ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
To properly assess the impact of (cooperative) adaptive cruise control ACC (CACC), one has to model vehicle dynamics. First of all, one has to choose the car following model, as it determines the vehicle flow as vehicles accelerate from standstill or decelerate because of the obstacle ahead. The other factor significantly affecting the intersection throughput is the maximal vehicle acceleration rate. In this paper, we analyze three car following behaviors: Gipps model, Improved Intelligent Driver Model (IIDM) and Helly model. Gipps model exhibits rather aggressive acceleration behavior. If used for the intersection throughput estimation, this model would lead to overly optimistic results. Helly model is convenient to analyze due to its linear nature, but its deceleration behavior in the presence of obstacles ahead is unrealistically abrupt. Showing the most realistic acceleration and deceleration behavior of the three models, IIDM is suited for ACC/CACC impact evaluation better than the other two. We discuss the influence of the maximal vehicle acceleration rate and presence of different portions of ACC/CACC vehicles on intersection throughput in the context of the three car following models. The analysis is done for two cases: (1) free road downstream of the intersection; and (2) red light at some distance downstream of the intersection. Finally, we introduce the platoon model and evaluate ACC and CACC with platooning in terms of travel time ad network throughput using SUMO simulation of the 4-mile stretch of Colorado Boulevard / Huntington Drive arterial with 13 signalized intersections in Arcadia, Southern California.
The paper evaluates the influence of the maximum vehicle acceleration and variable proportions of ACC/CACC vehicles on the throughput of an intersection. Two cases are studied: (1) free road downstream of the intersection; and (2) red light at some d
Connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) have the potential to address the safety, mobility and sustainability issues of our current transportation systems. Cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC), for example, is one promising technology to allow
This paper is about obtaining stable vehicle platooning by using Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control when the communication is unreliable and suffers from message losses. We model communication losses as independent random events and we propose an or
Emergent cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) strategies being proposed in the literature for platoon formation in the Connected Autonomous Vehicle (CAV) context mostly assume idealized fixed information flow topologies (IFTs) for the platoon,
Vehicle-to-vehicle communications can be unreliable as interference causes communication failures. Thereby, the information flow topology for a platoon of Connected Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) can vary dynamically. This limits existing Cooperative Ada