Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userA Dataset of Information-Seeking Questions and Answers Anchored in Research Papers
مجموعة بيانات من الأسئلة التي تسعى للحصول على معلومات وإجابات الراسية في أوراق البحث
271
0 0
0.0
(
0
)
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
قراء قراء أوراق البحث الأكاديمي غالبا ما يقرؤون بهدف الإجابة على أسئلة محددة. يمكن للإجابة على الأسئلة التي يمكن أن ترد على هذه الأسئلة إجراء استهلاك المحتوى أكثر كفاءة بكثير. ومع ذلك، فإن بناء هذه الأدوات يتطلب بيانات تعكس صعوبة المهمة الناشئة عن التفكير المعقد حول المطالبات المقدمة في أجزاء متعددة من الورقة. في المقابل، تحتوي الأسئلة الحالية على المعلومات المتعلقة بالمعلومات الرد على مجموعات البيانات عادة أسئلة حول المعلومات العامة من النوع العامل. لذلك نحن نقدم QASPER، مجموعة بيانات من 5049 سؤالا أكثر من 1585 ورقة معالجة اللغة الطبيعية. يتم كتابة كل سؤال بممارس NLP الذي قرأ فقط عنوان وإجراء ملخص للورقة المقابلة، والسؤال يسعى للحصول على معلومات موجودة في النص الكامل. ثم تتم الإجابة على الأسئلة من قبل مجموعة منفصلة من ممارسين NLP الذين يقدمون أيضا الأدلة الداعمة للإجابات. نجد أن النماذج الحالية التي تعمل بشكل جيد على مهام ضمان الجودة الأخرى لا تؤدي بشكل جيد في الإجابة على هذه الأسئلة، وأيضا الأد من البشر بنسبة 27 نقطة على الأقل عند الإجابة عليها من الأوراق بأكملها، تحفز المزيد من الأبحاث في الوثائق التي تأسست، حيث تسعى للحصول على المعلومات، والتي تم تصميم DataSet لدينا لتسهيل.
Readers of academic research papers often read with the goal of answering specific questions. Question Answering systems that can answer those questions can make consumption of the content much more efficient. However, building such tools requires data that reflect the difficulty of the task arising from complex reasoning about claims made in multiple parts of a paper. In contrast, existing information-seeking question answering datasets usually contain questions about generic factoid-type information. We therefore present Qasper, a dataset of 5049 questions over 1585 Natural Language Processing papers. Each question is written by an NLP practitioner who read only the title and abstract of the corresponding paper, and the question seeks information present in the full text. The questions are then answered by a separate set of NLP practitioners who also provide supporting evidence to answers. We find that existing models that do well on other QA tasks do not perform well on answering these questions, underperforming humans by at least 27 F1 points when answering them from entire papers, motivating further research in document-grounded, information-seeking QA, which our dataset is designed to facilitate.
References used
https://aclanthology.org/
rate research
Read More
Information seeking is an essential step for open-domain question answering to efficiently gather evidence from a large corpus. Recently, iterative approaches have been proven to be effective for complex questions, by recursively retrieving new evide
nce at each step. However, almost all existing iterative approaches use predefined strategies, either applying the same retrieval function multiple times or fixing the order of different retrieval functions, which cannot fulfill the diverse requirements of various questions. In this paper, we propose a novel adaptive information-seeking strategy for open-domain question answering, namely AISO. Specifically, the whole retrieval and answer process is modeled as a partially observed Markov decision process, where three types of retrieval operations (e.g., BM25, DPR, and hyperlink) and one answer operation are defined as actions. According to the learned policy, AISO could adaptively select a proper retrieval action to seek the missing evidence at each step, based on the collected evidence and the reformulated query, or directly output the answer when the evidence set is sufficient for the question. Experiments on SQuAD Open and HotpotQA fullwiki, which serve as single-hop and multi-hop open-domain QA benchmarks, show that AISO outperforms all baseline methods with predefined strategies in terms of both retrieval and answer evaluations.
In this paper, we define and evaluate a methodology for extracting history-dependent spatial questions from visual dialogues. We say that a question is history-dependent if it requires (parts of) its dialogue history to be interpreted. We argue that
some kinds of visual questions define a context upon which a follow-up spatial question relies. We call the question that restricts the context: trigger, and we call the spatial question that requires the trigger question to be answered: zoomer. We automatically extract different trigger and zoomer pairs based on the visual property that the questions rely on (e.g. color, number). We manually annotate the automatically extracted trigger and zoomer pairs to verify which zoomers require their trigger. We implement a simple baseline architecture based on a SOTA multimodal encoder. Our results reveal that there is much room for improvement for answering history-dependent questions.
People utilize online forums to either look for information or to contribute it. Because of their growing popularity, certain online forums have been created specifically to provide support, assistance, and opinions for people suffering from mental i
llness. Depression is one of the most frequent psychological illnesses worldwide. People communicate more with online forums to find answers for their psychological disease. However, there is no mechanism to measure the severity of depression in each post and give higher importance to those who are diagnosed more severely depressed. Despite the fact that numerous researches based on online forum data and the identification of depression have been conducted, the severity of depression is rarely explored. In addition, the absence of datasets will stymie the development of novel diagnostic procedures for practitioners. From this study, we offer a dataset to support research on depression severity evaluation. The computational approach to measure an automatic process, identified severity of depression here is quite novel approach. Nonetheless, this elaborate measuring severity of depression in online forum posts is needed to ensure the measurement scales used in our research meets the expected norms of scientific research.
Existing relation extraction (RE) methods typically focus on extracting relational facts between entity pairs within single sentences or documents. However, a large quantity of relational facts in knowledge bases can only be inferred across documents
in practice. In this work, we present the problem of cross-document RE, making an initial step towards knowledge acquisition in the wild. To facilitate the research, we construct the first human-annotated cross-document RE dataset CodRED. Compared to existing RE datasets, CodRED presents two key challenges: Given two entities, (1) it requires finding the relevant documents that can provide clues for identifying their relations; (2) it requires reasoning over multiple documents to extract the relational facts. We conduct comprehensive experiments to show that CodRED is challenging to existing RE methods including strong BERT-based models.
We present GerDaLIR, a German Dataset for Legal Information Retrieval based on case documents from the open legal information platform Open Legal Data. The dataset consists of 123K queries, each labelled with at least one relevant document in a colle
ction of 131K case documents. We conduct several baseline experiments including BM25 and a state-of-the-art neural re-ranker. With our dataset, we aim to provide a standardized benchmark for German LIR and promote open research in this area. Beyond that, our dataset comprises sufficient training data to be used as a downstream task for German or multilingual language models.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
