Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userThe Formation of Jupiters Diluted Core by a Giant Impact
111
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
The Juno mission has provided an accurate determination of Jupiters gravitational field, which has been used to obtain information about the planets composition and internal structure. Several models of Jupiters structure that fit the probes data suggest that the planet has a diluted core, with a total heavy-element mass ranging from ten to a few tens of Earth masses (~5-15 % of the Jovian mass), and that heavy elements (elements other than H and He) are distributed within a region extending to nearly half of Jupiters radius. Planet-formation models indicate that most heavy elements are accreted during the early stages of a planets formation to create a relatively compact core and that almost no solids are accreted during subsequent runaway gas accretion. Jupiters diluted core, combined with its possible high heavy-element enrichment, thus challenges standard planet-formation theory. A possible explanation is erosion of the initially compact heavy-element core, but the efficiency of such erosion is uncertain and depends on both the immiscibility of heavy materials in metallic hydrogen and on convective mixing as the planet evolves. Another mechanism that can explain this structure is planetesimal enrichment and vaporization during the formation process, although relevant models typically cannot produce an extended diluted core. Here we show that a sufficiently energetic head-on collision (giant impact) between a large planetary embryo and the proto-Jupiter could have shattered its primordial compact core and mixed the heavy elements with the inner envelope. Models of such a scenario lead to an internal structure that is consistent with a diluted core, persisting over billions of years. We suggest that collisions were common in the young Solar system and that a similar event may have also occurred for Saturn, contributing to the structural differences between Jupiter and Saturn.
rate research
Read More
The giant impact phase of terrestrial planet formation establishes connections between super-Earths orbital properties (semimajor axis spacings, eccentricities, mutual inclinations) and interior compositions (the presence or absence of gaseous envelopes). Using N-body simulations and analytic arguments, we show that spacings derive not only from eccentricities, but also from inclinations. Flatter systems attain tighter spacings, a consequence of an eccentricity equilibrium between gravitational scatterings, which increase eccentricities, and mergers, which damp them. Dynamical friction by residual disk gas plays a critical role in regulating mergers and in damping inclinations and eccentricities. Systems with moderate gas damping and high solid surface density spawn gas-enveloped super-Earths with tight spacings, small eccentricities, and small inclinations. Systems in which super-Earths coagulate without as much ambient gas, in disks with low solid surface density, produce rocky planets with wider spacings, larger eccentricities, and larger mutual inclinations. A combination of both populations can reproduce the observed distributions of spacings, period ratios, transiting planet multiplicities, and transit duration ratios exhibited by Kepler super-Earths. The two populations, both formed in situ, also help to explain observed trends of eccentricity vs. planet size, and bulk density vs. method of mass measurement (radial velocities vs. transit timing variations). Simplifications made in this study --- including the limited timespan of the simulations, and the approximate treatments of gas dynamical friction and gas depletion history --- should be improved upon in future work to enable a detailed quantitative comparison to the observations.
Forming gas giant planets by the accretion of 100 km diameter planetesimals, a typical size that results from self-gravity assisted planetesimal formation, is often thought to be inefficient. Many models therefore use small km-sized planetesimals, or invoke the accretion of pebbles. Furthermore, models based on planetesimal accretion often use the ad hoc assumption of planetesimals distributed radially in a minimum mass solar nebula fashion. We wish to investigate the impact of various initial radial density distributions in planetesimals with a dynamical model for the formation of planetesimals on the resulting population of planets. In doing so, we highlight the directive role of the early stages of dust evolution into pebbles and planetesimals in the circumstellar disk on the following planetary formation. We have implemented a two population model for solid evolution and a pebble flux regulated model for planetesimal formation into our global model for planet population synthesis. This framework is used to study the global effect of planetesimal formation on planet formation. As reference, we compare our dynamically formed planetesimal surface densities with ad-hoc set distributions of different radial density slopes of planetesimals. Even though required, it is not solely the total planetesimal disk mass, but the planetesimal surface density slope and subsequently the formation mechanism of planetesimals, that enables planetary growth via planetesimal accretion. Highly condensed regions of only 100 km sized planetesimals in the inner regions of circumstellar disks can lead to gas giant growth. Pebble flux regulated planetesimal formation strongly boosts planet formation, because it is a highly effective mechanism to create a steep planetesimal density profile. We find this to lead to the formation of giant planets inside 1 au by 100 km already by pure planetesimal accretion.
The Earths core formation process has decisive effect in the chemical differentiation between the Earths core and its mantle. Here, we propose a new core formation model which is caused by a special giant impact. This model suggests that the impactors core can be kept intact by its own sticky mantle under appropriate impacting conditions and let it merge into the targets core without contact with the targets mantle. We call this special giant impact that caused the new core formation mode as glue ball impact model (GBI). By simulating hundreds of giant impacts with the sizes from planetesimals to planets, the conditions that can lead to GBI have been found out. If with small impact angle (i.e., less than 20 degree), small impact velocity and small impactors mass but larger than 0.07 Mearth, there is a good chance to produce a GBI at the final stage of the Earths accretion. We find that it will be much easier to have GBIs at the late stage of the Earths accretion rather than at the early stage of it. The GBI model will pose a great challenge to many problems between the equilibrium of Earths core and mantle. It provides an additional source for the excess of highly siderophile elements in the Earths mantle and also brings excessive lithophile elements to the Earths core. The GBI model may shed light on the study of Moon-formation and chemical differentiations of the pro-Earth.
In this Thesis I studied the formation of the four giant planets of the Solar System in the framework of the nucleated instability hypothesis. The model considers that solids and gas accretion are coupled in an interactive fashion, taking into account detailed constitutive physics for the envelope. The accretion rate of the core corresponds to the oligarchic growth regime. I also considered that accreted planetesimals follow a size distribution. One of the main results of this Thesis is that I was able to compute the formation of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune in less than 10 million years, which is considered to be the protoplanetary disk mean lifetime.
We study feedback during massive star formation using semi-analytic methods, considering the effects of disk winds, radiation pressure, photoevaporation and stellar winds, while following protostellar evolution in collapsing massive gas cores. We find that disk winds are the dominant feedback mechanism setting star formation efficiencies (SFEs) from initial cores of ~0.3-0.5. However, radiation pressure is also significant to widen the outflow cavity causing reductions of SFE compared to the disk-wind only case, especially for >100Msun star formation at clump mass surface densities Sigma<0.3g/cm2. Photoevaporation is of relatively minor importance due to dust attenuation of ionizing photons. Stellar winds have even smaller effects during the accretion stage. For core masses Mc~10-1000Msun and Sigma~0.1-3g/cm2, we find the overall SFE to be 0.31(Rc/0.1pc)^{-0.39}, potentially a useful sub-grid star-formation model in simulations that can resolve pre-stellar core radii, Rc=0.057(Mc/60Msun)^{1/2}(Sigma/g/cm2)^{-1/2}pc. The decline of SFE with Mc is gradual with no evidence for a maximum stellar-mass set by feedback processes up to stellar masses of ~300Msun. We thus conclude that the observed truncation of the high-mass end of the IMF is shaped mostly by the pre-stellar core mass function or internal stellar processes. To form massive stars with the observed maximum masses of ~150-300Msun, initial core masses need to be >500-1000Msun. We also apply our feedback model to zero-metallicity primordial star formation, showing that, in the absence of dust, photoevaporation staunches accretion at ~50Msun. Our model implies radiative feedback is most significant at metallicities ~10^{-2}Zsun, since both radiation pressure and photoevaporation are effective in this regime.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
