اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدConfounding Feature Acquisition for Causal Effect Estimation
89
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Reliable treatment effect estimation from observational data depends on the availability of all confounding information. While much work has targeted treatment effect estimation from observational data, there is relatively little work in the setting of confounding variable missingness, where collecting more information on confounders is often costly or time-consuming. In this work, we frame this challenge as a problem of feature acquisition of confounding features for causal inference. Our goal is to prioritize acquiring values for a fixed and known subset of missing confounders in samples that lead to efficient average treatment effect estimation. We propose two acquisition strategies based on i) covariate balancing (CB), and ii) reducing statistical estimation error on observed factual outcome error (OE). We compare CB and OE on five common causal effect estimation methods, and demonstrate improved sample efficiency of OE over baseline methods under various settings. We also provide visualizations for further analysis on the difference between our proposed methods.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
The problem of inferring the direct causal parents of a response variable among a large set of explanatory variables is of high practical importance in many disciplines. Recent work in the field of causal discovery exploits invariance properties of m
odels across different experimental conditions for detecting direct causal links. However, these approaches generally do not scale well with the number of explanatory variables, are difficult to extend to nonlinear relationships, and require data across different experiments. Inspired by {em Debiased} machine learning methods, we study a one-vs.-the-rest feature selection approach to discover the direct causal parent of the response. We propose an algorithm that works for purely observational data, while also offering theoretical guarantees, including the case of partially nonlinear relationships. Requiring only one estimation for each variable, we can apply our approach even to large graphs, demonstrating significant improvements compared to established approaches.
Most existing studies on the double/debiased machine learning method concentrate on the causal parameter estimation recovering from the first-order orthogonal score function. In this paper, we will construct the $k^{mathrm{th}}$-order orthogonal scor
e function for estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) and present an algorithm that enables us to obtain the debiased estimator recovered from the score function. Such a higher-order orthogonal estimator is more robust to the misspecification of the propensity score than the first-order one does. Besides, it has the merit of being applicable with many machine learning methodologies such as Lasso, Random Forests, Neural Nets, etc. We also undergo comprehensive experiments to test the power of the estimator we construct from the score function using both the simulated datasets and the real datasets.
We discuss promising recent contributions on quantifying feature relevance using Shapley values, where we observed some confusion on which probability distribution is the right one for dropped features. We argue that the confusion is based on not car
efully distinguishing between observational and interventional conditional probabilities and try a clarification based on Pearls seminal work on causality. We conclude that unconditional rather than conditional expectations provide the right notion of dropping features in contradiction to the theoretical justification of the software package SHAP. Parts of SHAP are unaffected because unconditional expectations (which we argue to be conceptually right) are used as approximation for the conditional ones, which encouraged others to `improve SHAP in a way that we believe to be flawed.
The ability to generalize from observed to new related environments is central to any form of reliable machine learning, yet most methods fail when moving beyond i.i.d data. This work argues that in some cases the reason lies in a misapreciation of t
he causal structure in data; and in particular due to the influence of unobserved confounders which void many of the invariances and principles of minimum error between environments presently used for the problem of domain generalization. This observation leads us to study generalization in the context of a broader class of interventions in an underlying causal model (including changes in observed, unobserved and target variable distributions) and to connect this causal intuition with an explicit distributionally robust optimization problem. From this analysis derives a new proposal for model learning with explicit generalization guarantees that is based on the partial equality of error derivatives with respect to model parameters. We demonstrate the empirical performance of our approach on healthcare data from different modalities, including image, speech and tabular data.
Algorithms are commonly used to predict outcomes under a particular decision or intervention, such as predicting whether an offender will succeed on parole if placed under minimal supervision. Generally, to learn such counterfactual prediction models
from observational data on historical decisions and corresponding outcomes, one must measure all factors that jointly affect the outcomes and the decision taken. Motivated by decision support applications, we study the counterfactual prediction task in the setting where all relevant factors are captured in the historical data, but it is either undesirable or impermissible to use some such factors in the prediction model. We refer to this setting as runtime confounding. We propose a doubly-robust procedure for learning counterfactual prediction models in this setting. Our theoretical analysis and experimental results suggest that our method often outperforms competing approaches. We also present a validation procedure for evaluating the performance of counterfactual prediction methods.
الأسئلة المقترحة
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
