Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userCLaC-BP at SemEval-2021 Task 8: SciBERT Plus Rules for MeasEval
CLAC-BP في مهمة Semeval-2021 8: قواعد Scibert Plus ل MeasessVal
183
0 0
0.0
(
0
)
Created by
Shamra Editor
Ask ChatGPT about the research
تشرح هذه الورقة تصميم نظام غير متجانس في المرتبة الثامنة في المنافسة في مهمة Semeval2021 8. نقوم بتحليل تجارب الأزمة وإظهار كيفية تأثير مكونات النظام، وهي المراكز الملاقة، معرف الوحدة، مصنف المعدل ونموذج اللغة، على النتيجة الإجمالية.قارنا نتائجنا إلى تجارب مماثلة من الأدب وأدخل خوارزمية تجمع تطورت في مرحلة ما بعد التقييم التي زادت النتيجة الإجمالية لنظام نظامنا، مرفقة بفرضية مرتبة المنافسة من ثمانية إلى ستة.
This paper explains the design of a heterogeneous system that ranked eighth in competition in SemEval2021 Task 8. We analyze ablation experiments and demonstrate how the system components, namely tokenizer, unit identifier, modifier classifier, and language model, affect the overall score. We compare our results to similar experiments from the literature and introduce a grouping algorithm developed in the post-evaluation phase that increased our system's overall score, hypothetically elevating our competition rank from eight to six.
References used
https://aclanthology.org/
rate research
Read More
MeasEval aims at identifying quantities along with the entities that are measured with additional properties within English scientific documents. The variety of styles used makes measurements, a most crucial aspect of scientific writing, challenging
to extract. This paper presents ablation studies making the case for several preprocessing steps such as specialized tokenization rules. For linguistic structure, we encode dependency trees in a Deep Graph Convolution Network (DGCNN) for multi-task classification.
This paper presents the system for SemEval 2021 Task 8 (MeasEval). MeasEval is a novel span extraction, classification, and relation extraction task focused on finding quantities, attributes of these quantities, and additional information, including
the related measured entities, properties, and measurement contexts. Our submitted system, which placed fifth (team rank) on the leaderboard, consisted of SciBERT with [CLS] token embedding and CRF layer on top. We were also placed first in Quantity (tied) and Unit subtasks, second in MeasuredEntity, Modifier and Qualifies subtasks, and third in Qualifier subtask.
We describe MeasEval, a SemEval task of extracting counts, measurements, and related context from scientific documents, which is of significant importance to the creation of Knowledge Graphs that distill information from the scientific literature. Th
is is a new task in 2021, for which over 75 submissions from 25 participants were received. We expect the data developed for this task and the findings reported to be valuable to the scientific knowledge extraction, metrology, and automated knowledge base construction communities.
This work describes our approach for subtasks of SemEval-2021 Task 8: MeasEval: Counts and Measurements which took the official first place in the competition. To solve all subtasks we use multi-task learning in a question-answering-like manner. We a
lso use learnable scalar weights to weight subtasks' contribution to the final loss in multi-task training. We fine-tune LUKE to extract quantity spans and we fine-tune RoBERTa to extract everything related to found quantities, including quantities themselves.
This paper presents our system for the Quantity span identification, Unit of measurement identification and Value modifier classification subtasks of the MeasEval 2021 task. The purpose of the Quantity span identification task was to locate spans of
text that contain a count or measurement, consisting of a value, usually followed by a unit and occasionally additional modifiers. The goal of the modifier classification task was to determine whether an associated text fragment served to indicate range, tolerance, mean value, etc. of a quantity. The developed systems used pre-trained BERT models which were fine-tuned for the task at hand. We present our system, investigate how architectural decisions affected model predictions, and conduct an error analysis. Overall, our system placed 12 / 19 in the shared task and in the 2nd place for the Unit subcategory.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
