Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userInterrater Disagreement Resolution: A Systematic Procedure to Reach Consensus in Annotation Tasks
قرار الخلاف الدولي: إجراء منهجي للوصول إلى توافق في الآراء في مهام التوضيحية
339
0 0
0.0
(
0
)
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
نقدم إجراء منهجي لقرار الخلاف الدولي.الإجراء عام، ولكن الاستخدام بشكل خاص في مهام التعليق المتعددة موجهة نحو بناء الحقيقة الأرضية.نقوم بحفز اقتراحنا من خلال القول بأن هدف الحالات التي يحظر فيها هدف الباحثين هو استنباط نقاط وجهة نظر مختلفة، فإن الخلاف القاطع هو علامة على ضعف الجودة في التصميم أو وصف المهمة.إجماع في الآراء بين المحن المعلقين، نحافظ، يجب أن ينتضل، من خلال إجراء منهجي لحل الخلاف مثل الوصف الذي نصفه.
We present a systematic procedure for interrater disagreement resolution. The procedure is general, but of particular use in multiple-annotator tasks geared towards ground truth construction. We motivate our proposal by arguing that, barring cases in which the researchers' goal is to elicit different viewpoints, interrater disagreement is a sign of poor quality in the design or the description of a task. Consensus among annotators, we maintain, should be striven for, through a systematic procedure for disagreement resolution such as the one we describe.
References used
https://aclanthology.org/
rate research
Read More
This paper shows that CIDEr-D, a traditional evaluation metric for image description, does not work properly on datasets where the number of words in the sentence is significantly greater than those in the MS COCO Captions dataset. We also show that
CIDEr-D has performance hampered by the lack of multiple reference sentences and high variance of sentence length. To bypass this problem, we introduce CIDEr-R, which improves CIDEr-D, making it more flexible in dealing with datasets with high sentence length variance. We demonstrate that CIDEr-R is more accurate and closer to human judgment than CIDEr-D; CIDEr-R is more robust regarding the number of available references. Our results reveal that using Self-Critical Sequence Training to optimize CIDEr-R generates descriptive captions. In contrast, when CIDEr-D is optimized, the generated captions' length tends to be similar to the reference length. However, the models also repeat several times the same word to increase the sentence length.
Natural language inference (NLI) is the task of determining whether a piece of text is entailed, contradicted by or unrelated to another piece of text. In this paper, we investigate how to tease systematic inferences (i.e., items for which people agr
ee on the NLI label) apart from disagreement items (i.e., items which lead to different annotations), which most prior work has overlooked. To distinguish systematic inferences from disagreement items, we propose Artificial Annotators (AAs) to simulate the uncertainty in the annotation process by capturing the modes in annotations. Results on the CommitmentBank, a corpus of naturally occurring discourses in English, confirm that our approach performs statistically significantly better than all baselines. We further show that AAs learn linguistic patterns and context-dependent reasoning.
From statistical to neural models, a wide variety of topic modelling algorithms have been proposed in the literature. However, because of the diversity of datasets and metrics, there have not been many efforts to systematically compare their performa
nce on the same benchmarks and under the same conditions. In this paper, we present a selection of 9 topic modelling techniques from the state of the art reflecting a diversity of approaches to the task, an overview of the different metrics used to compare their performance, and the challenges of conducting such a comparison. We empirically evaluate the performance of these models on different settings reflecting a variety of real-life conditions in terms of dataset size, number of topics, and distribution of topics, following identical preprocessing and evaluation processes. Using both metrics that rely on the intrinsic characteristics of the dataset (different coherence metrics), as well as external knowledge (word embeddings and ground-truth topic labels), our experiments reveal several shortcomings regarding the common practices in topic models evaluation.
The purpose of this research is to study the performance of peroxide bleach
materials (sodium carbonate peroxy hydrate, sodium perborate mono hydrate,
sodium perborate tetra hydrate) within the low foam powder formula, in terms
of its rate of disi
ntegration with and without an activator, under different
temperatures, in order to obtain a high detergency low foam powder formula.
SemEval is the primary venue in the NLP community for the proposal of new challenges and for the systematic empirical evaluation of NLP systems. This paper provides a systematic quantitative analysis of SemEval aiming to evidence the patterns of the
contributions behind SemEval. By understanding the distribution of task types, metrics, architectures, participation and citations over time we aim to answer the question on what is being evaluated by SemEval.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
