اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدHypothesis Testing for Hierarchical Structures in Cognitive Diagnosis Models
91
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Cognitive Diagnosis Models (CDMs) are a special family of discrete latent variable models widely used in educational, psychological and social sciences. In many applications of CDMs, certain hierarchical structures among the latent attributes are assumed by researchers to characterize their dependence structure. Specifically, a directed acyclic graph is used to specify hierarchical constraints on the allowable configurations of the discrete latent attributes. In this paper, we consider the important yet unaddressed problem of testing the existence of latent hierarchical structures in CDMs. We first introduce the concept of testability of hierarchical structures in CDMs and present sufficient conditions. Then we study the asymptotic behaviors of the likelihood ratio test (LRT) statistic, which is widely used for testing nested models. Due to the irregularity of the problem, the asymptotic distribution of LRT becomes nonstandard and tends to provide unsatisfactory finite sample performance under practical conditions. We provide statistical insights on such failures, and propose to use parametric bootstrap to perform the testing. We also demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of parametric bootstrap for testing the latent hierarchies over non-parametric bootstrap and the naive Chi-squared test through comprehensive simulations and an educational assessment dataset.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
Cognitive Diagnosis Models (CDMs) are a special family of discrete latent variable models that are widely used in modern educational, psychological, social and biological sciences. A key component of CDMs is a binary $Q$-matrix characterizing the dep
endence structure between the items and the latent attributes. Additionally, researchers also assume in many applications certain hierarchical structures among the latent attributes to characterize their dependence. In most CDM applications, the attribute-attribute hierarchical structures, the item-attribute $Q$-matrix, the item-level diagnostic model, as well as the number of latent attributes, need to be fully or partially pre-specified, which however may be subjective and misspecified as noted by many recent studies. This paper considers the problem of jointly learning these latent and hierarchical structures in CDMs from observed data with minimal model assumptions. Specifically, a penalized likelihood approach is proposed to select the number of attributes and estimate the latent and hierarchical structures simultaneously. An efficient expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm and a latent structure recovery algorithm are developed, and statistical consistency theory is also established under mild conditions. The good performance of the proposed method is illustrated by simulation studies and a real data application in educational assessment.
Cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) are useful statistical tools to provide rich information relevant for intervention and learning. As a popular approach to estimate and make inference of CDMs, the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm is widely u
sed in practice. However, when the number of attributes, $K$, is large, the existing MCMC algorithm may become time-consuming, due to the fact that $O(2^K)$ calculations are usually needed in the process of MCMC sampling to get the conditional distribution for each attribute profile. To overcome this computational issue, motivated by Culpepper and Hudson (2018), we propose a computationally efficient sequential Gibbs sampling method, which needs $O(K)$ calculations to sample each attribute profile. We use simulation and real data examples to show the good finite-sample performance of the proposed sequential Gibbs sampling, and its advantage over existing methods.
We develop a unified approach to hypothesis testing for various types of widely used functional linear models, such as scalar-on-function, function-on-function and function-on-scalar models. In addition, the proposed test applies to models of mixed t
ypes, such as models with both functional and scalar predictors. In contrast with most existing methods that rest on the large-sample distributions of test statistics, the proposed method leverages the technique of bootstrapping max statistics and exploits the variance decay property that is an inherent feature of functional data, to improve the empirical power of tests especially when the sample size is limited and the signal is relatively weak. Theoretical guarantees on the validity and consistency of the proposed test are provided uniformly for a class of test statistics.
There has been growing interest in recent years in Q-matrix based cognitive diagnosis models. Parameter estimation and respondent classification under these models may suffer due to identifiability issues. Non-identifiability can be described by a pa
rtition separating attribute profiles into groups of those with identical likelihoods. Marginal identifiability concerns the identifiability of individual attributes. Maximum likelihood estimation of the proportion of respondents within each equivalence class is consistent, making possible a new measure of assessment quality reporting the proportion of respondents for whom each individual attribute is marginally identifiable. Arising from this is a new posterior-based classification method adjusting for non-identifiability.
Hierarchical inference in (generalized) regression problems is powerful for finding significant groups or even single covariates, especially in high-dimensional settings where identifiability of the entire regression parameter vector may be ill-posed
. The general method proceeds in a fully data-driven and adaptive way from large to small groups or singletons of covariates, depending on the signal strength and the correlation structure of the design matrix. We propose a novel hierarchical multiple testing adjustment that can be used in combination with any significance test for a group of covariates to perform hierarchical inference. Our adjustment passes on the significance level of certain hypotheses that could not be rejected and is shown to guarantee strong control of the familywise error rate. Our method is at least as powerful as a so-called depth-wise hierarchical Bonferroni adjustment. It provides a substantial gain in power over other previously proposed inheritance hierarchical procedures if the underlying alternative hypotheses occur sparsely along a few branches in the tree-structured hierarchy.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
