No Arabic abstract
In response to the comment posted by Nakashima et al. (arXiv:1903.1176), regarding prior claims for the features that we referred to as the Galactic Center Chimneys (2019, Nature, 567, 347), we point out the following: 1) The Nakashima et al. 2019 paper appeared in the arXiv on March 8th (1903.02571), after our paper was in the final stage of printing (accepted on January 30th). It is however interesting to see that the morphology of the brightest portions of the two results are in broad agreement (compare their Fig. 1 to our Extended Data Figs. 1 and 2). 2) Nakashima et al. 2013 ApJ 773, 20 claim the discovery of a blob of recombining plasma ~1deg south of Sgr A*, implying peculiar abundances. Again, their image (Fig. 1) agrees with the brightest portions of our images, although it does not show any direct connection between the plasma blob and the central parsec (e.g., such as the quasi-continuous chimney that we reported), nor evidence for an outflow from the center. We apologize for overlooking an appropriate citation to this contribution by Nakashima et al. 3) We fitted the XMM-Newton and Chandra data at the same position of the claimed recombining plasma and we did not find any clear-cut evidence for the presence of either an over-ionised plasma or peculiar abundances. Future X-ray calorimetric observations will presumably clarify this disagreement. 4) The continuity of the Chimney features, their quasi-symmetrical placement relative to Sgr A*, and their relatively sharp and well-defined edges are the essential features of our data that have led us to propose that the Chimneys are a unified columnar structure that represents a channel for the outflow of energy from the central region, possibly contributing to the stocking of the relativistic particle population manifested in the Fermi Bubbles.
A recent article An X-ray chimney extending hundreds of parsecs above and below the Galactic Centre (2019, Nature, 567, 34) reported the detection of chimney-like X-ray-emitting features above and below the Galactic Center from XMM-Newton observations. We note here that these features were already reported by our Suzaku papers: Nakashima et al. (2013, ApJ, 773, 20, arXiv:1310.4236) for the southern feature and Nakashima et al. (2019, ApJ, in press, arXiv:1903.02571) for the northern feature. In particular, Nakashima et al. (2013) show that the ionization state of the southern feature is not in collisional ionization equilibrium and is most likely in a recombining or over-ionized state, which suggests its origin in the Galactic Center about 0.1 Myr ago.
Evidence has increasingly mounted in recent decades that outflows of matter and energy from the central parsecs of our Galaxy have shaped the observed structure of the Milky Way on a variety of larger scales. On scales of ~15 pc, the Galactic centre has bipolar lobes that can be seen in both X-rays and radio, indicating broadly collimated outflows from the centre, directed perpendicular to the Galactic plane. On far larger scales approaching the size of the Galaxy itself, gamma-ray observations have identified the so-called Fermi Bubble features, implying that our Galactic centre has, or has recently had, a period of active energy release leading to a production of relativistic particles that now populate huge cavities on both sides of the Galactic plane. The X-ray maps from the ROSAT all-sky survey show that the edges of these cavities close to the Galactic plane are bright in X-rays. At intermediate scales (~150 pc), radio astronomers have found the Galactic Centre Lobe, an apparent bubble of emission seen only at positive Galactic latitudes, but again indicative of energy injection from near the Galactic centre. Here we report the discovery of prominent X-ray structures on these intermediate (hundred-parsec) scales above and below the plane, which appear to connect the Galactic centre region to the Fermi bubbles. We propose that these newly-discovered structures, which we term the Galactic Centre Chimneys, constitute a channel through which energy and mass, injected by a quasi-continuous train of episodic events at the Galactic centre, are transported from the central parsecs to the base of the Fermi bubbles.
The issues raised in the comment by T.A. Manz are addressed through the presentation of calculated atomic charges for NaF, NaCl, MgO, SrTiO$_3$ and La$_2$Ce$_2$O$_7$, using our previously presented method for calculating Hirshfeld-I charges in Solids [J. Comput. Chem.. doi: 10.1002/jcc.23088]. It is shown that the use of pseudo-valence charges is sufficient to retrieve the full all-electron Hirshfeld-I charges to good accuracy. Furthermore, we present timing results of different systems, containing up to over $200$ atoms, underlining the relatively low cost for large systems. A number of theoretical issues is formulated, pointing out mainly that care must be taken when deriving new atoms in molecules methods based on expectations for atomic charges.
We discuss the formation of dark compact objects in a dark matter environment in view of the possible mass dependence of pulsars on the distribution of dark matter in the Galaxy. Our results indicate that the pulsar masses should decrease going towards the center of the Milky Way due to dark matter capture, thus becoming a probe for the existence and nature of dark matter. We thus propose that the evolution of the pulsar mass in a dark matter rich environment can be used to put constraints, when combined with future experiments, on the characteristics of our Galaxy halo dark matter profile, on the dark matter particle mass and on the dark matter self-interaction strength.
The hot circum-galactic medium (CGM) represents the hot gas distributed beyond the stellar content of the galaxies while typically within their dark matter halos. It serves as a depository of energy and metal-enriched materials from galactic feedback and a reservoir from which the galaxy acquires fuels to form stars. It thus plays a critical role in the coevolution of galaxies and their environments. X-rays are one of the best ways to trace the hot CGM. I will briefly review what we have learned about the hot CGM based on X-ray observations over the past two decades, and what we still do not know. I will also briefly prospect what may be the foreseeable breakthrough in the next one or two decades with future X-ray missions.