Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userGiant planet and brown dwarf formation
174
0
0.0
(
0
)
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Understanding the dominant brown dwarf and giant planet formation processes, and finding out whether these processes rely on completely different mechanisms or share common channels represents one of the major challenges of astronomy and remains the subject of heated debates. It is the aim of this review to summarize the latest developments in this field and to address the issue of origin by confronting different brown dwarf and giant planet formation scenarios to presently available observational constraints. As examined in the review, if objects are classified as Brown Dwarfs or Giant Planets on the basis of their formation mechanism, it has now become clear that their mass domains overlap and that there is no mass limit between these two distinct populations. Furthermore, while there is increasing observational evidence for the existence of non-deuterium burning brown dwarfs, some giant planets, characterized by a significantly metal enriched composition, might be massive enough to ignite deuterium burning in their core. Deuterium burning (or lack of) thus plays no role in either brown dwarf or giant planet formation. Consequently, we argue that the IAU definition to distinguish these two populations has no physical justification and brings scientific confusion. In contrast, brown dwarfs and giant planets might bear some imprints of their formation mechanism, notably in their mean density and in the physical properties of their atmosphere. Future direct imaging surveys will undoubtedly provide crucial information and perhaps provide some clear observational diagnostics to unambiguously distinguish these different astrophysical objects.
rate research
Read More
We present the analysis of the gravitational microlensing event OGLE-2013-BLG-0102. The light curve of the event is characterized by a strong short-term anomaly superposed on a smoothly varying lensing curve with a moderate magnification $A_{rm max}sim 1.5$. It is found that the event was produced by a binary lens with a mass ratio between the components of $q = 0.13$ and the anomaly was caused by the passage of the source trajectory over a caustic located away from the barycenter of the binary. From the analysis of the effects on the light curve due to the finite size of the source and the parallactic motion of the Earth, the physical parameters of the lens system are determined. The measured masses of the lens components are $M_{1} = 0.096 pm 0.013~M_{odot}$ and $M_{2} = 0.012 pm 0.002~M_{odot}$, which correspond to near the hydrogen-burning and deuterium-burning mass limits, respectively. The distance to the lens is $3.04 pm 0.31~{rm kpc}$ and the projected separation between the lens components is $0.80 pm 0.08~{rm AU}$.
Most stars are born in clusters and the resulting gravitational interactions between cluster members may significantly affect the evolution of circumstellar discs and therefore the formation of planets and brown dwarfs. Recent findings suggest that tidal perturbations of typical circumstellar discs due to close encounters may inhibit rather than trigger disc fragmentation and so would seem to rule out planet formation by external tidal stimuli. However, the disc models in these calculations were restricted to disc radii of 40 AU and disc masses below 0.1 M_sun. Here we show that even modest encounters can trigger fragmentation around 100 AU in the sorts of massive (~0.5 M_sun), extended (>=100 AU) discs that are observed around young stars. Tidal perturbation alone can do this, no disc-disc collision is required. We also show that very-low-mass binary systems can form through the interaction of objects in the disc. In our computations, otherwise non-fragmenting massive discs, once perturbed, fragment into several objects between about 0.01 and 0.1 M_sun, i.e., over the whole brown dwarf mass range. Typically these orbit on highly eccentric orbits or are even ejected. While probably not suitable for the formation of Jupiter- or Neptune-type planets, our scenario provides a possible formation mechanism for brown dwarfs and very massive planets which, interestingly, leads to a mass distribution consistent with the canonical substellar IMF. As a minor outcome, a possible explanation for the origin of misaligned extrasolar planetary systems is discussed.
The formation of brown dwarfs (BDs) due to the fragmentation of proto-stellar disks undergoing pairwise encounters was investigated. High resolution allowed the use of realistic initial disk models where both the vertical structure and the local Jeans mass were resolved. The results show that objects with masses ranging from giant planets to low mass stars can form during such encounters from initially stable disks. The parameter space of initial spin-orbit orientations and the azimuthal angles for each disk was explored. An upper limit on the initial Toomre Q value of ~2 was found for fragmentation to occur. Depending on the initial configuration, shocks, tidal-tail structures and mass inflows were responsible for the condensation of disk gas. Retrograde disks were generally more likely to fragment. When the interaction timescale was significantly shorter than the disks dynamical timescales, the proto-stellar disks tended to be truncated without forming objects. The newly-formed objects had masses ranging from 0.9 to 127 Jupiter masses, with the majority in the BD regime. They often resided in star-BD multiples and in some cases also formed hierarchical orbiting systems. Most of them had large angular momenta and highly flattened, disk-like shapes. The objects had radii ranging from 0.1 to 10 AU. The disk gas was assumed to be locally isothermal, appropriate for the short cooling times in extended proto-stellar disks, but not for condensed objects. An additional case with explicit cooling that reduced to zero for optically thick gas was simulated to test the extremes of cooling effectiveness and it was still possible to form objects in this case. Detailed radiative transfer is expected to lengthen the internal evolution timescale for these objects, but not to alter our basic results.
We present L band (3.8 $mu m$) MMT/Clio high-contrast imaging data for the nearby star GJ 758, which was recently reported by Thalmann et al. (2009) to have one -- possibly two-- faint comoving companions (GJ 758B and ``C, respectively). GJ 758B is detected in two distinct datasets. Additionally, we report a textit{possible} detection of the object identified by Thalmann et al as ``GJ 758C in our more sensitive dataset, though it is likely a residual speckle. However, if it is the same object as that reported by Thalmann et al. it cannot be a companion in a bound orbit. GJ 758B has a H-L color redder than nearly all known L--T8 dwarfs. Based on comparisons with the COND evolutionary models, GJ 758B has T$_{e}$ $sim$ 560 K$^{^{+150 K}_{-90K}}$ and a mass ranging from $sim$ 10--20 M$_{J}$ if it is $sim$ 1 Gyr old to $sim$ 25--40 M$_{J}$ if it is 8.7 Gyr old. GJ 758B is likely in a highly eccentric orbit, e $sim$ 0.73$^{^{+0.12}_{-0.21}}$, with a semimajor axis of $sim$ 44 AU$^{^{+32 AU}_{-14 AU}}$. Though GJ 758B is sometimes discussed within the context of exoplanet direct imaging, its mass is likely greater than the deuterium-burning limit and its formation may resemble that of binary stars rather than that of jovian-mass planets.
We report the discovery, via the microlensing method, of a new very-low-mass binary system. By combining measurements from Earth and from the Spitzer telescope in Earth-trailing orbit, we are able to measure the microlensing parallax of the event, and find that the lens likely consists of an $(12.0 pm 0.6) M_{rm J}$ + $(15.7 pm 1.5) M_{rm J}$ super-Jupiter / brown-dwarf pair. The binary is located at a distance of $(3.08 pm 0.18)$ kpc in the Galactic Plane, and the components have a projected separation of $(0.43 pm 0.03)$ AU. Two alternative solutions with much lower likelihoods are also discussed, an 8- and 6-$M_{rm J}$ model and a 90- and 70-$M_{rm J}$ model. Although disfavored at the 3-$sigma$ and 5-$sigma$ levels, these alternatives cannot be rejected entirely. We show how the more-massive of these models could be tested with future direct imaging.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
