Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userUAntwerp at SemEval-2021 Task 5: Spans are Spans, stacking a binary word level approach to toxic span detection
UANTWERP في مهمة Semeval-2021: تمتد Spans، تكديس نهج مستوى Word ثنائي للكشف عن SPAN SPAN
241
0 0
0.0
(
0
)
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
توضح هذه الورقة النظام الذي طوره مركز أنتويرب للعلوم الإنسانية الرقمية والنقد الأدبي [UANTWERP] للكشف عن السامة.استخدمنا مجموعة تعميم مكدسة من خمسة نماذج مكونة، مع تفسيرات مميزة للمهمة.حاولت نماذج التنبؤ بتسمم سمية الكلمات الثنائية بناء على تسلسل النجرام، بينما تم تدريب 3 نماذج قاسية قائمة على أساس أن توقع ملصقات رمزية سامة بناء على الرموز التسلسلية الكاملة.تم فرك تنبؤات النماذج الخمس داخل نموذج LSTM.بالإضافة إلى وصف النظام، نقوم بإجراء تحليل الأخطاء لاستكشاف الأداء النموذجي فيما يتعلق بالميزات النصية.سجل النظام الموصوف في هذه الورقة 0.6755 واحتل المرتبة 26.
This paper describes the system developed by the Antwerp Centre for Digital humanities and literary Criticism [UAntwerp] for toxic span detection. We used a stacked generalisation ensemble of five component models, with two distinct interpretations of the task. Two models attempted to predict binary word toxicity based on ngram sequences, whilst 3 categorical span based models were trained to predict toxic token labels based on complete sequence tokens. The five models' predictions were ensembled within an LSTM model. As well as describing the system, we perform error analysis to explore model performance in relation to textual features. The system described in this paper scored 0.6755 and ranked 26th.
References used
https://aclanthology.org/
rate research
Read More
This paper presents our system submission to task 5: Toxic Spans Detection of the SemEval-2021 competition. The competition aims at detecting the spans that make a toxic span toxic. In this paper, we demonstrate our system for detecting toxic spans,
which includes expanding the toxic training set with Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME), fine-tuning RoBERTa model for detection, and error analysis. We found that feeding the model with an expanded training set using Reddit comments of polarized-toxicity and labeling with LIME on top of logistic regression classification could help RoBERTa more accurately learn to recognize toxic spans. We achieved a span-level F1 score of 0.6715 on the testing phase. Our quantitative and qualitative results show that the predictions from our system could be a good supplement to the gold training set's annotations.
This paper presents our submission to SemEval-2021 Task 5: Toxic Spans Detection. The purpose of this task is to detect the spans that make a text toxic, which is a complex labour for several reasons. Firstly, because of the intrinsic subjectivity of
toxicity, and secondly, due to toxicity not always coming from single words like insults or offends, but sometimes from whole expressions formed by words that may not be toxic individually. Following this idea of focusing on both single words and multi-word expressions, we study the impact of using a multi-depth DistilBERT model, which uses embeddings from different layers to estimate the final per-token toxicity. Our quantitative results show that using information from multiple depths boosts the performance of the model. Finally, we also analyze our best model qualitatively.
This article introduces the system description of the hub team, which explains the related work and experimental results of our team's participation in SemEval 2021 Task 5: Toxic Spans Detection. The data for this shared task comes from some posts on
the Internet. The task goal is to identify the toxic content contained in these text data. We need to find the span of the toxic text in the text data as accurately as possible. In the same post, the toxic text may be one paragraph or multiple paragraphs. Our team uses a classification scheme based on word-level to accomplish this task. The system we used to submit the results is ALBERT+BILSTM+CRF. The result evaluation index of the task submission is the F1 score, and the final score of the prediction result of the test set submitted by our team is 0.6640226029.
In recent years, the widespread use of social media has led to an increase in the generation of toxic and offensive content on online platforms. In response, social media platforms have worked on developing automatic detection methods and employing h
uman moderators to cope with this deluge of offensive content. While various state-of-the-art statistical models have been applied to detect toxic posts, there are only a few studies that focus on detecting the words or expressions that make a post offensive. This motivates the organization of the SemEval-2021 Task 5: Toxic Spans Detection competition, which has provided participants with a dataset containing toxic spans annotation in English posts. In this paper, we present the WLV-RIT entry for the SemEval-2021 Task 5. Our best performing neural transformer model achieves an 0.68 F1-Score. Furthermore, we develop an open-source framework for multilingual detection of offensive spans, i.e., MUDES, based on neural transformers that detect toxic spans in texts.
Toxic language is often present in online forums, especially when politics and other polarizing topics arise, and can lead to people becoming discouraged from joining or continuing conversations. In this paper, we use data consisting of comments with
the indices of toxic text labelled to train an RNN to deter-mine which parts of the comments make them toxic, which could aid online moderators. We compare results using both the original dataset and an augmented set, as well as GRU versus LSTM RNN models.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
