اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدCausal Mediation Analysis with Multiple Treatments and Latent Confounders
73
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
Causal mediation analysis is used to evaluate direct and indirect causal effects of a treatment on an outcome of interest through an intermediate variable or a mediator.It is difficult to identify the direct and indirect causal effects because the mediator cannot be randomly assigned in many real applications. In this article, we consider a causal model including latent confounders between the mediator and the outcome. We present sufficient conditions for identifying the direct and indirect effects and propose an approach for estimating them. The performance of the proposed approach is evaluated by simulation studies. Finally, we apply the approach to a data set of the customer loyalty survey by a telecom company.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
An important problem in causal inference is to break down the total effect of treatment into different causal pathways and quantify the causal effect in each pathway. Causal mediation analysis (CMA) is a formal statistical approach for identifying an
d estimating these causal effects. Central to CMA is the sequential ignorability assumption that implies all pre-treatment confounders are measured and they can capture different types of confounding, e.g., post-treatment confounders and hidden confounders. Typically unverifiable in observational studies, this assumption restrains both the coverage and practicality of conventional methods. This work, therefore, aims to circumvent the stringent assumption by following a causal graph with a unified confounder and its proxy variables. Our core contribution is an algorithm that combines deep latent-variable models and proxy strategy to jointly infer a unified surrogate confounder and estimate different causal effects in CMA from observed variables. Empirical evaluations using both synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Interventional effects for mediation analysis were proposed as a solution to the lack of identifiability of natural (in)direct effects in the presence of a mediator-outcome confounder affected by exposure. We present a theoretical and computational s
tudy of the properties of the interventional (in)direct effect estimands based on the efficient influence fucntion (EIF) in the non-parametric statistical model. We use the EIF to develop two asymptotically optimal, non-parametric estimators that leverage data-adaptive regression for estimation of the nuisance parameters: a one-step estimator and a targeted minimum loss estimator. A free and open source texttt{R} package implementing our proposed estimators is made available on GitHub. We further present results establishing the conditions under which these estimators are consistent, multiply robust, $n^{1/2}$-consistent and efficient. We illustrate the finite-sample performance of the estimators and corroborate our theoretical results in a simulation study. We also demonstrate the use of the estimators in our motivating application to elucidate the mechanisms behind the unintended harmful effects that a housing intervention had on adolescent girls risk behavior.
I propose a framework, estimators, and inference procedures for the analysis of causal effects in a setting with spatial treatments. Many events and policies (treatments), such as opening of businesses, building of hospitals, and sources of pollution
, occur at specific spatial locations, with researchers interested in their effects on nearby individuals or businesses (outcome units). However, the existing treatment effects literature primarily considers treatments that could be assigned directly at the level of the outcome units, potentially with spillover effects. I approach the spatial treatment setting from a similar experimental perspective: What ideal experiment would we design to estimate the causal effects of spatial treatments? This perspective motivates a comparison between individuals near realized treatment locations and individuals near unrealized candidate locations, which is distinct from current empirical practice. Furthermore, I show how to find such candidate locations and apply the proposed methods with observational data. I apply the proposed methods to study the causal effects of grocery stores on foot traffic to nearby businesses during COVID-19 lockdowns.
Alzheimers disease is a progressive form of dementia that results in problems with memory, thinking and behavior. It often starts with abnormal aggregation and deposition of beta-amyloid and tau, followed by neuronal damage such as atrophy of the hip
pocampi, and finally leads to behavioral deficits. Despite significant progress in finding biomarkers associated with behavioral deficits, the underlying causal mechanism remains largely unknown. Here we investigate whether and how hippocampal atrophy contributes to behavioral deficits based on a large-scale observational study conducted by the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). As a key novelty, we use 2D representations of the hippocampi, which allows us to better understand atrophy associated with different subregions. It, however, introduces methodological challenges as existing causal inference methods are not well suited for exploiting structural information embedded in the 2D exposures. Moreover, our data contain more than 6 million clinical and genetic covariates, necessitating appropriate confounder selection methods. We hence develop a novel two-step causal inference approach tailored for our ADNI data application. Analysis results suggest that atrophy of CA1 and subiculum subregions may cause more severe behavioral deficits compared to CA2 and CA3 subregions. We further evaluate our method using simulations and provide theoretical guarantees.
Multiple systems estimation is a key approach for quantifying hidden populations such as the number of victims of modern slavery. The UK Government published an estimate of 10,000 to 13,000 victims, constructed by the present author, as part of the s
trategy leading to the Modern Slavery Act 2015. This estimate was obtained by a stepwise multiple systems method based on six lists. Further investigation shows that a small proportion of the possible models give rather different answers, and that other model fitting approaches may choose one of these. Three data sets collected in the field of modern slavery, together with a data set about the death toll in the Kosovo conflict, are used to investigate the stability and robustness of various multiple systems estimate methods. The crucial aspect is the way that interactions between lists are modelled, because these can substantially affect the results. Model selection and Bayesian approaches are considered in detail, in particular to assess their stability and robustness when applied to real modern slavery data. A new Markov Chain Monte Carlo Bayesian approach is developed; overall, this gives robust and stable results at least for the examples considered. The software and datasets are freely and publicly available to facilitate wider implementation and further research.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
