Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userULTRA: An Unbiased Learning To Rank Algorithm Toolbox
382
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Anh Tran
Publication date
2021
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
Learning to rank systems has become an important aspect of our daily life. However, the implicit user feedback that is used to train many learning to rank models is usually noisy and suffered from user bias (i.e., position bias). Thus, obtaining an unbiased model using biased feedback has become an important research field for IR. Existing studies on unbiased learning to rank (ULTR) can be generalized into two families-algorithms that attain unbiasedness with logged data, offline learning, and algorithms that achieve unbiasedness by estimating unbiased parameters with real-time user interactions, namely online learning. While there exist many algorithms from both families, there lacks a unified way to compare and benchmark them. As a result, it can be challenging for researchers to choose the right technique for their problems or for people who are new to the field to learn and understand existing algorithms. To solve this problem, we introduced ULTRA, which is a flexible, extensible, and easily configure ULTR toolbox. Its key features include support for multiple ULTR algorithms with configurable hyperparameters, a variety of built-in click models that can be used separately to simulate clicks, different ranking model architecture and evaluation metrics, and simple learning to rank pipeline creation. In this paper, we discuss the general framework of ULTR, briefly describe the algorithms in ULTRA, detailed the structure, and pipeline of the toolbox. We experimented on all the algorithms supported by ultra and showed that the toolbox performance is reasonable. Our toolbox is an important resource for researchers to conduct experiments on ULTR algorithms with different configurations as well as testing their own algorithms with the supported features.
rate research
Read More
Although click data is widely used in search systems in practice, so far the inherent bias, most notably position bias, has prevented it from being used in training of a ranker for search, i.e., learning-to-rank. Recently, a number of authors have proposed new techniques referred to as unbiased learning-to-rank, which can reduce position bias and train a relatively high-performance ranker using click data. Most of the algorithms, based on the inverse propensity weighting (IPW) principle, first estimate the click bias at each position, and then train an unbiased ranker with the estimated biases using a learning-to-rank algorithm. However, there has not been a method for pairwise learning-to-rank that can jointly conduct debiasing of click data and training of a ranker using a pairwise loss function. In this paper, we propose a novel algorithm, which can jointly estimate the biases at click positions and the biases at unclick positions, and learn an unbiased ranker. Experiments on benchmark data show that our algorithm can significantly outperform existing algorithms. In addition, an online A/B Testing at a commercial search engine shows that our algorithm can effectively conduct debiasing of click data and enhance relevance ranking.
How to obtain an unbiased ranking model by learning to rank with biased user feedback is an important research question for IR. Existing work on unbiased learning to rank (ULTR) can be broadly categorized into two groups -- the studies on unbiased learning algorithms with logged data, namely the textit{offline} unbiased learning, and the studies on unbiased parameters estimation with real-time user interactions, namely the textit{online} learning to rank. While their definitions of textit{unbiasness} are different, these two types of ULTR algorithms share the same goal -- to find the best models that rank documents based on their intrinsic relevance or utility. However, most studies on offline and online unbiased learning to rank are carried in parallel without detailed comparisons on their background theories and empirical performance. In this paper, we formalize the task of unbiased learning to rank and show that existing algorithms for offline unbiased learning and online learning to rank are just the two sides of the same coin. We evaluate six state-of-the-art ULTR algorithms and find that most of them can be used in both offline settings and online environments with or without minor modifications. Further, we analyze how different offline and online learning paradigms would affect the theoretical foundation and empirical effectiveness of each algorithm on both synthetic and real search data. Our findings could provide important insights and guideline for choosing and deploying ULTR algorithms in practice.
Interpretability of learning-to-rank models is a crucial yet relatively under-examined research area. Recent progress on interpretable ranking models largely focuses on generating post-hoc explanations for existing black-box ranking models, whereas the alternative option of building an intrinsically interpretable ranking model with transparent and self-explainable structure remains unexplored. Developing fully-understandable ranking models is necessary in some scenarios (e.g., due to legal or policy constraints) where post-hoc methods cannot provide sufficiently accurate explanations. In this paper, we lay the groundwork for intrinsically interpretable learning-to-rank by introducing generalized additive models (GAMs) into ranking tasks. Generalized additive models (GAMs) are intrinsically interpretable machine learning models and have been extensively studied on regression and classification tasks. We study how to extend GAMs into ranking models which can handle both item-level and list-level features and propose a novel formulation of ranking GAMs. To instantiate ranking GAMs, we employ neural networks instead of traditional splines or regression trees. We also show that our neural ranking GAMs can be distilled into a set of simple and compact piece-wise linear functions that are much more efficient to evaluate with little accuracy loss. We conduct experiments on three data sets and show that our proposed neural ranking GAMs can achieve significantly better performance than other traditional GAM baselines while maintaining similar interpretability.
Autocomplete (a.k.a Query Auto-Completion, AC) suggests full queries based on a prefix typed by customer. Autocomplete has been a core feature of commercial search engine. In this paper, we propose a novel context-aware neural network based pairwise ranker (DeepPLTR) to improve AC ranking, DeepPLTR leverages contextual and behavioral features to rank queries by minimizing a pairwise loss, based on a fully-connected neural network structure. Compared to LambdaMART ranker, DeepPLTR shows +3.90% MeanReciprocalRank (MRR) lift in offline evaluation, and yielded +0.06% (p < 0.1) Gross Merchandise Value (GMV) lift in an Amazons online A/B experiment.
Learning to rank is an important problem in machine learning and recommender systems. In a recommender system, a user is typically recommended a list of items. Since the user is unlikely to examine the entire recommended list, partial feedback arises naturally. At the same time, diverse recommendations are important because it is challenging to model all tastes of the user in practice. In this paper, we propose the first algorithm for online learning to rank diverse items from partial-click feedback. We assume that the user examines the list of recommended items until the user is attracted by an item, which is clicked, and does not examine the rest of the items. This model of user behavior is known as the cascade model. We propose an online learning algorithm, cascadelsb, for solving our problem. The algorithm actively explores the tastes of the user with the objective of learning to recommend the optimal diverse list. We analyze the algorithm and prove a gap-free upper bound on its n-step regret. We evaluate cascadelsb on both synthetic and real-world datasets, compare it to various baselines, and show that it learns even when our modeling assumptions do not hold exactly.
suggested questions
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
