Technology companies have produced varied responses to concerns about the effects of the design of their conversational AI systems. Some have claimed that their voice assistants are in fact not gendered or human-like---despite design features suggest
ing the contrary. We compare these claims to user perceptions by analysing the pronouns they use when referring to AI assistants. We also examine systems' responses and the extent to which they generate output which is gendered and anthropomorphic. We find that, while some companies appear to be addressing the ethical concerns raised, in some cases, their claims do not seem to hold true. In particular, our results show that system outputs are ambiguous as to the humanness of the systems, and that users tend to personify and gender them as a result.
In the past few years, smart phones developments than just a simple mobile phones
to sophisticated computers. This development has allowed for users of smart phones to surf
the Internet, receive and send e-mail, SMS and MMS messages and connect to
devices to
exchange information. And make all these features of the smartphone useful tool in our
daily lives, but the same time, make it more useful to attract malicious applications.
Knowing that most users store sensitive information on their mobile phones .smart phones
are considered desirable scorer attackers and malware developers .And make the need to
preserve the security and confidentiality of the data on the Android platform from malware
analysis on it is an urgent issue.
This research on previous methods to analyze the dynamic behavior of the
applications have been approved and adopted a method to detect malware on the Android
platform. It was implication the reagent in the context of assembling the effects of the
number of users relied on crowdsourcing. We have been testing our frame analysis of the
collected data at the central server using two types of data sets: data from the artificial
malware have been created for testing purposes and malware incident of life in the world.
It turns out that the method used is an effective way to isolate malware and alert users to
software that was downloaded.
This Article addresses the interaction between digital technology and Intellectual Property Law. Despite its obvious benefits, the Internet was and still is a major source of legal obscurity. The one million dollar question is to what extent, if at a
ll, can the law of intellectual property strike the correct balance between innovation and the protection of Intellecual Property Rights? Keeping the concepts of digital liabraries, peer 2 peer systems and second life, answering the previous questions seems to be easirer said than done.
Keeping the above in mind, this Article highlights the legal argument in the United States of America, Canada and the UK. As such, it does focus, unexclusivily, on the Common Law System.
The conclusion we have reached is that any answer could be anticipated to deal with these technological issues from a legal point of view should not be taken as an excuse to hinder the development of business
