Law's general principles play a significant role which cannot be
denied in the field of the efficacy of judicial surveillance over
administrative resolutions issued on the administration's past. In this research we will illustrate its role in the f
ield of controlling
administrative resolution in terms of the cause factor which it is one of the components of internal legitimacy of resolution.
Undoubtedly the role of general principles is gaining greatness
in the case of the absence or shortcoming of texts, where the judge
tends to fill in the gaps by inventing public legal rules which
complement the legal construction and bridge the gaps, and figure
out the necessary solution for the dispute at land.
As for the factor or the motive for resolution issuance, the most
important legal principles set by administrative law are embodied in
the principle of the announcement of the reasons for the
administrative resolution and the principle requiring that every
administrative resolution has its cause which justifies in a truthful
manner, namely, in reality and in terms of the law.
The principles operate in the case where the legislator fails to
mention the event - events which emerge as cause - causes that
motivate the resolution taken, and where he fails to mention the
need for announcing it within the administrative resolution taken.
The resolution is regarded as legitimate in the case of their
existence either in the events or the legal teats, or illegitimate in the
case of their absence or efficacy. The illegitimacy is here manifested
in the as well law's general principles.