اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدInferring a difference in the star-forming properties of lower versus higher X-ray luminosity AGNs
35
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
We explore the distribution of RMS=SFR/SFR_MS (where SFR_MS is the star formation rate of Main Sequence star-forming galaxies) for AGN hosts at z=1. We split our sample into two bins of X-ray luminosity divided at Lx=2x10^43erg s-1 to investigate whether the RMS distribution changes as a function of AGN power. Our main results suggest that, when the RMS distribution of AGN hosts is modelled as a log-normal distribution (i.e. the same shape as that of MS galaxies), galaxies hosting more powerful X-ray AGNs (i.e. Lx>2x10^43erg s-1) display a narrower RMS distribution that is shifted to higher values compared to their lower Lx counterparts. In addition, we find that more powerful X-ray AGNs have SFRs that are more consistent with that of MS galaxies compared to lower Lx AGNs. Despite this, the mean SFRs (as opposed to RMS) measured from these distributions are consistent with the previously observed flat relationship between SFR and Lx. Our results suggest that the typical star-forming properties of AGN hosts change with Lx , and that more powerful AGNs typically reside in more MS-like star-forming galaxies compared to lower Lx AGNs.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
We investigate the X-ray variability characteristics of hard X-ray selected AGNs (based on Swift/BAT data) in the soft X-ray band using the RXTE/ASM data. The uncertainties involved in the individual dwell measurements of ASM are critically examined
and a method is developed to combine a large number of dwells with appropriate error propagation to derive long duration flux measurements (greater than 10 days). We also provide a general prescription to estimate the errors in variability derived from rms values from unequally spaced data. Though the derived variability for individual sources are not of very high significance, we find that, in general, the soft X-ray variability is higher than those in hard X-rays and the variability strengths decrease with energy for the diverse classes of AGN. We also examine the strength of variability as a function of the break time scale in the power density spectrum (derived from the estimated mass and bolometric luminosity of the sources) and find that the data are consistent with the idea of higher variability at time scales longer than the break time scale.
An enigmatic, small class of IR and X-ray luminous sources, named ``Composite starburst/Seyfert galaxies, has been defined from IRAS and RASS data. The objects have optical spectra dominated by the features of HII galaxies (plus, in some cases, weak
Seyfert signatures) but X-ray luminosities higher than expected from starbursts and more typical of Seyfert nuclei. The true nature of this class of objects is still unknown. We present Chandra data of four of these galaxies that were obtained to investigate the nature of the X-ray source. The X-ray spectrum, the lack of any significant extended component, and the observed variability indicate that the AGN is the dominant component in the X-ray domain.
We study the diffuse X-ray luminosity ($L_X$) of star forming galaxies using 2-D axisymmetric hydrodynamical simulations and analytical considerations of supernovae (SNe) driven galactic outflows. We find that the mass loading of the outflows, a cruc
ial parameter for determining the X-ray luminosity, is constrained by the availability of gas in the central star forming region, and a competition between cooling and expansion. We show that the allowed range of the mass loading factor can explain the observed scaling of $L_X$ with star formation rate (SFR) as $L_X propto$ SFR$^2$ for SFR $gtrsim 1$ M$_odot$yr$^{-1}$, and a flatter relation at low SFRs. We also show that the emission from the hot circumgalactic medium (CGM) in the halo of massive galaxies can explain the sub-linear behaviour of the $L_X-$SFR relation as well as a large scatter in the diffuse X-ray emission for low SFRs ($lesssim$ few M$_odot$yr$^{-1}$). Our results point out that galaxies with small SFRs and large diffuse X-ray luminosities are excellent candidates for detection of the elusive CGM.
X-ray surveys contain sizable numbers of star forming galaxies, beyond the AGN which usually make the majority of detections. Many methods to separate the two populations are used in the literature, based on X-ray and multiwavelength properties. We a
im at a detailed test of the classification schemes and to study the X-ray properties of the resulting samples. We build on a sample of galaxies selected at 1.4 GHz in the VLA-COSMOS survey, classified by Smolcic et al. (2008) according to their optical colours and observed with Chandra. A similarly selected control sample of AGN is also used for comparison. We review some X-ray based classification criteria and check how they affect the sample composition. The efficiency of the classification scheme devised by Smolcic et al. (2008) is such that ~30% of composite/misclassified objects are expected because of the higher X-ray brightness of AGN with respect to galaxies. The latter fraction is actually 50% in the X-ray detected sources, while it is expected to be much lower among X-ray undetected sources. Indeed, the analysis of the stacked spectrum of undetected sources shows, consistently, strongly different properties between the AGN and galaxy samples. X-ray based selection criteria are then used to refine both samples. The radio/X-ray luminosity correlation for star forming galaxies is found to hold with the same X-ray/radio ratio valid for nearby galaxies. Some evolution of the ratio may be possible for sources at high redshift or high luminosity, tough it is likely explained by a bias arising from the radio selection. Finally, we discuss the X-ray number counts of star forming galaxies from the VLA- and C-COSMOS surveys according to different selection criteria, and compare them to the similar determination from the Chandra Deep Fields. The classification scheme proposed here may find application in future works and surveys.
We compare the optical spectral types with the X-ray spectral properties for a uniformly selected (sources with fluxes greater than the 3 sigma level and above a flux limit of f_2-8 keV > 3.5x10^-15 erg/cm2/s), highly spectroscopically complete (>80%
for f_2-8 keV > 10^-14 erg/cm2/s and >60% below) 2-8 keV X-ray sample observed in three Chandra fields (CLANS, CLASXS, and the CDF-N) that cover ~1.2 deg^2. For our sample of 645 spectroscopically observed sources, we confirm that there is significant overlap of the X-ray spectral properties, as determined by the effective photon indices, Geff, obtained from the ratios of the 0.5-2 keV to 2-8 keV counts, for the different optical spectral types. For example, of the broad-line AGNs (non-broad-line AGNs), 20% +/- 3% (33% +/- 4%) have Geff<1.2 (Geff > 1.2). Thus, one cannot use the X-ray spectral classifications and the optical spectral classifications equivalently. Since it is not understood how X-ray and optical classifications relate to the obscuration of the central engine, we strongly advise against a mixed classification scheme, as it can only complicate the interpretation of X-ray AGN samples. We confirm the dependence of optical spectral type on X-ray luminosity, and for z<1, we find a similar luminosity dependence of Geff. However, this dependence breaks down at higher redshifts due to the highly redshift-dependent nature of Geff. We therefore also caution that any classification scheme which depends on Geff is likely to suffer from serious redshift bias.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
