ترغب بنشر مسار تعليمي؟ اضغط هنا

Error estimates for interpolation of rough data using the scattered shifts of a radial basis function

133   0   0.0 ( 0 )
 نشر من قبل Robert Brownlee
 تاريخ النشر 2007
  مجال البحث
والبحث باللغة English
 تأليف R. A. Brownlee




اسأل ChatGPT حول البحث

The error between appropriately smooth functions and their radial basis function interpolants, as the interpolation points fill out a bounded domain in R^d, is a well studied artifact. In all of these cases, the analysis takes place in a natural function space dictated by the choice of radial basis function -- the native space. The native space contains functions possessing a certain amount of smoothness. This paper establishes error estimates when the function being interpolated is conspicuously rough.

قيم البحث

اقرأ أيضاً

We present the error analysis of Lagrange interpolation on triangles. A new textit{a priori} error estimate is derived in which the bound is expressed in terms of the diameter and circumradius of a triangle. No geometric conditions on triangles are i mposed in order to get this type of error estimates.
Data sites selected from modeling high-dimensional problems often appear scattered in non-paternalistic ways. Except for sporadic-clustering at some spots, they become relatively far apart as the dimension of the ambient space grows. These features d efy any theoretical treatment that requires local or global quasi-uniformity of distribution of data sites. Incorporating a recently-developed application of integral operator theory in machine learning, we propose and study in the current article a new framework to analyze kernel interpolation of high dimensional data, which features bounding stochastic approximation error by a hybrid (discrete and continuous) $K$-functional tied to the spectrum of the underlying kernel matrix. Both theoretical analysis and numerical simulations show that spectra of kernel matrices are reliable and stable barometers for gauging the performance of kernel-interpolation methods for high dimensional data.
We propose a general theory of estimating interpolation error for smooth functions in two and three dimensions. In our theory, the error of interpolation is bound in terms of the diameter of a simplex and a geometric parameter. In the two-dimensional case, our geometric parameter is equivalent to the circumradius of a triangle. In the three-dimensional case, our geometric parameter also represents the flatness of a tetrahedron. Through the introduction of the geometric parameter, the error estimates newly obtained can be applied to cases that violate the maximum-angle condition.
99 - Jan Glaubitz , Anne Gelb 2021
It is well understood that boundary conditions (BCs) may cause global radial basis function (RBF) methods to become unstable for hyperbolic conservation laws (CLs). Here we investigate this phenomenon and identify the strong enforcement of BCs as the mechanism triggering such stability issues. Based on this observation we propose a technique to weakly enforce BCs in RBF methods. In the case of hyperbolic CLs, this is achieved by carefully building RBF methods from the weak form of the CL, rather than the typically enforced strong form. Furthermore, we demonstrate that global RBF methods may violate conservation, yielding physically unreasonable solutions when the approximation does not take into account these considerations. Numerical experiments validate our theoretical results.
We present a general theory of interpolation error estimates for smooth functions and inverse inequalities on anisotropic meshes. In our theory, the error of interpolation is bound in terms of the diameter of a simplex and a geometric parameter. In t he two-dimensional case, our geometric parameter is equivalent to the circumradius of a triangle. In the three-dimensional case, our geometric parameter also represents the flatness of a tetrahedron. This paper also includes corrections to an error in General theory of interpolation error estimates on anisotropic meshes (Japan Journal of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 38 (2021) 163-191), in which Theorem 2 was incorrect.
التعليقات
جاري جلب التعليقات جاري جلب التعليقات
سجل دخول لتتمكن من متابعة معايير البحث التي قمت باختيارها
mircosoft-partner

هل ترغب بارسال اشعارات عن اخر التحديثات في شمرا-اكاديميا