Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userConductors and minimal discriminants of hyperelliptic curves: A comparison in the tame case
170
0
0.0
(
0
)
Authors
Padmavathi Srinivasan
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Let $C$ be a hyperelliptic curve of genus $g$ over the fraction field $K$ of a discrete valuation ring $R$. Assume that the residue field $k$ of $R$ is perfect and that $mathrm{char} k > 2g+1$. Let $S = mathrm{Spec} R$. Let $X$ be the minimal proper regular model of $C$ over $S$. Let $mathrm{Art} (C/K)$ denote the Artin conductor of the $S$-scheme $X$ and let $ u (Delta_C)$ denote the minimal discriminant of $C$. We prove that $-mathrm{Art} (C/K) leq u (Delta_C)$. The key ingredients are a combinatorial refinement of the discriminant introduced in this paper (called the metric tree) and a recent refinement of Abhyankars inversion formula for studying plane curve singularities. We also prove combinatorial restrictions for $-mathrm{Art} (C/K) = u (Delta_C)$.
rate research
Read More
Let $C$ be a hyperelliptic curve of genus $g$ over the fraction field $K$ of a discrete valuation ring $R$. Assume that the residue field $k$ of $R$ is perfect and that $mathop{textrm{char}} k eq 2$. Assume that the Weierstrass points of $C$ are $K$-rational. Let $S = mathop{textrm{Spec}} R$. Let $mathcal{X}$ be the minimal proper regular model of $C$ over $S$. Let $mathop{textrm{Art}} (mathcal{X}/S)$ denote the Artin conductor of the $S$-scheme $mathcal{X}$ and let $ u (Delta)$ denote the minimal discriminant of $C$. We prove that $-mathop{textrm{Art}} (mathcal{X}/S) leq u (Delta)$. As a corollary, we obtain that the number of components of the special fiber of $mathcal{X}$ is bounded above by $ u(Delta)+1$.
We compute the Galois groups for a certain class of polynomials over the the field of rational numbers that was introduced by S. Mori and study the monodromy of corresponding hyperelliptic jacobians.
Let $K$ be an algebraically closed field of characteristic different from 2, $g$ a positive integer, $f(x)$ a degree $(2g+1)$ polynomial with coefficients in $K$ and without multiple roots, $C:y^2=f(x)$ the corresponding genus $g$ hyperelliptic curve over K, and $J$ the jacobian of $C$. We identify $C$ with the image of its canonical embedding into $J$ (the infinite point of $C$ goes to the identity element of $J$). It is well known that for each $mathfrak{b} in J(K)$ there are exactly $2^{2g}$ elements $mathfrak{a} in J(K)$ such that $2mathfrak{a}=mathfrak{b}$. M. Stoll constructed an algorithm that provides Mumford representations of all such $mathfrak{a}$, in terms of the Mumford representation of $mathfrak{b}$. The aim of this paper is to give explicit formulas for Mumford representations of all such $mathfrak{a}$, when $mathfrak{b}in J(K)$ is given by $P=(a,b) in C(K)subset J(K)$ in terms of coordinates $a,b$. We also prove that if $g>1$ then $C(K)$ does not contain torsion points with order between $3$ and $2g$.
We provide a simple approach for the crystalline comparison of Ainf-cohomology, and reprove the comparison between crystalline and p-adic etale cohomology for formal schemes in the case of good reduction.
We prove that the jacobian of a hyperelliptic curve $y^2=(x-t)h(x)$ has no nontrivial endomorphisms over an algebraic closure of the ground field $K$ of characteristic zero if $t in K$ and the Galois group of the polynomial $h(x)$ over $K$ is very big and $deg(h)$ is an even number >8. (The case of odd $deg(h)>3$ follows easily from previous results of the author.)
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
