The subject of this research is a controversial subject between
researchers and practitioners in the field of arbitration. They argue
how to ensure the implementation of arbitral tribunals judgments,
how to make it at the same level of importance
as a judicial rulings
and how enrich it with the force of the inevitable matter. Law and
Finance and Economy specialist suffer from the previous obstacles
in spite of they know the use of arbitration as a preferred method to
solve the disputes. So we try in this research to highlight how to
protect the arbitral decision through improving the performance
reaching to a decision which couldn't be exposed to serious errors.
Thus research in the development of the existing legislation and the
international agreements trying to achieve the goal of giving the
arbitral decision power of self-force equivalent to force of the
inevitable matter. Which by the end, it will minimize the effort and
the time.
Our studies have included a comparison between the two terms
which included the title, relying on Syrian evidence Act, Syrian
arbitration Law and views of some scholars and jurists seeking to
create a satisfaction to implement a valiant steps in this area mindful
of the limits of national sovereignty and the rules of public order
which it is considered as constants.
