Analyzing Network Reliability Using Structural Motifs

This paper uses the reliability polynomial, introduced by Moore and Shannon in 1956, to analyze the effect of network structure on diffusive dynamics such as the spread of infectious disease. We exhibit a representation for the reliability polynomial in terms of what we call {em structural motifs} that is well suited for reasoning about the effect of a networks structural properties on diffusion across the network. We illustrate by deriving several general results relating graph structure to dynamical phenomena.

Network Reliability: The effect of local network structure on diffusive processes

This paper re-introduces the network reliability polynomial - introduced by Moore and Shannon in 1956 -- for studying the effect of network structure on the spread of diseases. We exhibit a representation of the polynomial that is well-suited for estimation by distributed simulation. We describe a collection of graphs derived from ErdH{o}s-Renyi and scale-free-like random graphs in which we have manipulated assortativity-by-degree and the number of triangles. We evaluate the network reliability for all these graphs under a reliability rule that is related to the expected size of a connected component. Through these extensive simulations, we show that for positively or neutrally assortative graphs, swapping edges to increase the number of triangles does not increase the network reliability. Also, positively assortative graphs are more reliable than neutral or disassortative graphs with the same number of edges. Moreover, we show the combined effect of both assortativity-by-degree and the presence of triangles on the critical point and the size of the smallest subgraph that is reliable.

Generalized individual-based epidemic model for vulnerability assessment of correlated scale-free complex networks

Many complex networks exhibit vulnerability to spreading of epidemics, and such vulnerability relates to the viral strain as well as to the network characteristics. For instance, the structure of the network plays an important role in spreading of epidemics. Additionally, properties of previous epidemic models require prior knowledge of the complex network structure, which means the models are limited to only well-known network structures. In this paper, we propose a new epidemiological SIR model based on the continuous time Markov chain, which is generalized to any type of network. The new model is capable of evaluating the states of every individual in the network. Through mathematical analysis, we prove an epidemic threshold exists below which an epidemic does not propagate in the network. We also show that the new epidemic threshold is inversely proportional to the spectral radius of the network. In particular, we employ the new epidemic model as a novel measure to assess the vulnerability of networks to the spread of epidemics. The new measure considers all possible effective infection rates that an epidemic might possess. Next, we apply the measure to correlated networks to evaluate the vulnerability of disassortative and assortative scalefree networks. Ultimately, we verify the accuracy of the theoretical epidemic threshold through extensive numerical simulations. Within the set of tested networks, the numerical results show that disassortative scale-free networks are more vulnerable to spreading of epidemics than assortative scale-free networks.

Characterizing the Robustness of Complex Networks

With increasingly ambitious initiatives such as GENI and FIND that seek to design the future Internet, it becomes imperative to define the characteristics of robust topologies, and build future networks optimized for robustness. This paper investigates the characteristics of network topologies that maintain a high level of throughput in spite of multiple attacks. To this end, we select network topologies belonging to the main network models and some real world networks. We consider three types of attacks: removal of random nodes, high degree nodes, and high betweenness nodes. We use elasticity as our robustness measure and, through our analysis, illustrate that different topologies can have different degrees of robustness. In particular, elasticity can fall as low as 0.8% of the upper bound based on the attack employed. This result substantiates the need for optimized network topology design. Furthermore, we implement a tradeoff function that combines elasticity under the three attack strategies and considers the cost of the network. Our extensive simulations show that, for a given network density, regular and semi-regular topologies can have higher degrees of robustness than heterogeneous topologies, and that link redundancy is a sufficient but not necessary condition for robustness.