Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userStanford Matrix Considered Harmful
119
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Sebastiano Vigna
Publication date
2007
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Authors
Sebastiano Vigna
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
This note argues about the validity of web-graph data used in the literature.
rate research
Read More
Deep learning emerges as an important new resource-intensive workload and has been successfully applied in computer vision, speech, natural language processing, and so on. Distributed deep learning is becoming a necessity to cope with growing data and model sizes. Its computation is typically characterized by a simple tensor data abstraction to model multi-dimensional matrices, a data-flow graph to model computation, and iterative executions with relatively frequent synchronizations, thereby making it substantially different from Map/Reduce style distributed big data computation. RPC, commonly used as the communication primitive, has been adopted by popular deep learning frameworks such as TensorFlow, which uses gRPC. We show that RPC is sub-optimal for distributed deep learning computation, especially on an RDMA-capable network. The tensor abstraction and data-flow graph, coupled with an RDMA network, offers the opportunity to reduce the unnecessary overhead (e.g., memory copy) without sacrificing programmability and generality. In particular, from a data access point of view, a remote machine is abstracted just as a device on an RDMA channel, with a simple memory interface for allocating, reading, and writing memory regions. Our graph analyzer looks at both the data flow graph and the tensors to optimize memory allocation and remote data access using this interface. The result is up to 25 times speedup in representative deep learning benchmarks against the standard gRPC in TensorFlow and up to 169% improvement even against an RPC implementation optimized for RDMA, leading to faster convergence in the training process.
Knowledge bases (KBs) about notable entities and their properties are an important asset in applications such as search, question answering and dialogue. All popular KBs capture virtually only positive statements, and abstain from taking any stance on statements not stored in the KB. This paper makes the case for explicitly stating salient statements that do not hold. Negative statements are useful to overcome limitations of question answering systems that are mainly geared for positive questions; they can also contribute to informative summaries of entities. Due to the abundance of such invalid statements, any effort to compile them needs to address ranking by saliency. We present a statisticalinference method for compiling and ranking negative statements, based on expectations from positive statements of related entities in peer groups. Experimental results, with a variety of datasets, show that the method can effectively discover notable negative statements, and extrinsic studies underline their usefulness for entity summarization. Datasets and code are released as resources for further research.
The properties of individual neurons are often analyzed in order to understand the biological and artificial neural networks in which theyre embedded. Class selectivity-typically defined as how different a neurons responses are across different classes of stimuli or data samples-is commonly used for this purpose. However, it remains an open question whether it is necessary and/or sufficient for deep neural networks (DNNs) to learn class selectivity in individual units. We investigated the causal impact of class selectivity on network function by directly regularizing for or against class selectivity. Using this regularizer to reduce class selectivity across units in convolutional neural networks increased test accuracy by over 2% for ResNet18 trained on Tiny ImageNet. For ResNet20 trained on CIFAR10 we could reduce class selectivity by a factor of 2.5 with no impact on test accuracy, and reduce it nearly to zero with only a small ($sim$2%) drop in test accuracy. In contrast, regularizing to increase class selectivity significantly decreased test accuracy across all models and datasets. These results indicate that class selectivity in individual units is neither sufficient nor strictly necessary, and can even impair DNN performance. They also encourage caution when focusing on the properties of single units as representative of the mechanisms by which DNNs function.
Recommender system usually suffers from severe popularity bias -- the collected interaction data usually exhibits quite imbalanced or even long-tailed distribution over items. Such skewed distribution may result from the users conformity to the group, which deviates from reflecting users true preference. Existing efforts for tackling this issue mainly focus on completely eliminating popularity bias. However, we argue that not all popularity bias is evil. Popularity bias not only results from conformity but also item quality, which is usually ignored by existing methods. Some items exhibit higher popularity as they have intrinsic better property. Blindly removing the popularity bias would lose such important signal, and further deteriorate model performance. To sufficiently exploit such important information for recommendation, it is essential to disentangle the benign popularity bias caused by item quality from the harmful popularity bias caused by conformity. Although important, it is quite challenging as we lack an explicit signal to differentiate the two factors of popularity bias. In this paper, we propose to leverage temporal information as the two factors exhibit quite different patterns along the time: item quality revealing item inherent property is stable and static while conformity that depends on items recent clicks is highly time-sensitive. Correspondingly, we further propose a novel Time-aware DisEntangled framework (TIDE), where a click is generated from three components namely the static item quality, the dynamic conformity effect, as well as the user-item matching score returned by any recommendation model. Lastly, we conduct interventional inference such that the recommendation can benefit from the benign popularity bias while circumvent the harmful one. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrated the effectiveness of TIDE.
We propose a novel algorithm for sequential matrix completion in a recommender system setting, where the $(i,j)$th entry of the matrix corresponds to a user $i$s rating of product $j$. The objective of the algorithm is to provide a sequential policy for user-product pair recommendation which will yield the highest possible ratings after a finite time horizon. The algorithm uses a Gamma process factor model with two posterior-focused bandit policies, Thompson Sampling and Information-Directed Sampling. While Thompson Sampling shows competitive performance in simulations, state-of-the-art performance is obtained from Information-Directed Sampling, which makes its recommendations based off a ratio between the expected reward and a measure of information gain. To our knowledge, this is the first implementation of Information Directed Sampling on large real datasets. This approach contributes to a recent line of research on bandit approaches to collaborative filtering including Kawale et al. (2015), Li et al. (2010), Bresler et al. (2014), Li et al. (2016), Deshpande & Montanari (2012), and Zhao et al. (2013). The setting of this paper, as has been noted in Kawale et al. (2015) and Zhao et al. (2013), presents significant challenges to bounding regret after finite horizons. We discuss these challenges in relation to simpler models for bandits with side information, such as linear or gaussian process bandits, and hope the experiments presented here motivate further research toward theoretical guarantees.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
