Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userOn Releasing Annotator-Level Labels and Information in Datasets
عند إطلاق ملصقات ومعلومات على مستوى Annotator في مجموعات البيانات
120
0 0
0.0
(
0
)
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
تتضمن ممارسة شائعة في بناء مجموعات بيانات NLP، خاصة استخدام التعليقات التوضيحية من قبل الجمهور، الحصول على أحكام معلقية متعددة على نفس حالات البيانات، والتي يتم تسويتها بعد ذلك لإنتاج حقائق أو درجة أرضية واحدة، من خلال التصويت الأغلبية، المتوسط، أو الحكموبعدفي حين أن هذه النهج قد تكون مناسبة في مهام توضيحية معينة، تطل مثل هذه التجمعات على الطبيعة التي تم إنشاؤها اجتماعيا للتصورات الإنسانية التي تهدف الشروح عن المهام ذاتية نسبيا إلى الاستيلاء عليها.على وجه الخصوص، فإن الخلافات المنهجية بين المحن المعلقين بسبب خلفياتهم الاجتماعية والثقافية والتجارب العاشية غالبا ما يتم توعيتها من خلال هذه التجمعات.في هذه الورقة، نوضح تجريبيا أن تجميع الملصقات قد يعرض تحيزات تمثيلية من وجهات النظر الفردية والمجموعة.بناء على هذا النتيجة، نقترح مجموعة من توصيات لزيادة فائدة وشفافية مجموعات البيانات في حالات استخدام المصب.
A common practice in building NLP datasets, especially using crowd-sourced annotations, involves obtaining multiple annotator judgements on the same data instances, which are then flattened to produce a single ground truth'' label or score, through majority voting, averaging, or adjudication. While these approaches may be appropriate in certain annotation tasks, such aggregations overlook the socially constructed nature of human perceptions that annotations for relatively more subjective tasks are meant to capture. In particular, systematic disagreements between annotators owing to their socio-cultural backgrounds and/or lived experiences are often obfuscated through such aggregations. In this paper, we empirically demonstrate that label aggregation may introduce representational biases of individual and group perspectives. Based on this finding, we propose a set of recommendations for increased utility and transparency of datasets for downstream use cases.
References used
https://aclanthology.org/
rate research
Read More
Nowadays, social media platforms use classification models to cope with hate speech and abusive language. The problem of these models is their vulnerability to bias. A prevalent form of bias in hate speech and abusive language datasets is annotator b
ias caused by the annotator's subjective perception and the complexity of the annotation task. In our paper, we develop a set of methods to measure annotator bias in abusive language datasets and to identify different perspectives on abusive language. We apply these methods to four different abusive language datasets. Our proposed approach supports annotation processes of such datasets and future research addressing different perspectives on the perception of abusive language.
To highlight the challenges of achieving representation disentanglement for text domain in an unsupervised setting, in this paper we select a representative set of successfully applied models from the image domain. We evaluate these models on 6 disen
tanglement metrics, as well as on downstream classification tasks and homotopy. To facilitate the evaluation, we propose two synthetic datasets with known generative factors. Our experiments highlight the existing gap in the text domain and illustrate that certain elements such as representation sparsity (as an inductive bias), or representation coupling with the decoder could impact disentanglement. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first attempt on the intersection of unsupervised representation disentanglement and text, and provides the experimental framework and datasets for examining future developments in this direction.
To obtain high-quality sentence embeddings from pretrained language models (PLMs), they must either be augmented with additional pretraining objectives or finetuned on a large set of labeled text pairs. While the latter approach typically outperforms
the former, it requires great human effort to generate suitable datasets of sufficient size. In this paper, we show how PLMs can be leveraged to obtain high-quality sentence embeddings without the need for labeled data, finetuning or modifications to the pretraining objective: We utilize the generative abilities of large and high-performing PLMs to generate entire datasets of labeled text pairs from scratch, which we then use for finetuning much smaller and more efficient models. Our fully unsupervised approach outperforms strong baselines on several semantic textual similarity datasets.
Document-level human evaluation of machine translation (MT) has been raising interest in the community. However, little is known about the issues of using document-level methodologies to assess MT quality. In this article, we compare the inter-annota
tor agreement (IAA) scores, the effort to assess the quality in different document-level methodologies, and the issue of misevaluation when sentences are evaluated out of context.
Automatic detection of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) from short posts attracted noticeable attention in the last few years. Recent studies showed that this is quite a difficult task, especially on commonly used Twitter data. Obtaining MBTI l
abels is also difficult, as human annotation requires trained psychologists, and automatic way of obtaining them is through long questionnaires of questionable usability for the task. In this paper, we present a method for collecting reliable MBTI labels via only four carefully selected questions that can be applied to any type of textual data.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
