اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدThe late-time radio behavior of GRB afterglows: testing the standard model
60
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
We examine a sample of 21 gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglow light curves at radio frequencies, and compare them to the X-ray and/or optical properties of the afterglows and to the predictions of the standard jet/fireball model. Our sample includes every textit{Swift} GRB with an X-ray light curve indicating a jet break and with a published radio light curve, as well as several other targets with observed X-ray or and/optical jet breaks. We examine the late-time decline of each burst, and attempt to fit an analytical model based on the standard GRB afterglow equations to each data set. We show that most of the events in our textit{Swift} GRB sample are incompatible with the radio light curve behavior predicted by conventional afterglow theory. Many exhibit a late-time radio decline incompatible with the post-break X-ray or optical afterglow. Only one radio afterglow in this sample, at any time, shows the eventually expected decline of $sim t^{-2}$, although two others show it in their mm light curve. Several others remain consistent with the standard model if such a decline began after the observations. The radio behavior alone does not, however, indicate whether a GRB can be fit by our modeling code. Indeed, several of the well-fit GRBs may only appear so due to a lack of multi-wavelength data. While a second source of emission can account for some of the anomalous radio behavior, our tests indicate this is often not the case unless the main jet component is simultaneously suppressed.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
Electromagnetic (EM) follow-up of gravitational wave (GW) candidates is important for verifying their astrophysical nature and studying their physical properties. While the next generation of GW detectors will have improved sensitivities to make the
first detection of GW events, their ability to localize these events will remain poor during the early days of their operation. This makes EM follow-up challenging for most telescopes. Many new low frequency radio instruments have come online recently or will come online over the next few years, and their wide fields of view allow them to cover large areas of the sky in a short amount of time. This paper studies comprehensively the detectability of radio afterglows from compact binary coalescence (CBC), a predicted GW source and the most promising progenitor of short gamma-ray bursts. We explore the properties of simulated afterglow lightcurves from the forward shock for a range of source and observer parameters, then we use these lightcurves to estimate the expected rates of detection for different radio instruments and survey methods. Detecting radio afterglows and constraining their properties and rates are feasible with the current and upcoming widefield radio instruments. As a result, widefield radio instruments will play an important role in the EM follow-up of GW events.
Deriving physical parameters from gamma-ray burst afterglow observations remains a challenge, even now, 20 years after the discovery of afterglows. The main reason for the lack of progress is that the peak of the synchrotron emission is in the sub-mm
range, thus requiring radio observations in conjunction with X-ray/optical/near-infrared data in order to measure the corresponding spectral slopes and consequently remove the ambiguity wrt. slow vs. fast cooling and the ordering of the characteristic frequencies. We observed GRB 151027B, the 1000th Swift-detected GRB, with GROND in the optical-NIR, ALMA in the sub-millimeter, ATCA in the radio band, and combine this with public Swift-XRT X-ray data. While some observations at crucial times only return upper limits or surprising features, the fireball model is narrowly constrained by our data set, and allows us to draw a consistent picture with a fully-determined parameter set. Surprisingly, we find rapid, large-amplitude flux density variations in the radio band which are extreme not only for GRBs, but generally for any radio source. We interpret these as scintillation effects, though the extreme nature requires either the scattering screen to be at much smaller distance than usually assumed, multiple screens, or a combination of the two.
We present a search for late-time rebrightening of radio emission from three supernovae (SNe) with associated gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). It has been previously proposed that the unusually energetic SNe associated with GRBs should enter the Sedov-Taylor
phase decades after the stellar explosion, and this SN remnant emission will outshine the GRB radio afterglow and be detectable at significant distances. We place deep limits on the radio luminosity of GRB 980425/SN 1998bw, GRB 030329/SN 2003dh and GRB 060218/SN 2006aj, 10-18 years after explosion, with our deepest limit being $L_{ u}$ $< 4 times 10^{26}$ erg s$^{-1}$ Hz$^{-1}$ for GRB 980425/SN 1998bw. We put constraints on the density of the surrounding medium for various assumed values of the microphysical parameters related to the magnetic field and synchrotron-emitting electrons. For GRB 060218/SN 2006aj and GRB 980425/SN 1998bw, these density limits have implications for the density profile of the surrounding medium, while the non-detection of GRB 030329/SN 2003dh implies that its afterglow will not be detectable anymore at GHz frequencies.
GRB200522A is a short duration gamma-ray burst (GRB) at redshift $z$=0.554 characterized by a bright infrared counterpart. A possible, although not unambiguous, interpretation of the observed emission is the onset of a luminous kilonova powered by a
rapidly rotating and highly-magnetized neutron star, known as magnetar. A bright radio flare, arising from the interaction of the kilonova ejecta with the surrounding medium, is a prediction of this model. Whereas the available dataset remains open to multiple interpretations (e.g. afterglow, r-process kilonova, magnetar-powered kilonova), long-term radio monitoring of this burst may be key to discriminate between models. We present our late-time upper limit on the radio emission of GRB200522A, carried out with the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array at 288 days after the burst. For kilonova ejecta with energy $E_{rm ej} approx 10^{53} rm erg$, as expected for a long-lived magnetar remnant, we can already rule out ejecta masses $M_{rm ej} lesssim0.03 mathrm{M}_odot$ for the most likely range of circumburst densities $ngtrsim 10^{-3}$ cm$^{-3}$. Observations on timescales of $approx$3-10 yr after the merger will probe larger ejecta masses up to $M_{rm ej} sim 0.1 mathrm{M}_odot$, providing a robust test to the magnetar scenario.
We present post-jet-break textit{HST}, VLA and textit{Chandra} observations of the afterglow of the long $gamma$-ray bursts GRB 160625B (between 69 and 209 days) and GRB 160509A (between 35 and 80 days). We calculate the post-jet-break decline rates
of the light curves, and find the afterglow of GRB 160625B inconsistent with a simple $t^{-3/4}$ steepening over the break, expected from the geometric effect of the jet edge entering our line of sight. However, the favored optical post-break decline ($f_{ u} propto t^{-1.96 pm 0.07}$) is also inconsistent with the $f_{ u} propto t^{-p}$ decline (where $p approx 2.3$ from the pre-break light curve), which is expected from exponential lateral expansion of the jet; perhaps suggesting lateral expansion that only affects a fraction of the jet. The post-break decline of GRB 160509A is consistent with both the $t^{-3/4}$ steepening and with $f_{ u} propto t^{-p}$. We also use {sc boxfit} to fit afterglow models to both light curves and find both to be energetically consistent with a millisecond magnetar central engine, although the magnetar parameters need to be extreme (i.e. $E sim 3 times 10^{52}$ erg). Finally, the late-time radio light curves of both afterglows are not reproduced well by {sc boxfit} and are inconsistent with predictions from the standard jet model; instead both are well represented by a single power law decline (roughly $f_{ u} propto t^{-1}$) with no breaks. This requires a highly chromatic jet break ($t_{j,mathrm{radio}} > 10 times t_{j,mathrm{optical}}$) and possibly a two-component jet for both bursts.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
