Subscribe to the gold package and get unlimited access to Shamra Academy
Register a new userRefined Computational Complexities of Hospitals/Residents Problem with Regional Caps
59
0
0.0
(
0
)
Added by
Koki Hamada
Publication date
2021
fields
Informatics Engineering
and research's language is
English
Authors
Koki Hamada NTT Corporation
Ask ChatGPT about the research
No Arabic abstract
The Hospitals/Residents problem (HR) is a many-to-one matching problem whose solution concept is stability. It is widely used in assignment systems such as assigning medical students (residents) to hospitals. To resolve imbalance in the number of residents assigned to hospitals, an extension called HR with regional caps (HRRC) was introduced. In this problem, a positive integer (called a regional cap) is associated with a subset of hospitals (called a region), and the total number of residents assigned to hospitals in a region must be at most its regional cap. Kamada and Kojima defined strong stability for HRRC and demonstrated that a strongly stable matching does not necessarily exist. Recently, Aziz et al. proved that the problem of determining if a strongly stable matching exists is NP-complete in general. In this paper, we refine Aziz et al.s result by investigating the computational complexity of the problem in terms of the length of preference lists, the size of regions, and whether or not regions can overlap, and completely classify tractable and intractable cases.
rate research
Read More
Consider an online facility assignment problem where a set of facilities $F = { f_1, f_2, f_3, cdots, f_{|F|} }$ of equal capacity $l$ is situated on a metric space and customers arrive one by one in an online manner on that space. We assign a customer $c_i$ to a facility $f_j$ before a new customer $c_{i+1}$ arrives. The cost of this assignment is the distance between $c_i$ and $f_j$. The objective of this problem is to minimize the sum of all assignment costs. Recently Ahmed et al. (TCS, 806, pp. 455-467, 2020) studied the problem where the facilities are situated on a line and computed competitive ratio of Algorithm Greedy which assigns the customer to the nearest available facility. They computed competitive ratio of algorithm named Algorithm Optimal-Fill which assigns the new customer considering optimal assignment of all previous customers. They also studied the problem where the facilities are situated on a connected unweighted graph. In this paper we first consider that $F$ is situated on the vertices of a connected unweighted grid graph $G$ of size $r times c$ and customers arrive one by one having positions on the vertices of $G$. We show that Algorithm Greedy has competitive ratio $r times c + r + c$ and Algorithm Optimal-Fill has competitive ratio $O(r times c)$. We later show that the competitive ratio of Algorithm Optimal-Fill is $2|F|$ for any arbitrary graph. Our bound is tight and better than the previous result. We also consider the facilities are distributed arbitrarily on a plane and provide an algorithm for the scenario. We also provide an algorithm that has competitive ratio $(2n-1)$. Finally, we consider a straight line metric space and show that no algorithm for the online facility assignment problem has competitive ratio less than $9.001$.
Redistricting is the problem of dividing a state into a number $k$ of regions, called districts. Voters in each district elect a representative. The primary criteria are: each district is connected, district populations are equal (or nearly equal), and districts are compact. There are multiple competing definitions of compactness, usually minimizing some quantity. One measure that has been recently promoted by Duchin and others is number of cut edges. In redistricting, one is given atomic regions out of which each district must be built. The populations of the atomic regions are given. Consider the graph with one vertex per atomic region (with weight equal to the regions population) and an edge between atomic regions that share a boundary. A districting plan is a partition of vertices into $k$ parts, each connnected, of nearly equal weight. The districts are considered compact to the extent that the plan minimizes the number of edges crossing between different parts. Consider two problems: find the most compact districting plan, and sample districting plans under a compactness constraint uniformly at random. Both problems are NP-hard so we restrict the input graph to have branchwidth at most $w$. (A planar graphs branchwidth is bounded by its diameter.) If both $k$ and $w$ are bounded by constants, the problems are solvable in polynomial time. Assume vertices have weight~1. One would like algorithms whose running times are of the form $O(f(k,w) n^c)$ for some constant $c$ independent of $k$ and $w$, in which case the problems are said to be fixed-parameter tractable with respect to $k$ and $w$). We show that, under a complexity-theoretic assumption, no such algorithms exist. However, we do give algorithms with running time $O(c^wn^{k+1})$. Thus if the diameter of the graph is moderately small and the number of districts is very small, our algorithm is useable.
Many algorithms for maximizing a monotone submodular function subject to a knapsack constraint rely on the natural greedy heuristic. We present a novel refined analysis of this greedy heuristic which enables us to: $(1)$ reduce the enumeration in the tight $(1-e^{-1})$-approximation of [Sviridenko 04] from subsets of size three to two; $(2)$ present an improved upper bound of $0.42945$ for the classic algorithm which returns the better between a single element and the output of the greedy heuristic.
An enumeration kernel as defined by Creignou et al. [Theory Comput. Syst. 2017] for a parameterized enumeration problem consists of an algorithm that transforms each instance into one whose size is bounded by the parameter plus a solution-lifting algorithm that efficiently enumerates all solutions from the set of the solutions of the kernel. We propose to consider two n
We provide online algorithms for secretary matching in general weighted graphs, under the well-studied models of vertex and edge arrivals. In both models, edges are associated with arbitrary weights that are unknown from the outset, and are revealed online. Under vertex arrival, vertices arrive online in a uniformly random order; upon the arrival of a vertex $v$, the weights of edges from $v$ to all previously arriving vertices are revealed, and the algorithm decides which of these edges, if any, to include in the matching. Under edge arrival, edges arrive online in a uniformly random order; upon the arrival of an edge $e$, its weight is revealed, and the algorithm decides whether to include it in the matching or not. We provide a $5/12$-competitive algorithm for vertex arrival, and show it is tight. For edge arrival, we provide a $1/4$-competitive algorithm. Both results improve upon state of the art bounds for the corresponding settings. Interestingly, for vertex arrival, secretary matching in general graphs outperforms secretary matching in bipartite graphs with 1-sided arrival, where $1/e$ is the best possible guarantee.
Log in to be able to interact and post comments
comments
Fetching comments
Sign in to be able to follow your search criteria
