اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدSeparating Argument Structure from Logical Structure in AMR
65
0
0.0
(
0
)
تأليف
Johan Bos
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
The AMR (Abstract Meaning Representation) formalism for representing meaning of natural language sentences was not designed to deal with scope and quantifiers. By extending AMR with indices for contexts and formulating constraints on these contexts, a formalism is derived that makes correct prediction for inferences involving negation and bound variables. The attractive core predicate-argument structure of AMR is preserved. The resulting framework is similar to that of Discourse Representation Theory.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
Online debate forums provide users a platform to express their opinions on controversial topics while being exposed to opinions from diverse set of viewpoints. Existing work in Natural Language Processing (NLP) has shown that linguistic features extr
acted from the debate text and features encoding the characteristics of the audience are both critical in persuasion studies. In this paper, we aim to further investigate the role of discourse structure of the arguments from online debates in their persuasiveness. In particular, we use the factor graph model to obtain features for the argument structure of debates from an online debating platform and incorporate these features to an LSTM-based model to predict the debater that makes the most convincing arguments. We find that incorporating argument structure features play an essential role in achieving the better predictive performance in assessing the persuasiveness of the arguments in online debates.
Neural language models trained with a predictive or masked objective have proven successful at capturing short and long distance syntactic dependencies. Here, we focus on verb argument structure in German, which has the interesting property that verb
arguments may appear in a relatively free order in subordinate clauses. Therefore, checking that the verb argument structure is correct cannot be done in a strictly sequential fashion, but rather requires to keep track of the arguments cases irrespective of their orders. We introduce a new probing methodology based on minimal variation sets and show that both Transformers and LSTM achieve a score substantially better than chance on this test. As humans, they also show graded judgments preferring canonical word orders and plausible case assignments. However, we also found unexpected discrepancies in the strength of these effects, the LSTMs having difficulties rejecting ungrammatical sentences containing frequent argument structure types (double nominatives), and the Transformers tending to overgeneralize, accepting some infrequent word orders or implausible sentences that humans barely accept.
We propose a new approach for extracting argument structure from natural language texts that contain an underlying argument. Our approach comprises of two phases: Score Assignment and Structure Prediction. The Score Assignment phase trains models to
classify relations between argument units (Support, Attack or Neutral). To that end, different training strategies have been explored. We identify different linguistic and lexical features for training the classifiers. Through ablation study, we observe that our novel use of word-embedding features is most effective for this task. The Structure Prediction phase makes use of the scores from the Score Assignment phase to arrive at the optimal structure. We perform experiments on three argumentation datasets, namely, AraucariaDB, Debatepedia and Wikipedia. We also propose two baselines and observe that the proposed approach outperforms baseline systems for the final task of Structure Prediction.
Logical relations widely exist in human activities. Human use them for making judgement and decision according to various conditions, which are embodied in the form of emph{if-then} rules. As an important kind of cognitive intelligence, it is prerequ
isite of representing and storing logical relations rightly into computer systems so as to make automatic judgement and decision, especially for high-risk domains like medical diagnosis. However, current numeric ANN (Artificial Neural Network) models are good at perceptual intelligence such as image recognition while they are not good at cognitive intelligence such as logical representation, blocking the further application of ANN. To solve it, researchers have tried to design logical ANN models to represent and store logical relations. Although there are some advances in this research area, recent works still have disadvantages because the structures of these logical ANN models still dont map more directly with logical relations which will cause the corresponding logical relations cannot be read out from their network structures. Therefore, in order to represent logical relations more clearly by the neural network structure and to read out logical relations from it, this paper proposes a novel logical ANN model by designing the new logical neurons and links in demand of logical representation. Compared with the recent works on logical ANN models, this logical ANN model has more clear corresponding with logical relations using the more direct mapping method herein, thus logical relations can be read out following the connection patterns of the network structure. Additionally, less neurons are used.
Self-consistent treatment of cosmological structure formation and expansion within the context of classical general relativity may lead to extra expansion above that expected in a structureless universe. We argue that in comparison to an early-epoch,
extrapolated Einstein-de Sitter model, about 10-15% extra expansion is sufficient at the present to render superfluous the dark energy 68% contribution to the energy density budget, and that this is observationally realistic.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
