اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدA little goes a long way: Improving toxic language classification despite data scarcity
322
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Detection of some types of toxic language is hampered by extreme scarcity of labeled training data. Data augmentation - generating new synthetic data from a labeled seed dataset - can help. The efficacy of data augmentation on toxic language classification has not been fully explored. We present the first systematic study on how data augmentation techniques impact performance across toxic language classifiers, ranging from shallow logistic regression architectures to BERT - a state-of-the-art pre-trained Transformer network. We compare the performance of eight techniques on very scarce seed datasets. We show that while BERT performed the best, shallow classifiers performed comparably when trained on data augmented with a combination of three techniques, including GPT-2-generated sentences. We discuss the interplay of performance and computational overhead, which can inform the choice of techniques under different constraints.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
Neural dependency parsing has achieved remarkable performance for many domains and languages. The bottleneck of massive labeled data limits the effectiveness of these approaches for low resource languages. In this work, we focus on dependency parsing
for morphological rich languages (MRLs) in a low-resource setting. Although morphological information is essential for the dependency parsing task, the morphological disambiguation and lack of powerful analyzers pose challenges to get this information for MRLs. To address these challenges, we propose simple auxiliary tasks for pretraining. We perform experiments on 10 MRLs in low-resource settings to measure the efficacy of our proposed pretraining method and observe an average absolute gain of 2 points (UAS) and 3.6 points (LAS). Code and data available at: https://github.com/jivnesh/LCM
Spiking neural networks (SNNs) offer an inherent ability to process spatial-temporal data, or in other words, realworld sensory data, but suffer from the difficulty of training high accuracy models. A major thread of research on SNNs is on converting
a pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) to an SNN of the same structure. State-of-the-art conversion methods are approaching the accuracy limit, i.e., the near-zero accuracy loss of SNN against the original CNN. However, we note that this is made possible only when significantly more energy is consumed to process an input. In this paper, we argue that this trend of energy for accuracy is not necessary -- a little energy can go a long way to achieve the near-zero accuracy loss. Specifically, we propose a novel CNN-to-SNN conversion method that is able to use a reasonably short spike train (e.g., 256 timesteps for CIFAR10 images) to achieve the near-zero accuracy loss. The new conversion method, named as explicit current control (ECC), contains three techniques (current normalisation, thresholding for residual elimination, and consistency maintenance for batch-normalisation), in order to explicitly control the currents flowing through the SNN when processing inputs. We implement ECC into a tool nicknamed SpKeras, which can conveniently import Keras CNN models and convert them into SNNs. We conduct an extensive set of experiments with the tool -- working with VGG16 and various datasets such as CIFAR10 and CIFAR100 -- and compare with state-of-the-art conversion methods. Results show that ECC is a promising method that can optimise over energy consumption and accuracy loss simultaneously.
We study the performance-fairness trade-off in more than a dozen fine-tuned LMs for toxic text classification. We empirically show that no blanket statement can be made with respect to the bias of large versus regular versus compressed models. Moreov
er, we find that focusing on fairness-agnostic performance metrics can lead to models with varied fairness characteristics.
Despite the recent successes of transformer-based models in terms of effectiveness on a variety of tasks, their decisions often remain opaque to humans. Explanations are particularly important for tasks like offensive language or toxicity detection o
n social media because a manual appeal process is often in place to dispute automatically flagged content. In this work, we propose a technique to improve the interpretability of these models, based on a simple and powerful assumption: a post is at least as toxic as its most toxic span. We incorporate this assumption into transformer models by scoring a post based on the maximum toxicity of its spans and augmenting the training process to identify correct spans. We find this approach effective and can produce explanations that exceed the quality of those provided by Logistic Regression analysis (often regarded as a highly-interpretable model), according to a human study.
Automatic detection of toxic language plays an essential role in protecting social media users, especially minority groups, from verbal abuse. However, biases toward some attributes, including gender, race, and dialect, exist in most training dataset
s for toxicity detection. The biases make the learned models unfair and can even exacerbate the marginalization of people. Considering that current debiasing methods for general natural language understanding tasks cannot effectively mitigate the biases in the toxicity detectors, we propose to use invariant rationalization (InvRat), a game-theoretic framework consisting of a rationale generator and a predictor, to rule out the spurious correlation of certain syntactic patterns (e.g., identity mentions, dialect) to toxicity labels. We empirically show that our method yields lower false positive rate in both lexical and dialectal attributes than previous debiasing methods.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
