اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدA Regularized Opponent Model with Maximum Entropy Objective
146
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
In a single-agent setting, reinforcement learning (RL) tasks can be cast into an inference problem by introducing a binary random variable o, which stands for the optimality. In this paper, we redefine the binary random variable o in multi-agent setting and formalize multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) as probabilistic inference. We derive a variational lower bound of the likelihood of achieving the optimality and name it as Regularized Opponent Model with Maximum Entropy Objective (ROMMEO). From ROMMEO, we present a novel perspective on opponent modeling and show how it can improve the performance of training agents theoretically and empirically in cooperative games. To optimize ROMMEO, we first introduce a tabular Q-iteration method ROMMEO-Q with proof of convergence. We extend the exact algorithm to complex environments by proposing an approximate version, ROMMEO-AC. We evaluate these two algorithms on the challenging iterated matrix game and differential game respectively and show that they can outperform strong MARL baselines.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
In the real world, many tasks require multiple agents to cooperate with each other under the condition of local observations. To solve such problems, many multi-agent reinforcement learning methods based on Centralized Training with Decentralized Exe
cution have been proposed. One representative class of work is value decomposition, which decomposes the global joint Q-value $Q_text{jt}$ into individual Q-values $Q_a$ to guide individuals behaviors, e.g. VDN (Value-Decomposition Networks) and QMIX. However, these baselines often ignore the randomness in the situation. We propose MMD-MIX, a method that combines distributional reinforcement learning and value decomposition to alleviate the above weaknesses. Besides, to improve data sampling efficiency, we were inspired by REM (Random Ensemble Mixture) which is a robust RL algorithm to explicitly introduce randomness into the MMD-MIX. The experiments demonstrate that MMD-MIX outperforms prior baselines in the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge (SMAC) environment.
When one agent interacts with a multi-agent environment, it is challenging to deal with various opponents unseen before. Modeling the behaviors, goals, or beliefs of opponents could help the agent adjust its policy to adapt to different opponents. In
addition, it is also important to consider opponents who are learning simultaneously or capable of reasoning. However, existing work usually tackles only one of the aforementioned types of opponent. In this paper, we propose model-based opponent modeling (MBOM), which employs the environment model to adapt to all kinds of opponent. MBOM simulates the recursive reasoning process in the environment model and imagines a set of improving opponent policies. To effectively and accurately represent the opponent policy, MBOM further mixes the imagined opponent policies according to the similarity with the real behaviors of opponents. Empirically, we show that MBOM achieves more effective adaptation than existing methods in competitive and cooperative environments, respectively with different types of opponent, i.e., fixed policy, naive learner, and reasoning learner.
Bounded rationality is an important consideration stemming from the fact that agents often have limits on their processing abilities, making the assumption of perfect rationality inapplicable to many real tasks. We propose an information-theoretic ap
proach to the inference of agent decisions under Smithian competition. The model explicitly captures the boundedness of agents (limited in their information-processing capacity) as the cost of information acquisition for expanding their prior beliefs. The expansion is measured as the Kullblack-Leibler divergence between posterior decisions and prior beliefs. When information acquisition is free, the homo economicus agent is recovered, while in cases when information acquisition becomes costly, agents instead revert to their prior beliefs. The maximum entropy principle is used to infer least-biased decisions based upon the notion of Smithian competition formalised within the Quantal Response Statistical Equilibrium framework. The incorporation of prior beliefs into such a framework allowed us to systematically explore the effects of prior beliefs on decision-making in the presence of market feedback, as well as importantly adding a temporal interpretation to the framework. We verified the proposed model using Australian housing market data, showing how the incorporation of prior knowledge alters the resulting agent decisions. Specifically, it allowed for the separation of past beliefs and utility maximisation behaviour of the agent as well as the analysis into the evolution of agent beliefs.
When it comes to large-scale multi-agent systems with a diverse set of agents, traditional differential privacy (DP) mechanisms are ill-matched because they consider a very broad class of adversaries, and they protect all users, independent of their
characteristics, by the same guarantee. Achieving a meaningful privacy leads to pronounced reduction in solution quality. Such assumptions are unnecessary in many real-world applications for three key reasons: (i) users might be willing to disclose less sensitive information (e.g., city of residence, but not exact location), (ii) the attacker might posses auxiliary information (e.g., city of residence in a mobility-on-demand system, or reviewer expertise in a paper assignment problem), and (iii) domain characteristics might exclude a subset of solutions (an expert on auctions would not be assigned to review a robotics paper, thus there is no need for indistinguishably between reviewers on different fields). We introduce Piecewise Local Differential Privacy (PLDP), a privacy model designed to protect the utility function in applications where the attacker possesses additional information on the characteristics of the utility space. PLDP enables a high degree of privacy, while being applicable to real-world, unboundedly large settings. Moreover, we propose PALMA, a privacy-preserving heuristic for maximum-weight matching. We evaluate PALMA in a vehicle-passenger matching scenario using real data and demonstrate that it provides strong privacy, $varepsilon leq 3$ and a median of $varepsilon = 0.44$, and high quality matchings ($10.8%$ worse than the non-private optimal).
Mixture models are an expressive hypothesis class that can approximate a rich set of policies. However, using mixture policies in the Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) framework is not straightforward. The entropy of a mixture model is not equal to the sum of
its components, nor does it have a closed-form expression in most cases. Using such policies in MaxEnt algorithms, therefore, requires constructing a tractable approximation of the mixture entropy. In this paper, we derive a simple, low-variance mixture-entropy estimator. We show that it is closely related to the sum of marginal entropies. Equipped with our entropy estimator, we derive an algorithmic variant of Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) to the mixture policy case and evaluate it on a series of continuous control tasks.
الأسئلة المقترحة
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
