We present a unique experimental configuration that allows us to determine the interfacial forces on nearly parallel plates made from the thinnest possible mechanical structures, single and few layer graphene membranes. Our approach consists of using
a pressure difference across a graphene membrane to bring the membrane to within ~ 10-20 nm above a circular post covered with SiOx or Au until a critical point is reached whereby the membrane snaps into adhesive contact with the post. Continuous measurements of the deforming membrane with an AFM coupled with a theoretical model allow us to deduce the magnitude of the interfacial forces between graphene and SiOx and graphene and Au. The nature of the interfacial forces at ~ 10 - 20 nm separations is consistent with an inverse fourth power distance dependence, implying that the interfacial forces are dominated by van der Waals interactions. Furthermore, the strength of the interactions is found to increase linearly with the number of graphene layers. The experimental approach can be used to measure the strength of the interfacial forces for other atomically thin two-dimensional materials, and help guide the development of nanomechanical devices such as switches, resonators, and sensors.
We study the mechanics of pressurized graphene membranes using an experimental configuration that allows the determination of the elasticity of graphene and the adhesion energy between a substrate and a graphene (or other two-dimensional solid) membr
ane. The test consists of a monolayer graphene membrane adhered to a substrate by surface forces. The substrate is patterned with etched microcavities of a prescribed volume and when they are covered with the graphene monolayer it traps a fixed number (N) of gas molecules in the microchamber. By lowering the ambient pressure, and thus changing the pressure difference across the graphene membrane, the membrane can be made to bulge and delaminate in a stable manner from the substrate. Here we describe the analysis of the membrane/substrate as a thermodynamic system and explore the behavior of the system over representative experimentally-accessible geometry and loading parameters. We carry out companion experiments and compare them to the theoretical predictions and then use the theory and experiments together to determine the adhesion energy of graphene/SiO2 interfaces. We find an average adhesion energy of 0.24 J/m2 which is lower, but in line with our previously reported values. We assert that this test, which we call the constant N blister test, is a valuable approach to determine the adhesion energy between two-dimensional solid membranes and a substrate, which is an important, but not well-understood aspect of behavior. The test also provides valuable information that can serve as the basis for subsequent research to understand the mechanisms contributing to the observed adhesion energy. Finally, we show how in the limit of a large microcavity, the constant N test approaches the behavior observed in a constant pressure blister test and we provide an experimental observation that suggests this behavior.
As mechanical structures enter the nanoscale regime, the influence of van der Waals forces increases. Graphene is attractive for nanomechanical systems because its Youngs modulus and strength are both intrinsically high, but the mechanical behavior o
f graphene is also strongly influenced by the van der Waals force. For example, this force clamps graphene samples to substrates, and also holds together the individual graphene sheets in multilayer samples. Here we use a pressurized blister test to directly measure the adhesion energy of graphene sheets with a silicon oxide substrate. We find an adhesion energy of 0.45 pm 0.02 J/m2 for monolayer graphene and 0.31 pm 0.03 J/m2 for samples containing 2-5 graphene sheets. These values are larger than the adhesion energies measured in typical micromechanical structures and are comparable to solid/liquid adhesion energies. We attribute this to the extreme flexibility of graphene, which allows it to conform to the topography of even the smoothest substrates, thus making its interaction with the substrate more liquid-like than solid-like.
