اشترك بالحزمة الذهبية واحصل على وصول غير محدود شمرا أكاديميا
تسجيل مستخدم جديدFoundations of Total Functional Data-Flow Programming
39
0
0.0
(
0
)
اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث
ﻻ يوجد ملخص باللغة العربية
The field of declarative stream programming (discrete time, clocked synchronous, modular, data-centric) is divided between the data-flow graph paradigm favored by domain experts, and the functional reactive paradigm favored by academics. In this paper, we describe the foundations of a framework for unifying functional and data-flow styles that differs from FRP proper in significant ways: It is based on set theory to match the expectations of domain experts, and the two paradigms are reduced symmetrically to a low-level middle ground, with strongly compositional semantics. The design of the framework is derived from mathematical first principles, in particular coalgebraic coinduction and a standard relational model of stateful computation. The abstract syntax and semantics introduced here constitute the full core of a novel stream programming language.
قيم البحث
اقرأ أيضاً
The possibility of translating logic programs into functional ones has long been a subject of investigation. Common to the many approaches is that the original logic program, in order to be translated, needs to be well-moded and this has led to the c
ommon understanding that these programs can be considered to be the ``functional part of logic programs. As a consequence of this it has become widely accepted that ``complex logical variables, the possibility of a dynamic selection rule, and general properties of non-well-moded programs are exclusive features of logic programs. This is not quite true, as some of these features are naturally found in lazy functional languages. We readdress the old question of what features are exclusive to the logic programming paradigm by defining a simple translation applicable to a wider range of logic programs, and demonstrate that the current circumscription is unreasonably restrictive.
While modern software development heavily uses versioned packages, programming languages rarely support the concept
This report aggregates the papers presented at the twenty-first annual Scheme and Functional Programming Workshop, hosted on August 28th, 2020, online and co-located with the twenty-fifth International Conference on Functional Programming. The Scheme
and Functional Programming Workshop is held every year to provide an opportunity for researchers and practitioners using Scheme and related functional programming languages like Racket, Clojure, and Lisp, to share research findings and discuss the future of the Scheme programming language.
This volume contains the proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Mathematically Structured Functional Programming (MSFP 2020). The meeting was originally scheduled to take place in Dublin, Ireland on the 25th of April as a satellite event of the Europe
an Joint Conferences on Theory & Practice of Software (ETAPS 2020). Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, ETAPS 2020, and consequently MSFP 2020, has been postponed to a date yet to be determined. The MSFP workshop highlights applications of mathematical structures to programming applications. We promote the use of category theory, type theory, and formal language semantics to the development of simple and reasonable programs. This years papers cover a variety of topics ranging from array programming to dependent types to effects.
Programmers frequently maintain implicit data invariants, which are relations between different data structures in a program. Traditionally, such invariants are manually enforced and checked by programmers. This ad-hoc practice is difficult because t
he programmer must manually account for all the locations and configurations that break an invariant. Moreover, implicit invariants are brittle under code-evolution: when the invariants and data structures change, the programmer must repeat the process of manually repairing all of the code locations where invariants are violated. A much better approach is to introduce data invariants as a language feature and rely on language support to maintain invariants. To handle this challenge, we introduce Targeted Synthesis, a technique for integrating data invariants with invariant-agnostic imperative code at compile-time. This technique is nontrivial due to the complex structure of both invariant specifications, as well as general imperative code. The key insight is to take a language co-design approach involving both the language of data invariants, as well as the imperative language. We leverage this insight to produce two high-level results: first, we support a language with iterators without requiring general quantified reasoning, and second, we infer complicated invariant-preserving patches. We evaluate these claims through a language termed Spyder, a core calculus of data invariants over imperative iterator programs. We evaluate the expressiveness and performance of Spyder on a variety of programs inspired by web applications, and we find that Spyder efficiently compiles and maintains data invariants.
سجل دخول لتتمكن من نشر تعليقات
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
