اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدVector Autoregressive Models With Measurement Errors for Testing Ganger Causality
132
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
This paper develops a method for estimating parameters of a vector autoregression (VAR) observed in white noise. The estimation method assumes the noise variance matrix is known and does not require any iterative process. This study provides consistent estimators and shows the asymptotic distribution of the parameters required for conducting tests of Granger causality. Methods in the existing statistical literature cannot be used for testing Granger causality, since under the null hypothesis the model becomes unidentifiable. Measurement error effects on parameter estimates were evaluated by using computational simulations. The results show that the proposed approach produces empirical false positive rates close to the adopted nominal level (even for small samples) and has a good performance around the null hypothesis. The applicability and usefulness of the proposed approach are illustrated using a functional magnetic resonance imaging dataset.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
Distribution estimation for noisy data via density deconvolution is a notoriously difficult problem for typical noise distributions like Gaussian. We develop a density deconvolution estimator based on quadratic programming (QP) that can achieve bette
r estimation than kernel density deconvolution methods. The QP approach appears to have a more favorable regularization tradeoff between oversmoothing vs. oscillation, especially at the tails of the distribution. An additional advantage is that it is straightforward to incorporate a number of common density constraints such as nonnegativity, integration-to-one, unimodality, tail convexity, tail monotonicity, and support constraints. We demonstrate that the QP approach has outstanding estimation performance relative to existing methods. Its performance is superior when only the universally applicable nonnegativity and integration-to-one constraints are incorporated, and incorporating additional common constraints when applicable (e.g., nonnegative support, unimodality, tail monotonicity or convexity, etc.) can further substantially improve the estimation.
Trivariate Granger causality analysis seeks to distinguish between true causality and spurious causality results from the topology of the system. However, this analysis is sensitive both to the choice of test criteria and the presence of noise, and t
his can lead to incorrect inference of causality: either to infer causality that does not exist (spurious causality), or to fail to infer causality that does exist (unidentified causality). Here we analyse the effects of the choice of test criteria and the presence of noise and give general conditions under which incorrect inference is likely to occur. By studying the test criteria (likelihood ratio, Lagrange multiplier, Rao efficient scoring and Wald), we demonstrate that Rao efficient scoring and Wald tests are statistically indistinguishable and that for small sample sizes they offer a the lowest likelihood of spurious causality, with the likelihood ratio test offering the lowest likelihood of unidentified causality. We also show the sample size at which convergence between these tests occurs. We also give empirical results for intrinsic noise (in a variable) and extrinsic noise (between an variable and a observer), with a varying signal-to-noise ratio for each variable, showing that for intrinsic noise a strong dependence on the signal-to-noise ratio of the last variable exists, and for extrinsic noise no dependence the true topology exists.
Beta regression models provide an adequate approach for modeling continuous outcomes limited to the interval (0,1). This paper deals with an extension of beta regression models that allow for explanatory variables to be measured with error. The struc
tural approach, in which the covariates measured with error are assumed to be random variables, is employed. Three estimation methods are presented, namely maximum likelihood, maximum pseudo-likelihood and regression calibration. Monte Carlo simulations are used to evaluate the performance of the proposed estimators and the naive estimator. Also, a residual analysis for beta regression models with measurement errors is proposed. The results are illustrated in a real data set.
Instrumental variable methods can identify causal effects even when the treatment and outcome are confounded. We study the problem of imperfect measurements of the binary instrumental variable, treatment or outcome. We first consider non-differential
measurement errors, that is, the mis-measured variable does not depend on other variables given its true value. We show that the measurement error of the instrumental variable does not bias the estimate, the measurement error of the treatment biases the estimate away from zero, and the measurement error of the outcome biases the estimate toward zero. Moreover, we derive sharp bounds on the causal effects without additional assumptions. These bounds are informative because they exclude zero. We then consider differential measurement errors, and focus on sensitivity analyses in those settings.
Cognitive Diagnosis Models (CDMs) are a special family of discrete latent variable models widely used in educational, psychological and social sciences. In many applications of CDMs, certain hierarchical structures among the latent attributes are ass
umed by researchers to characterize their dependence structure. Specifically, a directed acyclic graph is used to specify hierarchical constraints on the allowable configurations of the discrete latent attributes. In this paper, we consider the important yet unaddressed problem of testing the existence of latent hierarchical structures in CDMs. We first introduce the concept of testability of hierarchical structures in CDMs and present sufficient conditions. Then we study the asymptotic behaviors of the likelihood ratio test (LRT) statistic, which is widely used for testing nested models. Due to the irregularity of the problem, the asymptotic distribution of LRT becomes nonstandard and tends to provide unsatisfactory finite sample performance under practical conditions. We provide statistical insights on such failures, and propose to use parametric bootstrap to perform the testing. We also demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of parametric bootstrap for testing the latent hierarchies over non-parametric bootstrap and the naive Chi-squared test through comprehensive simulations and an educational assessment dataset.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
