Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userSUBSUME: A Dataset for Subjective Summary Extraction from Wikipedia Documents
STARM: مجموعة بيانات لاستخراج الموجز الذاتي من وثائق ويكيبيديا
418
0 0
0.0
(
0
)
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
تتطلب العديد من التطبيقات توليد ملخصات مصممة خصيصا لاحتياجات معلومات المستخدم، أي نواياها. الأساليب التي تعبر عن النية عبر استعلامات المستخدم الصريحة تسقط قصيرة عند التفسير الاستعلام هو شخصي. توجد عدة مجموعات من مجموعات البيانات للتخصيص مع النوايا الموضوعية حيث، لكل وثيقة ونوايا (E.G.، Weather ")، تكفي موجز واحد لجميع المستخدمين. لا توجد مجموعات البيانات، ومع ذلك، بالنسبة للمؤلفة الذاتية (E.G.، الأماكن المثيرة للاهتمام ") حيث سيقدم المستخدمون المختلفون ملخصات مختلفة. نحن نقدم العانة، أول مجموعة البيانات لتقييم أنظمة استخراج الملخص الذاتي. تحتوي STALUME على ثلاثة أفراد (وثيقة، نية، ملخص) ثلاثة توائم أكثر من 48 صفحة ويكيبيديا، مع عشرة نوبة ذاتي اختلاف ذاتي، والتي توفرها 103 فردا على الترك الميكانيكي. نوضح إحصائيا أن النوايا في SARMENT تختلف بشكل منهجي في الذاتية. للإشارة إلى فائدة SUTTUME، نستكشف مجموعة من خوارزميات أساسية لتلخيص استخراجي ذاتي وإظهار أن (I) كما هو متوقع، فإن النهج القائمة على سبيل المثال، من الأفضل أن تلتقط النوايا ذاتية من تلك القائمة على الاستعلام، و (2) هناك نطاق واسع لتحسينه خوارزميات الأساس، وبالتالي تحفز المزيد من الأبحاث حول هذه المشكلة الصعبة.
Many applications require generation of summaries tailored to the user's information needs, i.e., their intent. Methods that express intent via explicit user queries fall short when query interpretation is subjective. Several datasets exist for summarization with objective intents where, for each document and intent (e.g., weather''), a single summary suffices for all users. No datasets exist, however, for subjective intents (e.g., interesting places'') where different users will provide different summaries. We present SUBSUME, the first dataset for evaluation of SUBjective SUMmary Extraction systems. SUBSUME contains 2,200 (document, intent, summary) triplets over 48 Wikipedia pages, with ten intents of varying subjectivity, provided by 103 individuals over Mechanical Turk. We demonstrate statistically that the intents in SUBSUME vary systematically in subjectivity. To indicate SUBSUME's usefulness, we explore a collection of baseline algorithms for subjective extractive summarization and show that (i) as expected, example-based approaches better capture subjective intents than query-based ones, and (ii) there is ample scope for improving upon the baseline algorithms, thereby motivating further research on this challenging problem.
References used
https://aclanthology.org/
rate research
Read More
This study introduces and analyzes WikiTalkEdit, a dataset of conversations and edit histories from Wikipedia, for research in online cooperation and conversation modeling. The dataset comprises dialog triplets from the Wikipedia Talk pages, and edit
ing actions on the corresponding articles being discussed. We show how the data supports the classic understanding of style matching, where positive emotion and the use of first-person pronouns predict a positive emotional change in a Wikipedia contributor. However, they do not predict editorial behavior. On the other hand, feedback invoking evidentiality and criticism, and references to Wikipedia's community norms, is more likely to persuade the contributor to perform edits but is less likely to lead to a positive emotion. We developed baseline classifiers trained on pre-trained RoBERTa features that can predict editorial change with an F1 score of .54, as compared to an F1 score of .66 for predicting emotional change. A diagnostic analysis of persisting errors is also provided. We conclude with possible applications and recommendations for future work. The dataset is publicly available for the research community at https://github.com/kj2013/WikiTalkEdit/.
Cross-lingual summarization is a challenging task for which there are no cross-lingual scientific resources currently available. To overcome the lack of a high-quality resource, we present a new dataset for monolingual and cross-lingual summarization
considering the English-German pair. We collect high-quality, real-world cross-lingual data from Spektrum der Wissenschaft, which publishes human-written German scientific summaries of English science articles on various subjects. The generated Spektrum dataset is small; therefore, we harvest a similar dataset from the Wikipedia Science Portal to complement it. The Wikipedia dataset consists of English and German articles, which can be used for monolingual and cross-lingual summarization. Furthermore, we present a quantitative analysis of the datasets and results of empirical experiments with several existing extractive and abstractive summarization models. The results suggest the viability and usefulness of the proposed dataset for monolingual and cross-lingual summarization.
Cross-document event coreference resolution is a foundational task for NLP applications involving multi-text processing. However, existing corpora for this task are scarce and relatively small, while annotating only modest-size clusters of documents
belonging to the same topic. To complement these resources and enhance future research, we present Wikipedia Event Coreference (WEC), an efficient methodology for gathering a large-scale dataset for cross-document event coreference from Wikipedia, where coreference links are not restricted within predefined topics. We apply this methodology to the English Wikipedia and extract our large-scale WEC-Eng dataset. Notably, our dataset creation method is generic and can be applied with relatively little effort to other Wikipedia languages. To set baseline results, we develop an algorithm that adapts components of state-of-the-art models for within-document coreference resolution to the cross-document setting. Our model is suitably efficient and outperforms previously published state-of-the-art results for the task.
We annotate 17,000 SNS posts with both the writer's subjective emotional intensity and the reader's objective one to construct a Japanese emotion analysis dataset. In this study, we explore the difference between the emotional intensity of the writer
and that of the readers with this dataset. We found that the reader cannot fully detect the emotions of the writer, especially anger and trust. In addition, experimental results in estimating the emotional intensity show that it is more difficult to estimate the writer's subjective labels than the readers'. The large gap between the subjective and objective emotions imply the complexity of the mapping from a post to the subjective emotion intensities, which also leads to a lower performance with machine learning models.
In Romanian language there are some resources for automatic text comprehension, but for Emotion Detection, not lexicon-based, there are none. To cover this gap, we extracted data from Twitter and created the first dataset containing tweets annotated
with five types of emotions: joy, fear, sadness, anger and neutral, with the intent of being used for opinion mining and analysis tasks. In this article we present some features of our novel dataset, and create a benchmark to achieve the first supervised machine learning model for automatic Emotion Detection in Romanian short texts. We investigate the performance of four classical machine learning models: Multinomial Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Classification and Linear Support Vector Classification. We also investigate more modern approaches like fastText, which makes use of subword information. Lastly, we fine-tune the Romanian BERT for text classification and our experiments show that the BERT-based model has the best performance for the task of Emotion Detection from Romanian tweets. Keywords: Emotion Detection, Twitter, Romanian, Supervised Machine Learning
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
