Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userEvidence-based Fact-Checking of Health-related Claims
فحص الحقائق القائمة على الأدلة للمطالبات المتعلقة بالصحة
297
0 0
0.0
(
0
)
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
تلقت مهمة التحقق من صحة المطالبات في الوثائق النصية، أو فحص الحقائق، اهتماما كبيرا في السنوات الأخيرة. تحتوي العديد من مجموعات بيانات الحقائق القائمة على الأدلة الموجودة على المطالبات الاصطناعية والنماذج المدربة على هذه البيانات قد لا تتمكن من التحقق من مطالبات العالم الحقيقي. وعليا بعض الدراسات التي تعالجت التحقق من الحقائق القائمة على الأدلة للمطالبات المتعلقة بالصحة التي تتطلب الخبرات الطبية أو الأدلة من الأدبيات العلمية. في هذه الورقة، نقدم صحة، مجموعة بيانات جديدة لفحص الحقائق القائم على الأدلة للمطالبات المتعلقة بالصحة التي تسمح بدراسة صلاحية المطالبات في العالم الحقيقي من خلال تقييم صدقها ضد المقالات العلمية. باستخدام طريقة إنشاء بيانات ثلاث خطوات، استجبت لأول مرة مطالبات عالمية حقيقية من المقتطفات التي تم إرجاعها بواسطة محرك بحث للأسئلة حول CovID-19. ثم استرجاعنا تلقائيا وإعادة صياغة الأوراق العلمية ذات الصلة باستخدام نموذج T5 القائم على الصلة. وأخيرا، تم تفاح العلاقات بين كل بيان أدلة والمطالبة المرتبطة يدويا كدعم ودحض ومحايد. للتحقق من صحة مجموعة البيانات التي تم إنشاؤها من 14،330 أزواج مطالبة الأدلة، طورت نماذج خط الأساس بناء على نماذج اللغة المحددة مسبقا. أظهرت تجاربنا أن التدريبات التدريبية العميقة في المطالبات الطبية في العالم الحقيقي تعمل بشكل كبير على تحسين الأداء مقارنة بالنماذج المدربة على مطالبات الاصطناعية والمفتوحة. تشير النتائج الخاصة بنا والتحليلات اليدوية إلى أن صحية يوفر مجموعة بيانات واقعية وصعبة للجهود المستقبلية بشأن التحقق من الحقائق القائمة على الأدلة للمطالبات المتعلقة بالصحة. تتوفر DataSet، التعليمات البرمجية المصدر، لوحة المتصدرين في https://github.com/sarrouti/healthver.
The task of verifying the truthfulness of claims in textual documents, or fact-checking, has received significant attention in recent years. Many existing evidence-based factchecking datasets contain synthetic claims and the models trained on these data might not be able to verify real-world claims. Particularly few studies addressed evidence-based fact-checking of health-related claims that require medical expertise or evidence from the scientific literature. In this paper, we introduce HEALTHVER, a new dataset for evidence-based fact-checking of health-related claims that allows to study the validity of real-world claims by evaluating their truthfulness against scientific articles. Using a three-step data creation method, we first retrieved real-world claims from snippets returned by a search engine for questions about COVID-19. Then we automatically retrieved and re-ranked relevant scientific papers using a T5 relevance-based model. Finally, the relations between each evidence statement and the associated claim were manually annotated as SUPPORT, REFUTE and NEUTRAL. To validate the created dataset of 14,330 evidence-claim pairs, we developed baseline models based on pretrained language models. Our experiments showed that training deep learning models on real-world medical claims greatly improves performance compared to models trained on synthetic and open-domain claims. Our results and manual analysis suggest that HEALTHVER provides a realistic and challenging dataset for future efforts on evidence-based fact-checking of health-related claims. The dataset, source code, and a leaderboard are available at https://github.com/sarrouti/healthver.
References used
https://aclanthology.org/
rate research
Read More
Automated fact-checking on a large-scale is a challenging task that has not been studied systematically until recently. Large noisy document collections like the web or news articles make the task more difficult. We describe a three-stage automated f
act-checking system, named Quin+, using evidence retrieval and selection methods. We demonstrate that using dense passage representations leads to much higher evidence recall in a noisy setting. We also propose two sentence selection approaches, an embedding-based selection using a dense retrieval model, and a sequence labeling approach for context-aware selection. Quin+ is able to verify open-domain claims using results from web search engines.
Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER) is a recently introduced task that consists of the following subtasks (i) document retrieval, (ii) sentence retrieval, and (iii) claim verification. In this work, we focus on the subtask of sentence retrieval.
Specifically, we propose an evidence-aware transformer-based model that outperforms all other models in terms of FEVER score by using a subset of training instances. In addition, we conduct a large experimental study to get a better understanding of the problem, while we summarize our findings by presenting future research challenges.
As part of the FEVEROUS shared task, we developed a robust and finely tuned architecture to handle the joint retrieval and entailment on text data as well as structured data like tables. We proposed two training schemes to tackle the hurdles inherent
to multi-hop multi-modal datasets. The first one allows having a robust retrieval of full evidence sets, while the second one enables entailment to take full advantage of noisy evidence inputs. In addition, our work has revealed important insights and potential avenue of research for future improvement on this kind of dataset. In preliminary evaluation on the FEVEROUS shared task test set, our system achieves 0.271 FEVEROUS score, with 0.4258 evidence recall and 0.5607 entailment accuracy.
Table-based fact verification task aims to verify whether the given statement is supported by the given semi-structured table. Symbolic reasoning with logical operations plays a crucial role in this task. Existing methods leverage programs that conta
in rich logical information to enhance the verification process. However, due to the lack of fully supervised signals in the program generation process, spurious programs can be derived and employed, which leads to the inability of the model to catch helpful logical operations. To address the aforementioned problems, in this work, we formulate the table-based fact verification task as an evidence retrieval and reasoning framework, proposing the Logic-level Evidence Retrieval and Graph-based Verification network (LERGV). Specifically, we first retrieve logic-level program-like evidence from the given table and statement as supplementary evidence for the table. After that, we construct a logic-level graph to capture the logical relations between entities and functions in the retrieved evidence, and design a graph-based verification network to perform logic-level graph-based reasoning based on the constructed graph to classify the final entailment relation. Experimental results on the large-scale benchmark TABFACT show the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
In this paper, we propose a novel fact checking and verification system to check claims against Wikipedia content. Our system retrieves relevant Wikipedia pages using Anserini, uses BERT-large-cased question answering model to select correct evidence
, and verifies claims using XLNET natural language inference model by comparing it with the evidence. Table cell evidence is obtained through looking for entity-matching cell values and TAPAS table question answering model. The pipeline utilizes zero-shot capabilities of existing models and all the models used in the pipeline requires no additional training. Our system got a FEVEROUS score of 0.06 and a label accuracy of 0.39 in FEVEROUS challenge.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
