إن السماح للمستخدمين بالتفاعل مع الملخصات المتعددة المستندات هو اتجاه واعد نحو تحسين وتخصيص النتائج الموجزة. تم اقتراح أفكار مختلفة للتلخيص التفاعلي في العمل السابق، لكن هذه الحلول متباينة للغاية ولا تضاهى. في هذه الورقة، نقوم بتطوير إطار تقييم نهاية إلى نهائي للتلخيص التفاعلي، مع التركيز على التفاعل القائم على التوسع، الذي يعتبر تتراكم المعلومات على طول جلسة مستخدم. يتضمن إطار عملنا إجراءات لجمع دورات المستخدم الحقيقية، وكذلك تدابير التقييم التي تعتمد على معايير تلخيص، ولكنها تتكيف مع تعكس التفاعل. جميع حلولنا ومواردنا متوفرة علنا كمعيار، مما يسمح بمقارنة التطورات المستقبلية في تلخيص تفاعلي، وتحفز تقدم في تقييمها المنهجي. نوضح استخدام إطار العمل لدينا من خلال تقييم ومقارنة تطبيقات خط الأساس التي طورنا لهذا الغرض، والتي ستكون بمثابة جزء من معيارنا. تحفيز تجاربنا الواسعة وتحليلنا تصميم إطار التقييم المقترح ودعم صلاحيته.
Allowing users to interact with multi-document summarizers is a promising direction towards improving and customizing summary results. Different ideas for interactive summarization have been proposed in previous work but these solutions are highly divergent and incomparable. In this paper, we develop an end-to-end evaluation framework for interactive summarization, focusing on expansion-based interaction, which considers the accumulating information along a user session. Our framework includes a procedure of collecting real user sessions, as well as evaluation measures relying on summarization standards, but adapted to reflect interaction. All of our solutions and resources are available publicly as a benchmark, allowing comparison of future developments in interactive summarization, and spurring progress in its methodological evaluation. We demonstrate the use of our framework by evaluating and comparing baseline implementations that we developed for this purpose, which will serve as part of our benchmark. Our extensive experimentation and analysis motivate the proposed evaluation framework design and support its viability.
References used
https://aclanthology.org/
Information overload has been one of the challenges regarding information from the Internet. It is not a matter of information access, instead, the focus had shifted towards the quality of the retrieved data. Particularly in the news domain, multiple
Most of existing extractive multi-document summarization (MDS) methods score each sentence individually and extract salient sentences one by one to compose a summary, which have two main drawbacks: (1) neglecting both the intra and cross-document rel
We present a method for generating comparative summaries that highlight similarities and contradictions in input documents. The key challenge in creating such summaries is the lack of large parallel training data required for training typical summari
Presentations are critical for communication in all areas of our lives, yet the creation of slide decks is often tedious and time-consuming. There has been limited research aiming to automate the document-to-slides generation process and all face a c
A crucial difference between single- and multi-document summarization is how salient content manifests itself in the document(s). While such content may appear at the beginning of a single document, essential information is frequently reiterated in a