اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدImpact of plasma shaping on tokamak microstability
191
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
We have used the local-$delta{f}$ gyrokinetic code GS2 to perform studies of the effect of flux-surface shaping on two highly-shaped, low- and high-$beta$ JT-60SA-relevant equilibria, including a successful benchmark with the GKV code. We find a novel destabilization of electrostatic fluctuations with increased elongation for plasma with a strongly peaked pressure profile. We explain the results as a competition between the local magnetic shear and finite-Larmor-radius (FLR) stabilization. Electromagnetic studies indicate that kinetic ballooning modes are stabilized by increased shaping due to an increased sensitivity to FLR effects, relative to the ion-temperature-gradient instability. Nevertheless, at high enough $beta$, increased elongation degrades the local magnetic shear stabilization that enables access to the region of ballooning second-stability.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
Neutral beam injection or ion cyclotron resonance heating induces pressure anisotropy. The axisymmetric plasma equilibrium code HELENA has been upgraded to include anisotropy and toroidal flow. With both analytical and numerical methods, we have stud
ied the determinant factors in anisotropic equilibria and their impact on flux surfaces, magnetic axis shift, the displacement of pressures and density contours from flux surface. With $p_parallel/p_perp approx 1.5$, $p_perp$ can vary 20% on $s=0.5$ flux surface, in a MAST like equilibrium. We have also re-evaluated the widely applied approximation to anisotropy in which $p^*=(p_parallel + p_perp)/2$, the average of parallel and perpendicular pressure, is taken as the approximate isotropic pressure. We find the reconstructions of the same MAST discharge with $p_parallel/p_perp approx 1.25$, using isotropic and anisotropic model respectively, to have a 3% difference in toroidal field but a 66% difference in poloidal current.
The Hall term has often been neglected in MHD codes as it is difficult to compute. Nevertheless setting it aside for numerical reasons led to ignoring it altogether. This is especially problematic when dealing with tokamak physics as the Hall term cannot be neglected as this paper shows.
For a two week period during the Joint European Torus (JET) 2012 experimental campaign, the same high confinement plasma was repeated 151 times. The dataset was analysed to produce a probability density function (pdf) for the waiting times between ed
ge-localised plasma instabilities (ELMS). The result was entirely unexpected. Instead of a smooth single peaked pdf, a succession of 4-5 sharp maxima and minima uniformly separated by 7-8 millisecond intervals was found. Here we explore the causes of this newly observed phenomenon, and conclude that it is either due to a self-organised plasma phenomenon or an interaction between the plasma and a real-time control system. If the maxima are a result of resonant frequencies at which ELMs can be triggered more easily, then future ELM control techniques can, and probably will, use them. Either way, these results demand a deeper understanding of the ELMing process.
Magnetic islands (MIs), resulting from a magnetic field reconnection, are ubiquitous structures in magnetized plasmas. In tokamak plasmas, recent researches suggested that the interaction between the MI and ambient turbulence can be important for the
nonlinear MI evolution, but a lack of detailed experimental observations and analyses has prevented further understanding. Here, we provide comprehensive two-dimensional observations that indicate various effects of the ambient turbulence on the nonlinear MI evolution. It is shown that the modified plasma turbulence around the MI can lead to either destabilization or stabilization of the MI instability in tokamak plasmas. In particular, significantly enhanced turbulence at the X-point of the MI results in a violent disruption through the fast magnetic reconnection and magnetic field stochastization.
Turbulence is a major factor limiting the achievement of better tokamak performance as it enhances the transport of particles, momentum and heat which hinders the foremost objective of tokamaks. Hence, understanding and possibly being able to control
turbulence in tokamaks is of paramount importance, not to mention our intellectual curiosity of it.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
