradient methods can efficiently escape strict saddle points of smooth functions. We extend this body of work to nonsmooth optimization, by analyzing an inexact analogue of a stochastically perturbe
d gradient method applied to the Moreau envelope. The main conclusion is that a variety of algorithms for nonsmooth optimization can escape strict saddle points of the Moreau envelope at a controlled rate. The main technical insight is that typical algorithms applied to the proximal subproblem yield directions that approximate the gradient of the Moreau envelope in relative terms.
This paper considers the problem of understanding the exit time for trajectories of gradient-related first-order methods from saddle neighborhoods under some initial boundary conditions. Given the `flat geometry around saddle points, first-order meth
ods can struggle in escaping these regions in a fast manner due to the small magnitudes of gradients encountered. In particular, while it is known that gradient-related first-order methods escape strict-saddle neighborhoods, existing literature does not explicitly leverage the local geometry around saddle points in order to control behavior of gradient trajectories. It is in this context that this paper puts forth a rigorous geometric analysis of the gradient-descent method around strict-saddle neighborhoods using matrix perturbation theory. In doing so, it provides a key result that can be used to generate an approximate gradient trajectory for any given initial conditions. In addition, the analysis leads to a linear exit-time solution for gradient-descent method under certain necessary initial conditions for a class of strict-saddle functions.
We propose in this paper New Q-Newtons method. The update rule is very simple conceptually, for example $x_{n+1}=x_n-w_n$ where $w_n=pr_{A_n,+}(v_n)-pr_{A_n,-}(v_n)$, with $A_n= abla ^2f(x_n)+delta _n|| abla f(x_n)||^2.Id$ and $v_n=A_n^{-1}. abla f(x
_n)$. Here $delta _n$ is an appropriate real number so that $A_n$ is invertible, and $pr_{A_n,pm}$ are projections to the vector subspaces generated by eigenvectors of positive (correspondingly negative) eigenvalues of $A_n$. The main result of this paper roughly says that if $f$ is $C^3$ (can be unbounded from below) and a sequence ${x_n}$, constructed by the New Q-Newtons method from a random initial point $x_0$, {bf converges}, then the limit point is a critical point and is not a saddle point, and the convergence rate is the same as that of Newtons method. The first author has recently been successful incorporating Backtracking line search to New Q-Newtons method, thus resolving the convergence guarantee issue observed for some (non-smooth) cost functions. An application to quickly finding zeros of a univariate meromorphic function will be discussed. Various experiments are performed, against well known algorithms such as BFGS and Adaptive Cubic Regularization are presented.
We provide improved convergence rates for various emph{non-smooth} optimization problems via higher-order accelerated methods. In the case of $ell_infty$ regression, we achieves an $O(epsilon^{-4/5})$ iteration complexity, breaking the $O(epsilon^{-1
})$ barrier so far present for previous methods. We arrive at a similar rate for the problem of $ell_1$-SVM, going beyond what is attainable by first-order methods with prox-oracle access for non-smooth non-strongly convex problems. We further show how to achieve even faster rates by introducing higher-order regularization. Our results rely on recent advances in near-optimal accelerated methods for higher-order smooth convex optimization. In particular, we extend Nesterovs smoothing technique to show that the standard softmax approximation is not only smooth in the usual sense, but also emph{higher-order} smooth. With this observation in hand, we provide the first example of higher-order acceleration techniques yielding faster rates for emph{non-smooth} optimization, to the best of our knowledge.
الأسئلة المقترحة
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
