Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userToward Evaluating Re-identification Risks in the Local Privacy Model
364
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Takao Murakami
Publication date
2020
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
LDP (Local Differential Privacy) has recently attracted much attention as a metric of data privacy that prevents the inference of personal data from obfuscated data in the local model. However, there are scenarios in which the adversary wants to perform re-identification attacks to link the obfuscated data to users in this model. LDP can cause excessive obfuscation and destroy the utility in these scenarios because it is not designed to directly prevent re-identification. In this paper, we propose a measure of re-identification risks, which we call PIE (Personal Information Entropy). The PIE is designed so that it directly prevents re-identification attacks in the local model. It lower-bounds the lowest possible re-identification error probability (i.e., Bayes error probability) of the adversary. We analyze the relation between LDP and the PIE, and analyze the PIE and utility in distribution estimation for two obfuscation mechanisms providing LDP. Through experiments, we show that when we consider re-identification as a privacy risk, LDP can cause excessive obfuscation and destroy the utility. Then we show that the PIE can be used to guarantee low re-identification risks for the local obfuscation mechanisms while keeping high utility.
rate research
Read More
Local Differential Privacy (LDP) is popularly used in practice for privacy-preserving data collection. Although existing LDP protocols offer high utility for large user populations (100,000 or more users), they perform poorly in scenarios with small user populations (such as those in the cybersecurity domain) and lack perturbation mechanisms that are effective for both ordinal and non-ordinal item sequences while protecting sequence length and content simultaneously. In this paper, we address the small user population problem by introducing the concept of Condensed Local Differential Privacy (CLDP) as a specialization of LDP, and develop a suite of CLDP protocols that offer desirable statistical utility while preserving privacy. Our protocols support different types of client data, ranging from ordinal data types in finite metric spaces (numeric malware infection statistics), to non-ordinal items (O
Federated Learning (FL) allows multiple participants to train machine learning models collaboratively by keeping their datasets local and only exchanging model updates. Alas, recent work highlighted several privacy and robustness weaknesses in FL, presenting, respectively, membership/property inference and backdoor attacks. In this paper, we investigate to what extent Differential Privacy (DP) can be used to protect not only privacy but also robustness in FL. We present a first-of-its-kind empirical evaluation of Local and Central Differential Privacy (LDP/CDP) techniques in FL, assessing their feasibility and effectiveness. We show that both DP variants do defend against backdoor attacks, with varying levels of protection and utility, and overall much more effectively than previously proposed defenses. They also mitigate white-box membership inference attacks in FL, and our work is the first to show how effectively; neither, however, provides viable defenses against property inference. Our work also provides a re-usable measurement framework to quantify the trade-offs between robustness/privacy and utility in differentially private FL.
A major impediment to research on improving peer review is the unavailability of peer-review data, since any release of such data must grapple with the sensitivity of the peer review data in terms of protecting identities of reviewers from authors. We posit the need to develop techniques to release peer-review data in a privacy-preserving manner. Identifying this problem, in this paper we propose a framework for privacy-preserving release of certain conference peer-review data -- distributions of ratings, miscalibration, and subjectivity -- with an emphasis on the accuracy (or utility) of the released data. The crux of the framework lies in recognizing that a part of the data pertaining to the reviews is already available in public, and we use this information to post-process the data released by any privacy mechanism in a manner that improves the accuracy (utility) of the data while retaining the privacy guarantees. Our framework works with any privacy-preserving mechanism that operates via releasing perturbed data. We present several positive and negative theoretical results, including a polynomial-time algorithm for improving on the privacy-utility tradeoff.
Privacy and transparency are two key foundations of trustworthy machine learning. Model explanations offer insights into a models decisions on input data, whereas privacy is primarily concerned with protecting information about the training data. We analyze connections between model explanations and the leakage of sensitive information about the models training set. We investigate the privacy risks of feature-based model explanations using membership inference attacks: quantifying how much model predictions plus their explanations leak information about the presence of a datapoint in the training set of a model. We extensively evaluate membership inference attacks based on feature-based model explanations, over a variety of datasets. We show that backpropagation-based explanations can leak a significant amount of information about individual training datapoints. This is because they reveal statistical information about the decision boundaries of the model about an input, which can reveal its membership. We also empirically investigate the trade-off between privacy and explanation quality, by studying the perturbation-based model explanations.
Collecting and analyzing massive data generated from smart devices have become increasingly pervasive in crowdsensing, which are the building blocks for data-driven decision-making. However, extensive statistics and analysis of such data will seriously threaten the privacy of participating users. Local differential privacy (LDP) has been proposed as an excellent and prevalent privacy model with distributed architecture, which can provide strong privacy guarantees for each user while collecting and analyzing data. LDP ensures that each users data is locally perturbed first in the client-side and then sent to the server-side, thereby protecting data from privacy leaks on both the client-side and server-side. This survey presents a comprehensive and systematic overview of LDP with respect to privacy models, research tasks, enabling mechanisms, and various applications. Specifically, we first provide a theoretical summarization of LDP, including the LDP model, the variants of LDP, and the basic framework of LDP algorithms. Then, we investigate and compare the diverse LDP mechanisms for various data statistics and analysis tasks from the perspectives of frequency estimation, mean estimation, and machine learning. Whats more, we also summarize practical LDP-based application scenarios. Finally, we outline several future research directions under LDP.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
