يحاول هذا البحث أن يسلّط الضّوء على حتمية التّحوّلات النّصية الدّقيقة خلال عملية الترجمة. فالإدّعاء القائل إنّ التّرجمة تستلزم التّحولات قد تمّ التّثبّت منه من خلال ترجمة بعض نماذج نظم الكلام النّصية الدّقيقة التقليدية و غير التّقليدية في اللغة الإنكليزية إلى اللغة العربية. و رغم أنّ بعض أصحاب النّظريات في التّرجمة فهم التّحوّلات على أنّها مؤشّر ضعفٍ لا مفرَّ منه، فإنّ البعض الآخر يتحقّق من أهمّيتها في مخاطبة المتلقِّين في النّص الهدف بصورةٍ ناجعةٍ لدرجة القول إن لا ترجمة َهناك دون تحوّل. و لسوف تساهم مهارة المترجم و خبرته في الإشراف و التّدبير المُلازِمَين للتّحوّلات النّصيّة الدّقيقة لهذه النّماذج، كون المترجم هو محلِّل رموز شيفرة النّص الأصلي و مركِّب رموز شيفرة النّص الهدف. لقد عُرِّفت الأمانة في التّرجمة ليس من خلال علاقتها بالحرفية المنشودة كثيراً و الالتصاق التّام بالنّص الأصليّ بقدر ما هي مؤشرٌ لمدى إسهام التّحوّلات النّصية الدّقيقة في مساعدة المترجمين على محاكاة المبتغى البلاغي للنّصّ الأصليّ, و ضمان قبول المتلقِّين له و إقبالهم على قراءته في لغة النّصّ الهدف و ثقافته.
This piece of research endeavours to highlight the inevitability of the
micro-textonymic transformations throughout the process of translation. The claim that translation necessitates transformation has been ascertained through rendering a few non/conventional micro-textonymic English collocational patterns into Arabic. However, though some translation theorists comprehend transformations as a remark of inescapable weakness, others maintain its prominence in successfully communicating the TL recipients, to the extent that there is no transation without transformation. Translator's skilfulness and expertise would closely monitor and manage such micro-textonymic transformations, being the decoder of the ST and re-encoder of the TT. Faithfulness in translation has been defined not in relation to extremely possible literalism and adherence to the ST, rather, it stands as a remark of how far do such micro-textonymic transformations help translators communicate the rhetoric of the ST, and guarantee acceptance and readability in the TL language and culture.
References used
Aixela, Javier Franco. "Culture-Specific Items in Translation". In Translation, Power, Subversion. Edited by: Roman Alvarez and M. Carmen-Africa Vidal. Clevedon, Philadelphia. Adelaide: Multilingual Matters LTD. 1996. pp. 52-78
Baalbaki, Munir and Baalbaki, Rohi. Al-Mawrid English-Arabic Arabic-English. Beirut: Dar El-Ilm Lilmalayen. 1998
Baker, Mona. In Other Words A Coursebook on Translation. London and New York: Routledge. 1992-2001
Paraphrase generation is an important task in natural language processing. Previous works focus on sentence-level paraphrase generation, while ignoring document-level paraphrase generation, which is a more challenging and valuable task. In this paper
Paraphrase identification (PI), a fundamental task in natural language processing, is to identify whether two sentences express the same or similar meaning, which is a binary classification problem. Recently, BERT-like pre-trained language models hav
A nominalization uses a deverbal noun to describe an event associated with its underlying verb. Commonly found in academic and formal texts, nominalizations can be difficult to interpret because of ambiguous semantic relations between the deverbal no
This paper focuses on paraphrase generation,which is a widely studied natural language generation task in NLP. With the development of neural models, paraphrase generation research has exhibited a gradual shift to neural methods in the recent years.
Transformer-based models have gained increasing popularity achieving state-of-the-art performance in many research fields including speech translation. However, Transformer's quadratic complexity with respect to the input sequence length prevents its