اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدAchieving Zero Constraint Violation for Constrained Reinforcement Learning via Primal-Dual Approach
79
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Reinforcement learning is widely used in applications where one needs to perform sequential decisions while interacting with the environment. The problem becomes more challenging when the decision requirement includes satisfying some safety constraints. The problem is mathematically formulated as constrained Markov decision process (CMDP). In the literature, various algorithms are available to solve CMDP problems in a model-free manner to achieve $epsilon$-optimal cumulative reward with $epsilon$ feasible policies. An $epsilon$-feasible policy implies that it suffers from constraint violation. An important question here is whether we can achieve $epsilon$-optimal cumulative reward with zero constraint violations or not. To achieve that, we advocate the use of a randomized primal-dual approach to solving the CMDP problems and propose a conservative stochastic primal-dual algorithm (CSPDA) which is shown to exhibit $tilde{mathcal{O}}(1/epsilon^2)$ sample complexity to achieve $epsilon$-optimal cumulative reward with zero constraint violations. In the prior works, the best available sample complexity for the $epsilon$-optimal policy with zero constraint violation is $tilde{mathcal{O}}(1/epsilon^5)$. Hence, the proposed algorithm provides a significant improvement as compared to the state of the art.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
We address the issue of safety in reinforcement learning. We pose the problem in an episodic framework of a constrained Markov decision process. Existing results have shown that it is possible to achieve a reward regret of $tilde{mathcal{O}}(sqrt{K})
$ while allowing an $tilde{mathcal{O}}(sqrt{K})$ constraint violation in $K$ episodes. A critical question that arises is whether it is possible to keep the constraint violation even smaller. We show that when a strictly safe policy is known, then one can confine the system to zero constraint violation with arbitrarily high probability while keeping the reward regret of order $tilde{mathcal{O}}(sqrt{K})$. The algorithm which does so employs the principle of optimistic pessimism in the face of uncertainty to achieve safe exploration. When no strictly safe policy is known, though one is known to exist, then it is possible to restrict the system to bounded constraint violation with arbitrarily high probability. This is shown to be realized by a primal-dual algorithm with an optimistic primal estimate and a pessimistic dual update.
In this paper, we study the learning of safe policies in the setting of reinforcement learning problems. This is, we aim to control a Markov Decision Process (MDP) of which we do not know the transition probabilities, but we have access to sample tra
jectories through experience. We define safety as the agent remaining in a desired safe set with high probability during the operation time. We therefore consider a constrained MDP where the constraints are probabilistic. Since there is no straightforward way to optimize the policy with respect to the probabilistic constraint in a reinforcement learning framework, we propose an ergodic relaxation of the problem. The advantages of the proposed relaxation are threefold. (i) The safety guarantees are maintained in the case of episodic tasks and they are kept up to a given time horizon for continuing tasks. (ii) The constrained optimization problem despite its non-convexity has arbitrarily small duality gap if the parametrization of the policy is rich enough. (iii) The gradients of the Lagrangian associated with the safe-learning problem can be easily computed using standard policy gradient results and stochastic approximation tools. Leveraging these advantages, we establish that primal-dual algorithms are able to find policies that are safe and optimal. We test the proposed approach in a navigation task in a continuous domain. The numerical results show that our algorithm is capable of dynamically adapting the policy to the environment and the required safety levels.
We consider the problem of tabular infinite horizon concave utility reinforcement learning (CURL) with convex constraints. Various learning applications with constraints, such as robotics, do not allow for policies that can violate constraints. To th
is end, we propose a model-based learning algorithm that achieves zero constraint violations. To obtain this result, we assume that the concave objective and the convex constraints have a solution interior to the set of feasible occupation measures. We then solve a tighter optimization problem to ensure that the constraints are never violated despite the imprecise model knowledge and model stochasticity. We also propose a novel Bellman error based analysis for tabular infinite-horizon setups which allows to analyse stochastic policies. Combining the Bellman error based analysis and tighter optimization equation, for $T$ interactions with the environment, we obtain a regret guarantee for objective which grows as $Tilde{O}(1/sqrt{T})$, excluding other factors.
We develop a parameterized Primal-Dual $pi$ Learning method based on deep neural networks for Markov decision process with large state space and off-policy reinforcement learning. In contrast to the popular Q-learning and actor-critic methods that ar
e based on successive approximations to the nonlinear Bellman equation, our method makes primal-dual updates to the policy and value functions utilizing the fundamental linear Bellman duality. Naive parametrization of the primal-dual $pi$ learning method using deep neural networks would encounter two major challenges: (1) each update requires computing a probability distribution over the state space and is intractable; (2) the iterates are unstable since the parameterized Lagrangian function is no longer linear. We address these challenges by proposing a relaxed Lagrangian formulation with a regularization penalty using the advantage function. We show that the dual policy update step in our method is equivalent to the policy gradient update in the actor-critic method in some special case, while the value updates differ substantially. The main advantage of the primal-dual $pi$ learning method lies in that the value and policy updates are closely coupled together using the Bellman duality and therefore more informative. Experiments on a simple cart-pole problem show that the algorithm significantly outperforms the one-step temporal-difference actor-critic method, which is the most relevant benchmark method to compare with. We believe that the primal-dual updates to the value and policy functions would expedite the learning process. The proposed methods might open a door to more efficient algorithms and sharper theoretical analysis.
Action-constrained reinforcement learning (RL) is a widely-used approach in various real-world applications, such as scheduling in networked systems with resource constraints and control of a robot with kinematic constraints. While the existing proje
ction-based approaches ensure zero constraint violation, they could suffer from the zero-gradient problem due to the tight coupling of the policy gradient and the projection, which results in sample-inefficient training and slow convergence. To tackle this issue, we propose a learning algorithm that decouples the action constraints from the policy parameter update by leveraging state-wise Frank-Wolfe and a regression-based policy update scheme. Moreover, we show that the proposed algorithm enjoys convergence and policy improvement properties in the tabular case as well as generalizes the popular DDPG algorithm for action-constrained RL in the general case. Through experiments, we demonstrate that the proposed algorithm significantly outperforms the benchmark methods on a variety of control tasks.
الأسئلة المقترحة
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
