Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userAbusive Language on Social Media Through the Legal Looking Glass
لغة مسيئة على وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي من خلال الزجاج المظهر القانوني
457
0 0
0.0
(
0
)
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
اللغة المسيئة هي ظاهرة متزايدة على منصات وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي. يمكن أن تصل آثارها إلى ما بعد السياق عبر الإنترنت، والمساهمة في الضغط العقلي أو العاطفي على المستخدمين. يمكن للأدوات التلقائية للكشف عن سوء المعاملة تخفيف المشكلة. في الممارسة العملية، تعتمد تطوير طرق تلقائية للكشف عن لغة مسيئة على بيانات ذات نوعية جيدة. ومع ذلك، هناك حاليا نقص المعايير لإنشاء مجموعات البيانات في هذا المجال. وتشمل هذه المعايير تعريفات لما يعتبر لغة مسيئة وإرشادات التوضيحية والإبلاغ عن العملية. تقدم هذه الورقة إطارا شرحا مستوحى من المفاهيم القانونية لتحديد اللغة المسيئة في سياق المضايقات عبر الإنترنت. يستخدم الإطار مقياسا Likert 7 نقاط للوضع العلامات بدلا من التسميات الفئة. نحن نقود أيضا Alyt - مجموعة بيانات من لغة مسيئة على YouTube. يتضمن Alyt تعليقات YouTube باللغة الإنجليزية من مقاطع الفيديو حول موضوعات مختلفة مثيرة للجدل ومسمى طلاب القانون. تم أخذ عينات من التعليقات من البيانات التي تم جمعها فعليا، دون أساليب اصطناعية لزيادة المحتوى المسيء. تصف الورقة عملية التوضيحية بدقة، بما في ذلك جميع المبادئ التوجيهية وخطوات التدريب.
Abusive language is a growing phenomenon on social media platforms. Its effects can reach beyond the online context, contributing to mental or emotional stress on users. Automatic tools for detecting abuse can alleviate the issue. In practice, developing automated methods to detect abusive language relies on good quality data. However, there is currently a lack of standards for creating datasets in the field. These standards include definitions of what is considered abusive language, annotation guidelines and reporting on the process. This paper introduces an annotation framework inspired by legal concepts to define abusive language in the context of online harassment. The framework uses a 7-point Likert scale for labelling instead of class labels. We also present ALYT -- a dataset of Abusive Language on YouTube. ALYT includes YouTube comments in English extracted from videos on different controversial topics and labelled by Law students. The comments were sampled from the actual collected data, without artificial methods for increasing the abusive content. The paper describes the annotation process thoroughly, including all its guidelines and training steps.
References used
https://aclanthology.org/
rate research
Read More
This paper describes the Helsinki--Ljubljana contribution to the VarDial 2021 shared task on social media variety geolocation. Following our successful participation at VarDial 2020, we again propose constrained and unconstrained systems based on the
BERT architecture. In this paper, we report experiments with different tokenization settings and different pre-trained models, and we contrast our parameter-free regression approach with various classification schemes proposed by other participants at VarDial 2020. Both the code and the best-performing pre-trained models are made freely available.
Social media texts such as blog posts, comments, and tweets often contain offensive languages including racial hate speech comments, personal attacks, and sexual harassment. Detecting inappropriate use of language is, therefore, of utmost importance
for the safety of the users as well as for suppressing hateful conduct and aggression. Existing approaches to this problem are mostly available for resource-rich languages such as English and German. In this paper, we characterize the offensive language in Nepali, a low-resource language, highlighting the challenges that need to be addressed for processing Nepali social media text. We also present experiments for detecting offensive language using supervised machine learning. Besides contributing the first baseline approaches of detecting offensive language in Nepali, we also release human annotated data sets to encourage future research on this crucial topic.
Cross-language authorship attribution is the challenging task of classifying documents by bilingual authors where the training documents are written in a different language than the evaluation documents. Traditional solutions rely on either translati
on to enable the use of single-language features, or language-independent feature extraction methods. More recently, transformer-based language models like BERT can also be pre-trained on multiple languages, making them intuitive candidates for cross-language classifiers which have not been used for this task yet. We perform extensive experiments to benchmark the performance of three different approaches to a smallscale cross-language authorship attribution experiment: (1) using language-independent features with traditional classification models, (2) using multilingual pre-trained language models, and (3) using machine translation to allow single-language classification. For the language-independent features, we utilize universal syntactic features like part-of-speech tags and dependency graphs, and multilingual BERT as a pre-trained language model. We use a small-scale social media comments dataset, closely reflecting practical scenarios. We show that applying machine translation drastically increases the performance of almost all approaches, and that the syntactic features in combination with the translation step achieve the best overall classification performance. In particular, we demonstrate that pre-trained language models are outperformed by traditional models in small scale authorship attribution problems for every language combination analyzed in this paper.
The framing of political issues can influence policy and public opinion. Even though the public plays a key role in creating and spreading frames, little is known about how ordinary people on social media frame political issues. By creating a new dat
aset of immigration-related tweets labeled for multiple framing typologies from political communication theory, we develop supervised models to detect frames. We demonstrate how users' ideology and region impact framing choices, and how a message's framing influences audience responses. We find that the more commonly-used issue-generic frames obscure important ideological and regional patterns that are only revealed by immigration-specific frames. Furthermore, frames oriented towards human interests, culture, and politics are associated with higher user engagement. This large-scale analysis of a complex social and linguistic phenomenon contributes to both NLP and social science research.
In this paper we study pejorative language, an under-explored topic in computational linguistics. Unlike existing models of offensive language and hate speech, pejorative language manifests itself primarily at the lexical level, and describes a word
that is used with a negative connotation, making it different from offensive language or other more studied categories. Pejorativity is also context-dependent: the same word can be used with or without pejorative connotations, thus pejorativity detection is essentially a problem similar to word sense disambiguation. We leverage online dictionaries to build a multilingual lexicon of pejorative terms for English, Spanish, Italian, and Romanian. We additionally release a dataset of tweets annotated for pejorative use. Based on these resources, we present an analysis of the usage and occurrence of pejorative words in social media, and present an attempt to automatically disambiguate pejorative usage in our dataset.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
